United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 2007 HQ Rulings > HQ H015913 - HQ H016970 > HQ H016892

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
HQ H016892




September 12, 2007

VES-3-02-OT:RR:BSTC:CCI H016892 LLB

CATEGORY: CARRIER

Soli Vevaina
Mathiesen Maritime Services
14621 Comet Street
Irvine, California 92604

RE: Coastwise Transportation; 46 U.S.C. § 55103

Dear Sir or Madam:

This letter is in response to your September 10, 2007, correspondence, in which you inquire about the coastwise transportation of the two individuals mentioned therein aboard the M/V RICKMERS DALIAN. Our decision follows.

FACTS

The voyage in question involves the transportation of the subject individuals aboard the non-coastwise-qualified M/V RICKMERS DALIAN (the “vessel”). The individuals will embark in San Diego, California on September 17, 2007 and will be disembarking in Hamburg, Germany.

ISSUE

Whether the use of a non-coastwise qualified vessel in the voyage described above constitutes an engagement in the coastwise trade in violation of 46 U.S.C. § 55103.

Law and Analysis

Generally, the coastwise laws prohibit the transportation of passengers or merchandise between points in the United States embraced within the coastwise laws in any vessel other than a vessel built in, documented under the laws of, and owned by citizens of the United States. Such a vessel, after it has obtained a coastwise endorsement from the U.S. Coast Guard, is said to be “coastwise qualified.”

The coastwise laws generally apply to points in the territorial sea, which is defined as the belt, three nautical miles wide, seaward of the territorial sea baseline, and to points located in internal waters, landward of the territorial sea baseline. The coastwise law applicable to the carriage of passengers is found in 46 U.S.C. § 55103

Recodified by Pub. L. 109-304, enacted on October 6, 2006. which provides:

(a) In General. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter or chapter 121 of this title, a vessel may not transport passengers between ports or places in the United States to which the coastwise laws apply, either directly or via a foreign port, unless the vessel- (1) is wholly owned by citizens of the United States for purposes of engaging in coastwise traffic; (2) has been issued a certificate of documentation with a coastwise endorsement under chapter 121 or is exempt from documentation but would otherwise be eligible for such a certificate and endorsement. (b)Penalty. The penalty for violating subsection (a) is $300 for each passenger transported and landed.

Based on the facts you provided, the coastwise laws are inapplicable to the subject individuals’ voyage. Although the subject individuals will embark the vessel at San Diego, California, a U.S. port, the individuals are disembarking at a foreign port, i.e., Hamburg, Germany. Therefore, these individuals will not be in violation of the coastwise laws insofar as their transportation does not involve disembarkation at a coastwise port. We do not reach the issue of whether the individuals are passengers within the meaning of 46 U.S.C. § 55103 and 19 C.F.R. § 4.50(b) insofar as the ruling request did not provide any information regarding what the individuals would be doing aboard the vessel.

HOLDING

The use of a non-coastwise qualified vessel in the voyage described above does not constitute an engagement in the coastwise trade in violation of 46 U.S.C. § 55103.

Sincerely,

Glen E. Vereb
Chief

Previous Ruling Next Ruling