United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 2002 HQ Rulings > HQ 965512 - HQ 965587 > HQ 965568

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
HQ 965568




September 25, 2002

CLA2 RR:CR:TE 965568 SG

CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION

TARIFF NO.: 4202.92.9060

David M. Murphy, Esq.
Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz. Silverman & Klestadt, LLP 245 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10167-3397

RE: Classification of jewelry gift boxes; Heading 4202; paper coated with a sheeting of plastic; Skivertex®; Pellaq™; subheading 4202.92; “outer surface of”; “sheeting of plastics”; Sarne Handbags Corp. v. United States

Dear Mr. Murphy:

This is in reply to your correspondence of December 11, 2001, and follow-up correspondence dated March 6, 2002, in which you request, on behalf of your client, Chippenhook Corporation, a binding classification ruling under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA), for three jewelry boxes, style nos. 8914, 8910-877, and 7256. Samples of the boxes, the boxes' outer surface material (Skivertex® paper for style nos. 8914 and 8910-877, and Pellaq™ paper for style no. 7256), as well as sales literature and product data sheets were provided.

FACTS:

The submitted samples are described as follows:

Style No. 8914 is a rectangular-shaped jewelry box constructed of plastic and covered with Skivertex® paper. It measures approximately 2-9/16 inches in length, 3 inches in width, and 2 inches in height. It features an opening lid with an interior metal hinge. In addition, the box has an interior upper lid lined with a white satin man-made fiber textile fabric. The interior bottom lid is fitted with a padded man-made textile fabric which contains a slit for the express purpose of accommodating a ring. The box is intended to be imported empty and utilized in store showcases to display a ring, as well as provide long-term protection for the ring. The ring box is intended to be sold along with the ring it displays at the point in time that the ring is purchased.

Style No. 7256 is a square-shaped jewelry box constructed of molded plastic and covered with Pellaq™ paper. It measures approximately 3 3/4 inches in length, 3 3/4 inches in width, and 2 3/16 inches in height. It features an opening lid with an interior metal hinge. The interior upper lid is lined with a white satin man-made fiber textile fabric. The interior bottom lid is lined with a man-made fiber textile fabric. The interior bottom lid contains a man-made fiber textile flap which is adorned with two slits the express purpose of which is to hold a pair of earrings. The box is intended to be imported empty and utilized in store showcases to display a pair of earrings, as well as provide long-term protection for the earrings. The earring box is intended to be sold along with the earrings it displays at the point in time that the earrings are purchased.

Style No. 8910-877 is a rectangular-shaped jewelry box constructed of plastic and covered with Skivertex® paper. It measures approximately 2-3/16 inches in length, 2 inches in width, and 1-3/4 inches in height. It features an opening lid with an interior metal hinge. In addition, the box has an interior upper lid lined with a white satin man-made fiber textile fabric. The interior bottom lid is fitted with a padded man-made fiber textile fabric which contains a slit for the express purpose of accommodating a ring. The box is intended to be imported empty and utilized in store showcases to display a ring, as well as provide long-term protection for the ring. The ring box is intended to be sold along with the ring it displays at the point in time that the ring is purchased.

FIBERMARK DSI of South Hadley, Massachusetts, the manufacturer of the coated paper materials, provided information on the composition. The boxes are suitable for long term use.

ISSUE:

What is the correct classification of the subject jewelry gift boxes?

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

Classification of goods under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA) is governed by the General Rules of Interpretation (GRIs), taken in order. GRI 1 provides that classification shall be determined according to the terms of the headings and any relative section or chapter notes. In the event that the goods cannot be classified solely on the basis of GRI 1, and if the headings and legal notes do not otherwise require, the remaining GRI may then be applied.

The Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System Explanatory Notes (EN) represent the official interpretation of the Harmonized System at the international level (for the 4 digit headings and the 6 digit subheadings) and facilitate classification under the HTSUSA by offering guidance in understanding the scope of the headings and GRI. The Explanatory Notes, although not dispositive or legally binding, provide a commentary on the scope of each heading of the HTSUSA, and are generally indicative of the proper interpretation of these headings.

Heading 4202, provides for:

Trunks, suitcases. . .and similar containers; traveling bags. . . jewelry boxes . . . and similar containers, of leather or of composition leather, of sheeting of plastics, of textile materials, of vulcanized fiber, or of paperboard, or wholly or mainly covered with such materials or with paper. (Emphasis added).

The ENs to heading 4202, HTSUSA, state that articles covered by the second part of the heading must be only “of” the materials specified therein or must be “wholly or mainly covered with such materials or with paper.” You agree that the jewelry gift boxes are “covered with paper” and, therefore, meets the criteria in the heading which are repeated in the ENs for classification within heading 4202.

It is your view that the three jewelry boxes at issue are properly classifiable in subheading 4202.99.10, HTSUSA, as paper covered plastic jewelry boxes. In support thereof you cite PD A83181, dated May 6, 1996, in which Customs ruled that a watch box intended for use as packaging for watches in retail sales and suitable for long-term use was a paper covered jewelry box classifiable in subheading 4202.99.1000, HTSUSA. We have reviewed that ruling, and we note that the box is described as "constructed of plastic that is covered with paper." Accordingly it is distinquished from the boxes before us.

The issue before us concerns the subheading under which to classify the jewelry gift box containers. At the six-digit level, the nomenclature classifies the majority of goods in Chapter 42 by the material that comprises the "outer surface." See Headquarters Ruling Letter (HQ) 954021, dated November 1, 1993, citing HQ 087760, dated October 31, 1991, and HQ 087640, dated November 8, 1990. When classifying goods in heading 4202, HTSUSA, it is problematic when the material that comprises the outer layer is a composite material, e.g., the outer layer is composed of a base material of paper that is coated with plastic. Customs addressed this issue in HQ 963618, dated August 2, 2002, wherein Customs explained:

At the four-digit level, heading 4202, HTSUSA, requires that a good be "of" or "wholly or mainly covered with" a specified material. However, at the six-digit level, the nomenclature classifies goods by the material which comprises the "outer surface." . . . In classifying goods such as these, we must distinguish between the requirements of the four- and six-digit headings, since they dictate different criteria for classifying goods.

This distinction was also discussed in HQ 954021, wherein Customs, noting HQ 087760, stated: "Evident in the above are two important distinctions: (1) a covering vs. an outer surface, and (2) classification at the four-digit (or heading) level vs. classification at the six-digit (or subheading) level."

The jewelry gift boxes are covered with plastic coated paper. Thus, at the four digit, or heading level, the box is considered to be "wholly or mainly covered" with paper. However, classification at the six-digit level requires consideration of what material constitutes the outer surface.

Except as noted below, the term “outer surface of” is not defined in Chapter 42, nor anywhere else in the HTSUSA. In HQ 086775, dated July 9, 1990, Customs stated that the outer surface “is that which is both visible and tactile.” Also see, HQ 954021, and the cases cited therein. “Tactile” is defined as follows: “1. Perceptible to the touch: TANGIBLE.” “Tangible” is defined as follows: “1a. Discernible by the touch or capable of being touched.” Webster’s II New Riverside University Dictionary (1984), at 1178 and 1182, respectively. Moreover, for purposes of heading 4202, Customs resolved the issue of what is the “outer surface of” articles made with composite materials. Specifically, we have addressed in a number of rulings whether jewelry box frames, which were made of plastic or metal and were covered with paper backings to which textile materials had been applied, had an outer surface of textiles or paper. See HQ 954021, dated November 1, 1993. In reaching our conclusion in that ruling, we said that Additional U.S. Note 2 of Chapter 42 is instructive in understanding the meaning of “outer surface of” when applied to composite materials (not specifically listed in that note).

Customs interpretation of the term "outer surface of" is consistent with Additional U.S. Note 2 of Chapter 42, HTSUSA, which provides that:

For purposes of classifying articles under subheadings 4202.12, 4202.22, 4202.32, and 4202.92, articles of textile fabric impregnated, coated, covered or laminated with plastics (whether compact or cellular) shall be regarded as having an outer surface of textile material or of plastic sheeting, depending upon whether and the extent to which the textile constituent or the plastic constituent makes up the exterior surface of the article.

Thus, this note explicitly provides the mechanism for making an "outer surface" determination where a textile is impregnated, coated, covered or laminated with plastic. The note expresses the concept of "outer surface" by use of the term "exterior surface." The note is useful in understanding the term "outer surface" when applied to other composite materials. Customs has relied upon this note as guidance when classifying other articles in heading 4202 that are composed of composite materials. Customs application of the note is consistent with the Court of International Trade’s decision in Sarne Handbags Corp. v. United States, 100 F. Supp. 2d 1126; 2000 Ct. Int’l. Trade 51 (2000), wherein the court, applying the note, found that a handbag made of plastic coated textile was classified as having an outer surface of sheeting of plastic.

When applying the definition of "visible and tactile" to goods of heading 4202, HTSUSA, Customs has consistently classified the goods according to the outer-most substance of the composite material at issue. For instance, Customs addressed this same issue as it pertained to jewelry box cases that were covered with a flock-coated paper. Customs concluded, based on the fact that it was the textile flock that was visible and tactile, the jewelry cases had an outer surface of textile materials. See HQ 954021, supra, and HQ 961175, dated July 21, 1998. Similarly, Customs has classified jewelry boxes, a coupon holder, and a "Vanity Train Case" covered with paper that had been coated with sheeting of plastic, as cases having an outer surface of sheeting of plastic. See HQ 960454, dated December 9, 1997 (jewelry box); HQ 961175, supra, (jewelry box); HQ 960990, dated February 3, 1998 (coupon holder); and HQ 960462, dated December 16, 1997 (Vanity Train Case). See also, HQ 086983, dated June 14, 1990 (classifying a jewelry organizer that was covered with a floral textile material that was covered with clear plastic sheeting as having an outer surface of sheeting of plastic).

Moreover, Customs has recently ruled that articles composed of plastic coated leather are considered to have an outer surface of sheeting of plastic. See, HQ 963618, dated August 2, 2002 (classifying a handbag constructed of a combination of split leather covered with a layer of plastic and plastic sheeting backed with textile [imitation leather], as having an outer surface of sheeting of plastic); HQ 960344, dated April 19, 2000 (classifying an attaché case composed of three layers, an outer layer of plastic, a middle layer of composition leather and an inner layer of textile material, as having an outer surface of sheeting of plastic); HQ 960002, dated October 24, 1997 (classifying a tote bag featuring front and back panels manufactured from a composite material of plastic covered layers of leather and composition leather as having an outer surface of sheeting of plastic); and HQ 955515, dated May 5, 1994 (holding that if the leather portions of the bag have a coating of plastic, then the outer surface is of sheeting of plastic). In Sarne the court cited Pillowtex Corp. v. United States, 171 F.3d 1370, 1374 (Fed. Cir. 1999), which held that a tariff term’s correct meaning is its common meaning. It then held that “'sheeting' is material in the form of or suitable for forming into a broad surface of something that is unusually thin, or is a material in the form of a continuous thin covering or coating.” The court found that the outer surface of the merchandise at issue contained a “plastic” or “plastics” component that was exposed, entirely “covered” the textile component, and was relatively thin in comparison to its breadth, and as such the merchandise was correctly classified under the provision for merchandise with an outer surface of ”sheeting of plastics.” The court in Sarne went on to state:

U.S. Note 2 provides support for the Court’s conclusion. While U.S. Note 2 relates only to specific headings within 4202, HTSUS, and therefore, is not binding for determining prima facie classifiability under heading 4202, HTSUS, it is persuasive as to what Congress intended the phrase “sheeting of plastics” to mean in the context of the statute as a whole. Cf. Productol Chem. Co. v. United States, 74 Cust. Ct. 138, 151 (1975) (when the same word or phrase is used in different parts of the same statute it will be presumed to have the same meaning, unless a contrary intent is indicated). Thus, it appears that when “textile fabric [is] impregnated, coated, covered, or laminated with plastics” and “the plastic constituent makes up the exterior surface of the article”, Congress intended the material on the outer surface of the merchandise to be considered a “sheeting of plastics.” See U.S. Note 2.

In the boxes before us here, laboratory analysis of the Skivertex ® and Pellaq™ papers covering the molded plastic boxes found that they are entirely covered with plastic. The samples are boxes whose outer surface contains a plastic or plastics component that is exposed, entirely covers the paper component, and is relatively thin in comparison to its breadth.

Applying the principles set forth in previously cited Headquarters rulings and Sarne, we find that the outer surface of the jewelry boxes before us is "plastic sheeting" under subheading 4202.92, HTSUS. Having determined that the boxes submitted have an outer surface of plastic sheeting, they are classified under subheading 4202.92, HTSUS, which provides for other articles that have an outer surface of sheeting of plastic or textile materials.

HOLDING:

The jewelry gift boxes, style nos. 8914, 7256, and 8910-877, are classified in subheading 4202.92.9060 of the HTSUSA, which provides for “Trunks, suitcases . . . and similar containers; traveling bags. . . jewelry boxes. . . and similar containers, of leather or of composition leather, of sheeting of plastics, of textile materials, of vulcanized fiber, or of paperboard, or wholly or mainly covered with such materials or with paper: Other: With outer surface of sheeting of plastic or of textile materials: Other: Other: Other: Other.” The jewelry gift boxes are dutiable at the general column one rate of duty of 18.1 percent ad valorem.

Sincerely,

Myles B. Harmon, Acting Director
Commercial Rulings Division


Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: