United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1999 NY Rulings > NY E88075 - NY E88128 > NY E88113

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
NY E88113





October 21, 1999

CLA-2-64:RR:NC:TP:347 E88113

CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION

TARIFF NO.: 6404.20.40

Ms. Jane A. Sheridan
Pagoda
8300 Maryland Avenue
St. Louis, MI 63105

RE: The tariff classification of women’s shoes from China.

Dear Ms. Sheridan:

In your letter dated September 29, 1999, you requested a tariff classification ruling.

You have submitted three styles of women’s dress shoes with textile uppers and leather soles. All three shoes feature closed toes and open heels. You state that you cut and weighed the components of each shoe and came up with weight breakdowns for each. Style “Jess-2” is 46% textile/rubber/plastic, 17% leather and 37% other materials; style “Jess-5” is 43% textile/rubber/plastic, 16% leather and 41% other materials; style “Jodi-2” is 45% textile/rubber/plastic, 16% leather and 39% other materials. You also state that the shoes are valued over $2.50 per pair.

The applicable subheading for the shoes will be 6404.20.40, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for footwear in which the upper’s external surface is predominately textile materials, in which the outer sole is predominately leather, in which the shoe, by weight, is not over 50% as a total of textile, rubber and plastic materials, and which is valued over $2.50 per pair. The rate of duty will be 10% ad valorem.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).

A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist Richard Foley at 212-637-7089.

Sincerely,

Robert B. Swierupski
Director,

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: