HQ H017624 - FTZ; nonprivileged foreign status; total zone value; 19 C.F.R. § 146.65 - United States International Trade Commision Rulings

United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule

faqs.org Rulings By Number Rulings By Category Tariff Numbers

faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 2008 HQ Rulings > HQ H015929 - HQ H020609 > HQ H017624

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
HQ H017624

September 28, 2007

OT:RR:CTF:VS H017624 HEF

CATEGORY: VALUATION

Mr. Kenneth G. Weigel
Alston & Bird LLP
The Atlantic Building
950 F Street, NW
Washington, DC 20004

RE: FTZ; nonprivileged foreign status; total zone value; 19 C.F.R. § 146.65

Dear Mr. Weigel:

This is in reply to your letter dated September 14, 2007, requesting clarification of the second issue presented in Headquarters Ruling Letter ("HRL") H010949, dated July 31, 2007. We have reconsidered HRL H010949, and we are issuing this new ruling letter.

Pursuant to section 625(c), Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1625(c)), as amended by section 623 of Title VI (Customs Modernization) of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, Pub. L. 103-182, 107 Stat. 2057, 2186 (1993), notice in the Customs Bulletin of modification of HRL H010949 is not necessary, as it has not been in effect for at least 60 days.

FACTS:

Your client currently purchases and imports parts from various foreign vendors, both related and unrelated, for use in the manufacture of merchandise in the United States. Your client is considering changing this strategy. Under the new strategy contemplated by your client, the vendors will export the merchandise to the United States and admit the merchandise into a U.S. FTZ in non-privileged foreign ("NPF") status. The NPF status merchandise will be stored in the FTZ, and the vendors will retain title to it, until your client purchases it for production needs. Therefore, the NPF status merchandise will not be sold prior to its admission into the FTZ.

You state that under the new strategy, the FTZ operator will receive the NPF status merchandise and track it using an appropriate inventory management system. In addition, no manufacturing, processing, or other alteration of the NPF status merchandise will occur in the FTZ. When your client purchases the NPF status merchandise, it will subsequently withdraw it from the FTZ for entry into the customs territory of the United States.

The price that your client will pay for the NPF status merchandise will fluctuate according to a formula set forth in contracts entered into by your client and the vendors. The actual sale price for any particular part will be calculated monthly using a formula that incorporates publicly reported prices of the metals used in the parts. Thus, the price your client pays for a particular part could fluctuate on a monthly basis. Furthermore, the NPF status merchandise may remain in the FTZ for an unknown period of time before it is purchased. You state that your client will pay for all transportation, brokerage, and FTZ costs separately. Moreover, you attest that payments for such services will not be made to the vendors or to any parties related to the vendors.

When your client withdraws the NPF status merchandise from the FTZ, a "pull" invoice will be created based on the sales transaction that occurs while the NPF status merchandise is stored in the FTZ. The invoice will reflect the price your client pays for the NPF status merchandise at the time of its withdrawal from the FTZ, as calculated by the pricing formula agreed to by the parties. Your client will file a weekly entry covering such withdrawals, and the FTZ operator will file weekly entry estimates and produce weekly pro forma invoices for the NPF status merchandise withdrawn from the FTZ.

Since the price actually paid for the NPF status merchandise is unknown at the time of its admission to FTZ, the vendors will prepare pro forma invoices to accompany the shipments of the merchandise for admission to the U.S. FTZ. Your client proposes that these pro forma invoices state a value for the merchandise based on the most recent price paid by your client for the identical or similar article. You state that this price will not include any international shipment charges, other movement charges, FTZ costs, and other non-dutiable charges. Furthermore, you state that upon admission of the NPF status merchandise into the FTZ, the value reflected on the invoice and on Customs Form 214 will be the transaction value of the most recent sale between the vendor and your client involving identical or similar merchandise. You note that in instances where your client has not previously purchased a particular part being admitted into the FTZ, the value on the pro forma invoice will reflect the amount your client would pay for the part, adjusted as appropriate to calculate the dutiable value, at the time of exportation.

ISSUES:

1. What is the proper basis of appraisement for the NPF status merchandise when entered into the customs territory of the United States from a FTZ?

2. How should the value of the NPF status merchandise be determined at the time of its admission to the FTZ?

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

1. Entry of the NPF Status Merchandise into the Customs Territory of the United States

It is a basic principle of customs law that articles are classified and appraised on the basis of their condition at the time of importation into the United States, and not upon the basis of what their condition may become after they enter the United States. See, e.g., United States v. Citroen, 223 U.S. 407 (1911); Simod America Corp. v. United States, 872 F. 2d 1572 (Fed. Cir. 1989). An exception to this principle is the Foreign Trade Zone Act of 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 81a et seq.). Under section 3(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. § 81c(a)), foreign merchandise may be admitted into a FTZ and its classification and dutiability may be delayed until it, or merchandise resulting from its manufacture or manipulation, is entered into the customs territory of the United States.

Pursuant to section 146.65(b)(2), Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. § 146.65(b)(2)), the dutiable value of NPF status merchandise entered into the customs territory of the United States from a FTZ is the price actually paid or payable for the merchandise in the transaction that caused the merchandise to be admitted into the zone, plus the statutory additions enumerated in section 402(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. § 1401a(b)(1)), less, if included, international shipment and insurance costs and U.S. inland freight costs. In the instant case, the NPF status merchandise is not admitted into the FTZ as a result of a sales transaction. Consequently, there is no price actually paid or payable upon which to base the dutiable value of the NPF status merchandise at issue.

In such instances, the Customs Regulations provide that if there is no such price actually paid or payable, or no reasonable representation of that cost or of the statutory additions, the dutiable value is based on the total zone value, i.e., the price actually paid or payable to the zone seller in the transaction that caused the merchandise to be transferred from the zone less specified costs incurred in the zone which are included in that value. See 19 C.F.R. § 146.65(b)(1) and (2). The following specified costs, if included in the total zone value, are to be excluded: the zone costs of processing or fabrication, general expenses and profit and the international shipment and insurance costs, and U.S. inland freight costs related to the merchandise transferred from the zone. See 19 C.F.R. § 146.65(b)(2).

Under the new strategy, your client will purchase NPF status merchandise stored in the FTZ from foreign vendors, both related and unrelated, and it will subsequently enter the NPF status merchandise into the customs territory of the United States. These sales are the transactions that cause the NPF status merchandise to be transferred from the zone for purposes of 19 C.F.R. § 146.65(b)(1).

"Total zone value" should be determined in accordance with the valuation principles of 19 U.S.C. § 1401a. See 19 C.F.R. § 146.65(b)(1). The preferred method of appraisement under 19 U.S.C. § 1401a is transaction value, which is defined as "the price actually paid or payable for the merchandise when sold for exportation to the United States," plus certain enumerated additions to the extent they are not otherwise included in the price actually paid or payable. See 19 U.S.C. § 1401a(b)(1).

Transaction value is an acceptable basis of appraisement only if, inter alia, the buyer and seller are not related, or if related, the circumstances of sale indicate that the relationship does not influence the price actually paid or payable, or the transaction value of the merchandise closely approximates certain "test values," i.e., previously accepted values of identical or similar merchandise. See 19 U.S.C. § 1401a(b)(2)(B). You state that your client will purchase the NPF status merchandise from both unrelated and related foreign vendors and that the prices paid for the merchandise will fluctuate according to a formula in the contracts between your client and the vendors. This ruling does not address the acceptability of the prices between your client and its related vendors. We will assume, for the purposes of this ruling, that the prices your client pays to its related vendors are not influenced by the relationships between the parties.

Based on these particular facts, we conclude that the proper basis of appraisement for the NPF status merchandise when entered into the customs territory of the United States from the FTZ is the total zone value, which is the price your client pays to the vendors in the transactions that cause the merchandise to be transferred from the zone, less any costs specified in 19 C.F.R. § 146.65(b)(2) that are incurred in the zone and included in that value. You state that no further processing, manufacturing, or other alteration of the NPF status merchandise will occur while it is stored in the FTZ. In addition, your client will pay for all transportation costs associated with the merchandise separately. Based on these facts, there are no adjustments to be made to the zone value.

2. Admission of the NPF Status Merchandise into the FTZ

The second issue concerns the value of the NPF status merchandise at the time of its application for admission into the FTZ. Application for admission of merchandise into a FTZ is made on Customs Form 214 ("Application for Foreign Trade Zone Admission and/or Status Designation"). See 19 C.F.R. § 146.32(a). In addition to Customs Form 214, an applicant must submit a statistical copy on Customs Form 214-A for transmittal to the Bureau of Census, unless the applicant has made arrangements for direct transmittal of the statistical information with the Bureau of Census. See id. Item 20, on both Customs Form 214 and Customs Form 214-A, requires the applicant seeking to admit merchandise into the FTZ to submit a "Separate Value" for such merchandise.

In this case, the NPF status merchandise will not be subject to duties upon admission into the FTZ. Instead, as discussed in the preceding section of this ruling letter, the dutiable value of the NPF status merchandise will be determined on the date upon which the merchandise is entered for consumption into the United States. As the price actually paid for the subject merchandise will not be known until your client purchases the NPF status merchandise stored in the FTZ, your client proposes that the separate value for the NPF status merchandise declared by the vendor on Customs Form 214 reflect the value of the most recent sale between a vendor and your client for identical or similar merchandise. These same values will be reflected on pro forma invoices that the vendors will prepare to accompany the NPF status merchandise admitted to the zone. In instances where your client has not previously purchased an identical or similar part to the one being admitted to the FTZ, the value on the pro forma invoice will reflect the amount your client would pay for the part, adjusted as appropriate to calculate the dutiable value, at the time of exportation.

Customs and Border Protection ("CBP") supports the Bureau of Census in the collection of foreign trade statistics. As the information collected on Customs Form 214 and Customs Form 214A is not entirely within the purview of CBP, we decline to issue a ruling on this particular issue. However, based on the facts provided, CBP does not object to your proposal to use the value of the most recent sale between the vendor and your client for identical or similar merchandise as the basis of the separate value declared on Customs Form 214. We recommend that you consult the Bureau of Census on this matter.

HOLDING:

Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 146.65(b)(2), the dutiable value of the NPF status merchandise is the zone value, i.e., the price that your client pays to the vendors for the merchandise in the transaction that causes the NPF status merchandise to be transferred from the FTZ, less any included zone costs of processing or fabrication, general expenses and profit and any costs related to international shipment and insurance costs and U.S. inland freight costs. In the instant case, there are no adjustments to be made to the zone value. HRL H010949 is hereby modified.

A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time the subject goods are entered. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling letter should be brought to the attention of the CBP official handling the transaction.

Sincerely,

Monika R. Brenner, Chief

Previous Ruling Next Ruling