United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1995 NY Rulings > NY 813299 - NY 813517 > NY 813499

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
NY 813499





September 7, 1995

CLA-2-85:S:N:N1: 112 813499

CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION

TARIFF NO.: 8537.10.9060; 9031.80.0080

Ms. Lisa Peterman
A.W. Fenton Company, Inc.
1157 Rarig Avenue
Columbus, OH 43219-2357

RE: The tariff classification of digital readout and measuring apparatus from the United Kingdom

Dear Ms. Peterman:

In your letter dated August 3, 1995, on behalf of Newall Electronics, Inc., you requested a tariff classification ruling.

As indicated in your request, the DP7 Digipac, DP7 Lathepac, and DP7 Millpac are described as digital readout displays which are used in machining applications. Although each model has different features, they are all basically control devices which monitor and direct the operations being performed. The other devices are identified as the Sapphire, which is a complete milling machine package consisting of a readout display with measuring apparatus, and the Spherosyn/Microsyn, which are different models of measuring transducers.

The applicable subheading for the DP7 Digipac, DP7 Lathepac, and DP7 Millpac will be 8537.10.9060, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for programmable controllers. The rate of duty will be 4.8 percent ad valorem. The applicable subheading for the Sapphire, and the Spherosyn/Microsyn, will be 9031.80.0080, HTS, which provides for other measuring or checking instruments, appliances and machines, not specified or included elsewhere in Chapter 90. The rate of duty will be 4.3 percent ad valorem.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Section 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).

A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction.

Sincerely,

Jean F. Maguire

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: