United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 2004 HQ Rulings > HQ 966658 - HQ 966771 > HQ 966771

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
HQ 966771





September 15, 2004

CLA-2 RR:CR:GC 966771ptl

CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION

TARIFF No.: 2106.90.9998

Ms. Gretchen M. Brunner
Logistics Manager, North America
Novogen, Inc.
One Landmark Square
2nd Floor
Stamford, CT 06901

RE: Reconsideration of NY C80284, "Promensil," Red Clover.

Dear Ms. Brunner:

This is in response to your letter to the Director, National Commodity Specialist Division, dated September 17, 2003, in which you requested reconsideration of New York Ruling (NY) C80284, dated October 27, 1997, which classified "Promensil" tablets in subheading 2106.90.9998 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which provides for food preparations not elsewhere specified or included other other other.

FACTS:

The product in question is identified as "Promensil." It is marketed in the form of 500 milligram tablets. According to manufacturer's product literature provided with your request for reconsideration:

"Each tablet of Promensil contains a standardised 40 mg of the four principle isoflavones in their aglycone (sugarless) and highly bioavailable form – biochanin A, formononetin, genistein and daidzein.

The final product is a blend of extracts from three different red clover varieties selected for their high isoflavone content and proportions of different isoflavones. The ratio of isoflavones is optimized for women's health during menopause (Figure 11).

In addition to the red clover extract Promensil tablets contain the following excipients: ● Calcium hydrogen phosphate
● Microcrystalline cellulose
● Silica-colloidal anhydrous
● Magnesium stearate
● Natural vitamin E (Mixed tocopherols) ● Titanium dioxind

Promensil is free of sugar, yeast, milk derivitives, wheat, cornstarch, gluten, preservatives, artificial colours and flavours." (Paragraph 3.1, Clinical Monograph, "The Role of Red Clover Isoflavones in Women's Health," Novogen)

The literature provides information regarding dosage recommendations for peri-menopausal (women approaching menopause and those who have early symptoms) and menopausal women, and instructs that Promensil should be taken with a meal and at approximately the same time each day. Elsewhere in the literature, the manufacturer states: "Promensil™ and Rimostil™ (Novogen Ltd) are dietary supplements which contain extracts of red clover (Trifolium pratense), a rich source of all four major active isoflavones biochanin A, formononetin, genistein and daidzein." (Paragraph 2.6.2, Novogen Monograph)

The Novogen website provides additional information about the product. After describing Promensil as being a dietary supplement and listing symptoms for which the product is taken and other benefits attributed to the product, the website contains language which complies with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) mandate that all nutrition supplements disclose that "These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease." (www.promensil.com)

This request for reconsideration of the classification of Promensil contained in NY C80284, is based upon peer review publications of clinical trials which "clearly demonstrate its remedial properties." These materials were presented to Canadian Customs and the product was "re-assigned a HTS of 3004.90.00(79). Which is the equivalent to the USA HTS of 3004.90.9190." When the materials were presented to Netherlands Customs, that authority "reclassified Promensil as a medicament under heading 1211.90.98, which is the equivalent to the USA HTS 2111.90.9031."

Copies of documents from both administrations were provided with your submission (The Netherlands document untranslated from the original Dutch). Additionally, you provided literature on clinical studies on the efficacy of isoflavones on a variety of women's health concerns.

ISSUE:

What is the classification of "Promensil" dietary supplement tablets?

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

Merchandise is classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) in accordance with the General Rules of Interpretation (GRIs). The systematic detail of the HTSUS is such that most goods are classified by application of GRI 1, that is, according to the terms of the headings of the tariff schedule and any relative Section or Chapter Notes. In the event that the goods cannot be classified solely on the basis of GRI 1, and if the headings and legal notes do not otherwise require, the remaining GRIs may then be applied in order.

In understanding the language of the HTSUS, the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System Explanatory Notes may be utilized. The Explanatory Notes (ENs), although not dispositive or legally binding, provide a commentary on the scope of each heading of the HTSUS, and are the official interpretation of the Harmonized System at the international level. See T.D. 89-80, 54 Fed. Reg. 35127, 35128 (August 23, 1989).

The HTSUS subheadings under consideration are as follows:

1211 Plants and parts of plants (including seeds and fruits), of a kind used primarily in perfumery, in pharmacy or for insecticidal, fungicidal or similar purposes, fresh or dried, whether or not cut, crushed or powdered:

1211.90 Other:

1211.90.90 Other
Substances having anesthetic, prophylactic or therapeutic properties and principally used as medicaments or as ingredients in medicaments:

1211.90.9031 Other

2106 Food preparations not elsewhere specified or included:

2106.90 Other:

Other:
Other:
Other:
Other:
2106.90.99 Other

2106.90.9998 Other

3004 Medicaments (excluding goods of heading 3002, 3005 or 3006) consisting of mixed or unmixed products for therapeutic or prophylactic uses, put up in measured doses (including those in the form of transdermal administration systems) or in forms or packings for retail sale:

3004.90 Other:

3004.90.91 Other

3004.90.9190 Other

CPB has previously considered products which contain extracts and other ingredients which in addition to being marketed as nutrition supplements, are also said to provide some particular health benefit. We will address the classification considerations in the various competing headings.

The ENs to heading 1211 provide, in relevant part, as follows:

"This heading covers vegetable products of a kind used primarily in perfumery, in pharmacy or medicine, or for insecticidal, fungicidal, parasiticidal or similar purposes. They may be in the form of whole plants, mosses or lichens, or of parts (such as wood, bark, roots, stems, leaves, flowers, petals, fruits and seeds (other than oleaginous fruits and oil seeds classified in headings 12.01 to 12.07)), or in the form of waste resulting, in the main, from mechanical treatment. They remain in the heading whether fresh or dried, whole, cut, crushed, ground or powdered or (where appropriate) grated or hulled. Products of this heading impregnated with alcohol remain classified here."

The EN continues to provide, as follows:

"However, the heading excludes such products consisting of plants or parts of plants (including seeds or fruits) of different species (whether or not incorporating plants or plant parts of other headings) or consisting of plants or parts of plants of a single or of different species mixed with other substances, such as one or more plant extracts (heading 21.06)."

The Promensil tablets are not in the form of whole plants, or parts of plants. The Promensil tablets contain some parts of plants, but those parts have been mixed with other substances to make them suitable for use as nutrition supplements. Accordingly, they are excluded from classification in heading 1211, HTSUS.

Since we have determined that the Promensil tablets are not products of Chapter 12, we must determine whether they are food preparations of heading 2106 or medicaments of heading 3004.

When articles are imported into the US, their classification is governed not only by the GRIs, as stated above, but also by the Additional U.S. Rules of Interpretation. Additional U.S. Rule 1(a) provides:

1. In the absence of special language or context which otherwise requires

(a) a tariff classification controlled by use (other than actual use) is to be determined in accordance with the use in the United States at, or immediately prior to, the date of importation, of goods of that class or kind to which the imported goods belong, and the controlling use is the principal use; ... .

Heading 3004, HTSUS, which you suggest is the proper heading for your product is a use heading. This is clear from the language of both the legal text of the tariff (“... products for therapeutic or prophylactic uses...”) and the language contained in the ENs.

On page 571, EN 30.04 states:

This heading covers medicaments consisting of mixed or unmixed products, provided they are: (a) Put up in measured doses or in forms such as tablets, ampoules (for example, redistilled water, in ampoules of 1.25 to 10 cm³, for use (Emphasis added) either for the direct treatment of certain diseases, e.g., alcoholism, diabetic coma or as a solvent for the preparation of injectible medicinal solutions), capsules, cachets, drops or pastilles, medicaments in the form of transdermal administration systems, or small quantities of powder, ready for taking as single doses for therapeutic or prophylactic use (Emphasis added)."

However, EN 30.04 (b) states, in part, “ the mere indication of pharmaceutical or other degree of purity in not alone sufficient to justify classification in this heading.”

On page 572, EN 30.04 further states:

Moreover, products consisting of a mixture of plants or parts of plants or consisting of plants or parts of plants mixed with other substances, used for making herbal infusions or herbal “teas” (e.g., those having laxative, purgative, diuretic or carminative properties), and claimed to offer relief from ailments or contribute to general health and well-being, are also excluded from this heading (heading 21.06).

Referring to The Random House Dictionary of the English Language, unabridged Edition, 1973, on page 890, we find “medicament” defined as “a healing substance; medicine; remedy.” “Therapeutic” is defined, on page 1472, as “of or pertaining to the treating or curing of disease; curative.” “Prophylactic” is defined, on page 1153, as “defending or protecting from disease, as a drug.” “Disease” is defined, on page 411, as “a condition of an organ, part, structure or system of the body in which there is incorrect function resulting from the effect of heredity, infection, diet, or environment; illness; sickness; ailment.”

If the products are to be classified in heading 3004, they must, as indicated by the EN, be used for therapeutic or prophylactic purposes. In determining how a product is used, CBP can look to the packaging and labeling of the product. In this instance, the Promensil literature states, among other claims, that the product is proven to “promote emotional well-being” and manage the symptoms of menopause naturally. The literature further states that “A healthy diet and exercise are also an important part of managing menopause.” These statements, especially when read together with another statement which also appears on the package, “This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease” indicate that the product is being marketed principally as something to promote general health and well-being and not as a product to be used solely for its therapeutic or prophylactic properties. Paragraph (16) to EN 21.06, page 183, directs that when goods based on extracts from plants are put up in packagings with indications that they maintain general health or well-being, they should not be classified in heading 3004.

Because the product contains parts of plants mixed with other substances and is used to promote general health and well-being, in accordance with the language of EN 30.04, it is not a medicament of heading 3004, HTSUS, but rather a food supplement of heading 2106, HTSUS. In earlier rulings, Customs has classified herbal supplements which were marketed as nutritional supplements in Chapter 21, HTSUS. In HQ 962323, issued February 3, 2000, HQ 953679, issued February 1, 1994, HQ 085492, issued October 20, 1989, and HQ 960607, issued July 31, 1998, Customs classified a variety of herbal supplement products containing herb and plant extracts (and also containing added excipients and/or other substances, as do the instant articles) which had been put up for retail sale in heading 2106, HTSUS.

The language of Additional U.S. Rule 1(a) provides that goods are to be classified as they are to be used in the U.S. In the U.S., the introduction into commerce, labeling and use of foods, drugs and medicaments is governed by the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C.A. 301 et seq.). Although it is well established that while statutes, regulations and administrative interpretations not related to tariff purposes are not determinative of CBP classification disputes, because of Additional U.S. Rule 1(a), CBP may refer to them to assist in determining the use of goods in the U.S.

Section 321 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.A. 321) contains definitions of terms used in that Act. Section 321(g) defines the term “drug” for purposes of the FD&C Act and states: (g)(1) The term “drug” means (A) articles recognized in the official United States Pharmacopoeia, official Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States, or official National Formulary, or any supplement to any of them; and (B) articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals; and (C) articles (other than food) intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals; and (D) articles intended for use as a component of any article specified in clauses (A), (B), or (C) of this paragraph. A food or dietary supplement for which a claim, subject to sections 343(r)(1)(B) and 343 (r)(3) of this title or sections 343(r)(1)(B) and 343(r)(5)(D) of this title, is made in accordance with the requirements of section 343(r) of this title is not a drug solely because the label or labeling contain such a claim. A food, dietary ingredient, or dietary supplement for which a truthful and not misleading statement is made in accordance with section 343(r)(6) of this title is not a drug under clause (C) solely because the label or the labeling contains such a statement.

Section 321(ff) defines the term “dietary supplement.” The term “dietary supplement” means, among other things, a product (other than tobacco) intended to supplement the diet that contains one or more of certain dietary ingredients, such as a vitamin, a mineral, an herb or other botanical, an amino acid, a dietary substance for use by man to supplement the diet by increasing the total dietary intake, or a concentrate, metabolite, constituent, extract, or combination of the preceding ingredients. Section 321(ff) further limits the term dietary supplement to mean products that are intended for ingestion in a form described in 21 U.S.C. 350(c)(1)(B)(I) (i.e., tablet, capsule, powder, softgel, gelcap, and liquid), that are not represented as conventional food, or as the sole item of a meal or of the diet, and that are labeled as dietary supplements.

Section 321 further states that: “Except for purposes of paragraph (g) [of 21 U.S.C. 321], a dietary supplement shall be deemed to be a food within the meaning of th[e] [act].” 21 U.S.C. 321(ff). Therefore, the language of the FD&C Act clearly states that dietary supplements are foods.

Promensil tablets are clearly dietary supplements within the meaning of the FD&C Act. First, the product contains ingredients defined in 21 U.S.C. 321(ff) and is labeled as a dietary supplement in accordance with 21 U.S.C. 321(ff)(2)(C) and 21 CFR 101.3(g). Second, the label bears nutrition labeling in accordance with the mandatory dietary supplement requirements in 21 CFR 101.36. Third, the label bears claims made pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 343(r)(6), including the mandatory disclaimer required for claims made under the authority of that section. Only dietary supplements are eligible to bear claims on their label under the authority of 21 U.S.C. 343(r)(6). Fourth, the label bears no claims that evidence that the product is intended for use as a drug within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. 321(g). Because these tablets are dietary supplements under the FD&C Act, they are also foods under the FD&C Act. Congress, in enacting the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (21 U.S.C. 301 note) (DSHEA), established that articles such as the Promensil tablets are to be regulated by the FDA as foods and not as drug products.

While classifying products based solely upon labeling in compliance with FDA regulations would be an abuse of discretion, CBP cannot arbitrarily ignore the actions and intent of Congress embodied in the DSHEA. When the DSHEA and EN 30.04 are read together, it is clear that both are referring to the same product. By independently applying the DSHEA and the HTSUS, the FDA and CBP can reach the same conclusion regarding the character and use of the product.

Based on the above discussion, we cannot agree with the classifications of Promensil provided by either the decision of the Canadian Administration or that of the Netherlands which you have provided.

Accordingly, Promensil tablets which are dietary supplements are properly classified in heading 2106, HTSUS, as food preparations not elsewhere specified or included.

HOLDING:

"Promensil" 500 milligram tablets are dietary supplements and are classified in subheading 2106.90.9998, HTSUS, which provides for food preparations not elsewhere specified or included: other: other: other: other: other: other other. The 2004 rate of duty is 6.4% ad valorem.

Duty rates are provided for your convenience and are subject to change. The text of the most recent HTSUS and the accompanying duty rates are provided on the World Wide Web at www.usitc.gov.

NY C80284, dated October 27, 1997, is affirmed.

Sincerely,

Myles B. Harmon, Director

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: