United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 2007 HQ Rulings > HQ W116691 - HQ W562827 > HQ W116691

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
HQ W116691





October 16, 2006

VES-13-18-RR:BSTC:CCI 116691 IDL

CATEGORY: CARRIER

Supervisory Customs Entry Officer
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
1515 Poydras Street, 17th Floor
New Orleans, Louisiana 70112

RE: 19 U.S.C. § 1466; Vessel Repair Entry C20-0060815-1; Protest No. 2002- 03-100043; MV R. J. PFEIFFER, V. 202

Dear Madam:

This is in response to your memorandum of June 22, 2006, forwarding for our review the protest filed by counsel on behalf of Matson Navigation Company with respect to Vessel Repair Entry C20-0060815-1. Our ruling on this matter is set forth below.

FACTS:

The MV R. J. PFEIFFER, a U.S.-flagged vessel owned by the protestant, incurred foreign shipyard costs. On November 12, 2001, the vessel arrived at Los Angeles, California. A vessel repair entry was timely filed. On October 25, 2002, a determination of duty occurred in the amount of $9,714.94. On January 21, 2003, the protestant filed Protest No. 2002-03-100043.

ISSUE:

Whether the costs for which the protestant seeks relief are dutiable under 19 U.S.C. § 1466?

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

Initially, we note that the information in the file indicates that the protest, with application for further review, was timely filed under the statutory and regulatory provisions for protests. 19 U.S.C. 1514(c)(3) and 19 CFR 174.12(e).

Title 19, United States Code, section 1466(a) (19 U.S.C. 1466(a)) provides, in pertinent part, for the payment of an ad valorem duty of 50 percent of the cost of “equipments, or any part thereof, including boats, purchased for, or the repair parts or materials to be used, or the expenses or repairs made in a foreign country upon a vessel documented under the laws of the United States.”

Counsel for the protestant filed a supplemental submission, dated June 13, 2006, with the VRU, pursuant to section 1554 of the “Miscellaneous Trade and Technical Corrections Act of 2004.” Section 1554 of the Miscellaneous Trade and Technical Corrections Act of 2004, signed by the President on December 3, 2004, amended the vessel repair statute by adding the following exemption to section 1466(a) found in 19 U.S.C. § 1466(h):

(4) the cost of equipment, repair parts, and materials that are installed on a vessel documented under the laws of the United States and engaged in the foreign or coasting trade, if the installation is done by members of the regular crew of such vessel while the vessel is on the high seas.

Declaration and entry shall not be required with respect to the installation, equipment, parts, and materials.

This legislation further provides for a retroactive effective date for that equipment, repair parts, and materials installed on or after April 25, 2001.

Subsequently, Section 1631 of the “Pension Protection Act of 2006”, signed by the President on August 17, 2006, further amended section 1466(h)(4) by exempting from duty such costs if the installation is done by members of the regular crew while the vessel is “in foreign waters, or in a foreign port, and does not involve foreign shipyard repairs by foreign labor.”

As noted above, the subject protest was received by the VRU on January 21, 2003, and counsel for the protestant filed a supplemental submission dated June 13, 2006.

The items under examination, TR Nos. 547, 550, 590, 596, 615, 617, 619, 620-622, 634, 635, and 640 involve installation of spare repair parts to the vessel by members of the regular crew of the vessel while the vessel was in a foreign port, and such items are exempt from duties under section 1466(h)(4). Accordingly, we find that these items are non-dutiable.

HOLDING:

The costs for which the protestant seeks relief are non-dutiable under 19 U.S.C. § 1466. The protest should be GRANTED.

In accordance with the Protest/Petition Processing Handbook (CIS HB, January 2002, pp. 18 and 21), you are to mail this decision, together with the Customs Form 19, to the protestant no later than 60 days from the date of this letter. Any reliquidation of the entry in accordance with the decision must be accomplished prior to mailing of the decision. Sixty days from the date of the decision the Office of Regulations and Rulings will make the decision available to CBP personnel, and to the public on the CBP Home Page on the World Wide Web at www.cbp.gov, by means of the Freedom of Information Act, and other methods of public distribution.

Sincerely,

Glen E. Vereb
Chief

Previous Ruling Next Ruling