United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 2008 HQ Rulings > HQ H020654 - HQ H021858 > HQ H021481

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
HQ H021481




January 8, 2008

VES-3-02:RR:BSTC:CCI H021481 ALS

CATEGORY: CARRIER

Captain Abe Khan
Inchcape Shipping Services
P.O. Box 21217
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33335

RE: Coastwise Transportation; 46 U.S.C. § 55103; 19 CFR 4.50(b)

Dear Capt. Khan:

This letter is in response to your request of January 4, 2008, with respect to the coastwise transportation of a certain individual. Our ruling is set forth below.

FACTS:

You ask whether a certain individual may be transported on the non-coastwise qualified M/T GINGA EAGLE (the "vessel"), from Richmond, California to Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. The individual will embark in Richmond on January 8, 2007, and will disembark in Vancouver on or about January 23, 2008. The individual will be on board to "[supervise the] cargo operations and tank cleaning."

ISSUE:

Whether the subject individual is transported coastwise within the meaning of 46 U.S.C. § 55103.

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

Generally, the coastwise laws prohibit the transportation of passengers or merchandise between points in the United States embraced within the coastwise laws in any vessel other than a vessel built in, documented under the laws of, and owned by citizens of the United States. Such a vessel, after it has obtained a coastwise endorsement from the U.S. Coast Guard, is said to be "coastwise qualified."

The coastwise laws generally apply to points in the territorial sea, which is defined as the belt, three nautical miles wide, seaward of the territorial sea baseline, and to points located in internal waters, landward of the territorial sea baseline.

The coastwise law applicable to the carriage of passengers is found in 46 U.S.C. § 55103 (recodified by Pub. L. 109-304, enacted on October 6, 2006) and provides that:

(a) In General. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter or chapter 121 of this title, a vessel may not transport passengers between ports or places in the United States to which the coastwise laws apply, either directly or via a foreign port, unless the vessel

(1) is wholly owned by citizens of the United States for purposes of engaging in the coastwise traffic; and

(2) has been issued a certificate of documentation with a coastwise endorsement under chapter 121 or is exempt from documentation but would otherwise be eligible for such a certificate and endorsement.

(b) Penalty. The penalty for violating subsection (a) is $300 for each passenger transported and landed.

You state that the subject individual will be disembarking in Canada after having embarked in California. Based on a plain reading of section 55103, it is well settled that there is no coastwise violation when a passenger embarks at a coastwise point and disembarks at a foreign destination. (See 19 CFR §§ 4.80, 4.80a.) By definition, such an itinerary does not constitute coastwise transportation. See, e.g., CBP Ruling HQ H017628 (September 26, 2007). Therefore, given that the subject individual will not be transported coastwise, there is no violation of section 55103 in this case.

HOLDING:

The subject individual is not transported coastwise within the meaning of 46 U.S.C. § 55103. Therefore, the transportation of such individual from Richmond, California to Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada is not in violation of 46 U.S.C. § 55103.

Sincerely,

Glen E. Vereb

Previous Ruling Next Ruling