United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1993 NY Rulings > NY 875687 - NY 876189 > NY 875955

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
NY 875955




July 27, 1992

CLA-2-:71:S:N:N3G:344 875955

CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION

TARIFF NO.: 7117.90.5000

Mr. Paul John Crowley
Sharretts, Paley, Carter & Blauvelt, P.C. Sixty-seven Broad Street
New York, N. Y. 10004

RE: The tariff classification of plastic imitation jewelry sets from China.

Dear Mr. Crowley:

In your letter of July 2, 1992, you requested a tariff classification ruling on plastic imitation jewelry sets.

You have submitted four samples. They are: Style #2611/1, 2611/2, 2611/3 and 2611/4. All of the sets are put up in blister packages for retail sale and labeled "Looks Good" Jewelry. Style #2611/2, 2611/3 and 2611/4 contain a necklace, a bracelet and a pair of earrings, all plastic. Style #2611/1 contains a plastic necklace, plastic earrings and a textile pony tail scrunch. The essential character of Style #2611/1 is derived from the plastic jewelry. The average value of the four jewelry sets is 53 cents each and are designed for use by girls aged 8 years and up.

The applicable subheading for Styles #2611/1, 2611/2, 2611/3 and 2611/4 will be 7117.90.50, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for imitation jewelry, other, other: valued over 20 cents per dozen pieces or parts. The rate of duty will be 11% ad valorem.

Your samples are being returned as requested.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Section 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).

A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction.

Sincerely,

Jean F. Maguire
Area Director

Previous Ruling Next Ruling