United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1999 NY Rulings > NY D88171 - NY D88229 > NY D88188

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
NY D88188




March 15, 1999

CLA-2-61:S:N:N:REH:HO6 D88188

CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION

TARIFF NO.: 6113.00.1010

Evans, Wood & Caulfield, Inc.
20 West Lincoln Avenue
Valley Stream, NY 11580

Attention: Jill A. Neder

RE: The tariff classification of a jacket from Hong Kong.

Dear Ms. Neder:

In your letter dated February 12, 1999, you requested a tariff classification on behalf of Synergy International. The sample provided is being returned as requested.

A girls hip-length cold weather jacket, representing style #SYN.1234, was submitted for our examination. The shell is made from fabric-backed polyurethane material embossed with a weave-like pattern. The jacket has a full frontal zippered opening, a self fabric stand up collar, and fiberfill insulation quilted to the outside shell. There is a full woven man-made lining and diagonal slash waist pockets on either front panel.

The applicable subheading for the style #SYN.1234, jacket, will be 6113.00.1010, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for Garments, made up of knitted or crocheted fabrics of heading 5903, 5906, or 5907: Having an outer surface impregnated, coated, covered or laminated with rubber or plastics material which completely obscures the underlying fabric... Coats and jackets: Womens or girls... The rate of duty will be 5.7 percent ad valorem.

A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).

Sincerely,

Timothy G. Moran


Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: