United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule

faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers

faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 2008 HQ Rulings > HQ H020654 - HQ H021858 > HQ H021837

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
HQ H021837

---

January 14, 2008

VES-3-02-RR:BSTC:CCI H021837 CK

CATEGORY: CARRIER

Mr. Chris Kitsos
NSA Agencies, Inc.
110 James Drive West, Suite 120
St. Rose, LA 70087

RE: Coastwise Transportation; 46 U.S.C. § 55103; 19 C.F.R. § 4.50(b)

Dear Mr. Kitsos:

This is in response to your letter of January 12, 2008, transmitted by facsimile, in which you inquire about the coastwise transportation of the five individuals mentioned therein aboard the M/V GLORIOUS RENA. Our decision follows.

FACTS

The voyage in question involves the transportation of a five man working crew aboard the non-coastwise-qualified M/V GLORIOUS RENA (the “vessel”) from Port of Point Comfort, TX to Corpus Christi, TX. The five individuals are expected to embark in Port of Point Comfort, TX on or about January 22, 2008 and will be performing cargo hold cleaning operations during the subject voyage so that the vessel may pass inspection so that it may pick up its grain cargo in Corpus Christi, TX. The cargo hold cleaning includes removing residue Bauxite cargo and stains from the cargo holds, bulkheads, side shell plating, and tank tops. The five individuals will disembark in Corpus Christi, TX on or about January 25, 2008.

ISSUE

Whether the five man working crew described in the FACTS section above are “passengers” within the meaning of 46 U.S.C. § 55103 and 19 C.F.R. § 4.50(b).

LAW and ANALYSIS

Generally, the coastwise laws prohibit the transportation of passengers or merchandise between points in the United States embraced within the coastwise laws in any vessel other than a vessel built in, documented under the laws of, and owned by citizens of the United States. Such a vessel, after it has obtained a coastwise endorsement from the U.S. Coast Guard, is said to be “coastwise qualified.”

The coastwise laws generally apply to points in the territorial sea, which is defined as the belt, three nautical miles wide, seaward of the territorial sea baseline, and to points located in internal waters, landward of the territorial sea baseline. The coastwise law applicable to the carriage of passengers is found in 46 U.S.C. § 55103

Recodified by Pub. L. 109-304, enacted on October 6, 2006. which provides:

(a) In General. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter or chapter 121 of this title, a vessel may not transport passengers between ports or places in the United States to which the coastwise laws apply, either directly or via a foreign port, unless the vessel- (1) is wholly owned by citizens of the United States for purposes of engaging in coastwise traffic; (2) has been issued a certificate of documentation with a coastwise endorsement under chapter 121 or is exempt from documentation but would otherwise be eligible for such a certificate and endorsement. (b) Penalty. The penalty for violating subsection (a) is $300 for each passenger transported and landed.

The Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) Regulations, promulgated under the authority of 46 U.S.C. § 55103, provide:

A passenger within the meaning of this part is any person carried on a vessel who is not connected with the operation of the vessel, her navigation, ownership, or business.

19 C.F.R. §4.50(b).

You state that the five man working crew will be transported on the vessel for the purpose of cargo hold cleaning. The vessel will need to pass grain inspections upon arrival in Corpus Christi, TX before it may load its next grain cargo. In this context, and in accordance with previous Headquarters’ rulings, workmen, technicians, or observers transported by vessel between ports of the United States are not classified as “passengers” within the meaning of 46 U.S.C. § 55103 and 19 C.F.R. § 4.50(b), if they are required to be on board to contribute to the accomplishment of the operation of the vessel during the voyage or are on board because of a necessary vessel ownership or business interest during the voyage. HQ 101699(Nov. 5, 1975); see also HQ H017327, dated September 19, 2007 and HQ 116721(Sept. 25, 2006) quoting HQ 101699 and HQ H015504 (August 10, 2007) (working crew aboard vessel to clean holds prior to loading new merchandise in next port not classified as “passengers.”).

In the present case, to the extent the individuals would be engaged in any shipboard activities while traveling on the foreign vessel between coastwise ports, that would be “directly and substantially” related to the operation or business itself, as would be the case under the facts herein submitted, such individuals would not be considered passengers.

Based upon the fact that the five man working crew will be engaged in cleaning the holds of the vessel during the voyage, we find that such individuals are not “passengers” within the meaning of 46 U.S.C. § 55103 and 19 C.F.R. § 4.50(b). Accordingly, the coastwise transportation of such individuals is not in violation of 46 U.S.C. § 55103.

HOLDING

The subject individuals are not “passengers” within the meaning of 46 U.S.C. § 55103 and 19 C.F.R. § 4.50(b). Therefore, the coastwise transportation of such individuals is not in violation of 46 U.S.C. § 55103.

Sincerely,

Glen E. Vereb
Chief

Previous Ruling Next Ruling