United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1998 HQ Rulings > HQ 960954 - HQ 961085 > HQ 961065

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
HQ 961065





June 5, 1998

CLA-2 RR:CR:GC 961065 PH

CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION

TARIFF NO.: 6912.00.10; 6912.00.44; 6912.00.48

Port Director
U.S. Customs Service
C/O Chief, Residual Liquidation and Protest Branch 6 World Trade Center, Room 761
New York, NY 10048-0945

RE: Protest 1001-97-104386; dinnerware; mugs; teapots; stoneware; coarse-grained; fine-grained; ceramic; U.S. Additional Note 5(a), Chapter 69; Import Sales, Inc. v. United States, 65 Cust. Ct. 168 (1970); House Conf. Report 100-576, April 20, 1988

Dear Port Director:

This is our decision on protest 1001-97-104386, against your classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) of certain stoneware dinnerware, mugs, and teapots. Samples were provided.

FACTS:

The merchandise is invoiced as "dinnerware sets" and "stoneware mugs and tea pots". There are letters from the exporter in Hong Kong confirming that the merchandise is "truly stoneware" and absorbs not more than 3% of its weight of water. There is a sample mug, saucer, and bowl, all of standard shapes with a dark blue color. The samples are labeled "stoneware."

The dinnerware was entered on December 17, 1996, with classification under subheading 6912.00.48, HTSUS. The mugs and teapots were entered on January 22, 1997, with classification under subheading 6912.00.10, HTSUS. The entries were liquidated on April 4 and May 30, 1997, respectively, with classification of the dinnerware and teapots under subheading 6912.00.48, HTSUS, and the mugs under subheading 6912.00.44, HTSUS.

The importer's broker filed this protest with Customs on June 18, 1997, against the classification of the merchandise. Stating that the protested entries are of stoneware dinner sets and stoneware mugs and teapots, the protestant notes the definition of "stoneware" in Additional U.S. Note 5(a), Chapter 69, HTSUS, and argues that all of the imported articles meet this definition. The protestant seeks reclassification of the goods under subheading 6912.00.10, HTSUS.

The subheadings under consideration are as follows:

6912.00.10: Ceramic tableware, kitchenware, other household articles and toilet articles, other than of porcelain or china: Tableware and kitchenware: Of coarse-grained earthenware, or of coarse-grained stoneware; of fine-grained earthenware, whether or not decorated, having a reddish-colored body and a lustrous glaze which, on teapots, may be any color, but which on other articles must be mottled, streaked or solidly colored brown to black with metallic oxide or salt.

The 1996 and 1997 general column one rates of duty for goods classifiable under this provision are, respectively, 1.1% and 1% ad valorem.

6912.00.44: Ceramic tableware, kitchenware, other household articles and toilet articles, other than of porcelain or china: Tableware and kitchenware: ... Other: ... Other: ... Other: ... Mugs and other steins.

The 1996 and 1997 general column one rates of duty for goods classifiable under this provision are, respectively, 12.1% and 11.4% ad valorem.

6912.00.48: Ceramic tableware, kitchenware, other household articles and toilet articles, other than of porcelain or china: Tableware and kitchenware: ... Other: ... Other: ... Other: ... Other.

The 1996 and 1997 general column one rates of duty for goods classifiable under this provision are, respectively, 10.8% and 10.5% ad valorem.

ISSUE:

Whether stoneware mugs, teapots, and dinnerware are classifiable as ceramic tableware and kitchenware of coarse-grained stoneware in subheading 6910.00.10, HTSUS, or other ceramic tableware and kitchenware in subheadings 6912.00.44 and 6912.00.48, HTSUS.

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

Initially, we note that the protest was timely filed (i.e., within 90 days after but not before the notice of liquidation; see 19 U.S.C. 1514(c)(3)(A)) and the matter protested is protestable (see 19 U.S.C. 1514(a)(2) and (5)).

The classification of merchandise under the HTSUS is in accordance with the General Rules of Interpretation (GRI's), taken in order. GRI 1 provides that classification is determined according to the terms of the headings and any relative section or chapter notes. GRI 6 provides that for legal purposes, the classification of goods in the subheadings of a heading shall be determined according to the terms of those subheadings and any related subheading notes and, by appropriate substitution of terms, to GRIs 1 through 5, on the understanding that only subheadings at the same level are comparable.

The protestant contends that the merchandise is stoneware, citing Additional U.S. Note 5(a) of Chapter 69, HTSUS. There is no information to the contrary and Customs does not disagree. However, this does not make the merchandise classifiable under subheading 6912.00.10, HTSUS, as claimed by the protestant. Subheading 6912.00.10, HTSUS, covers, in pertinent part, ceramic tableware and kitchenware "of coarse-grained earthenware, or of coarse-grained stoneware; of fine-grained earthenware [meeting certain stated criteria]" (emphasis added). That is, coarse and fine-grained earthenware (the latter meeting certain criteria) are both covered, but only coarse-grained (and not fine-grained) stoneware is covered.

This distinction between coarse-grained and fine-grained earthenware (except for that meeting the stated criteria) and stoneware continues a similar distinction which existed in the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) (see U.S. International Trade Commission Publication 2051 (January 1988), page 205), which were replaced by the HTSUS effective January 1, 1989 (Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988; Public Law 100-418; 102 Stat. 1107). See items 533.11 and 533.15, TSUS, for the treatment under the TSUS of coarse-grained earthenware and stoneware and fine-grained earthenware meeting the same criteria found in subheading 6912.00.10, HTSUS. The headnotes for the part in which the TSUS items are found contained definitions of the terms "coarse-grained" and "fine-grained" (headnote 2(h) and (i), Schedule 5, Part 2, TSUS). According to these definitions, "the term coarse-grained', as applied to ceramic ware, embraces such wares having a body made of materials none of which had been washed, ground, or otherwise beneficiated" and "the term fine-grained', as applied to ceramic wares, embraces such wares having a body made of materials any of which had been washed, ground, or otherwise beneficiated". In Import Sales, Inc. v. United States, 65 Cust. Ct. 168, C.D. 4073 (1970), the Court upheld Customs classification of certain kamado pots as fine-grained. The Court stated that "[t]he terms coarse-grained' and fine-grained', as defined [in the above-quoted headnotes], and as applied to ceramic ware, are objectively tied to the question whether the material in the body has been washed, ground, or otherwise beneficiated. They [the terms] refer not so much to the texture of the product as to the fact that the materials used are either unrefined or refined. ...'" (65 Cust. Ct. at 170.)

Although decisions by the Court interpreting the TSUS are not to be deemed dispositive in interpreting the HTS, "... on a case-by-case basis prior decisions should be considered instructive in interpreting the HTS, particularly where the nomenclature previously interpreted in those decisions remains unchanged and no dissimilar interpretation is required by the text of the HTS" (House Conf. Report 100-576, April 20, 1988, pp. 549-550, 100th Cong., 2d Sess. (1988 U.S.C.C.A.N. 1547, 1582-1583); see also F. L. Smidth & Co. v. United States, 56 CCPA 77, 80, C.A.D. 958, 409 F.2d 1369 (1969)).

In this case, the nomenclature controlling this case (i.e., the distinction between coarse-grained and fine-grained earthenware (with the noted exception) and stoneware) remains unchanged and no dissimilar interpretation is required by the text of the HTSUS. Furthermore, we note that the distinction between coarse-grained and fine-grained earthenware and stoneware, as stated in the above-quoted headnotes to the TSUS, is consistent with the common and commercial meaning and that tariff terms are to be construed in accordance with their common and commercial meanings which are presumed to be the same (Nippon Kogaku, Inc. v. United States, 69 CCPA 89, 92, 673 F.2d 380 (1982); Nylos Trading Company v. United States, 37 CCPA 71, 73, C.A.D. 423 (1949)). For common and commercial meanings in this regard, see The New Encyclopedia Britannica, Macrop‘dia (1975), vol. 14, 892, Pottery, "Except for coarse earthenwares, which can be made from clay as it is found in the earth, pottery is made from special clays plus other materials mixed to achieve the desired results" (at 894); The Encyclopedia Americana, International Ed. (1980), vol. 22, 471, Pottery, "Stoneware clays [have] fewer impurities [i.e., fewer than earthenware clays][;] [a] stoneware body [i.e., the mixture of clays and other materials worked to make the pottery] is usually a compound ..." (at 471). "Because raw clay often contains sand and gravel, before it is used it must be dried, pulverized, mixed with water, and repeatedly sieved to squeeze out the excess water[;] [t]he partially dried clay may then be mixed with other ingredients ..." (at 472); and The Chemistry and Physics of Clays and other Ceramic Materials, Alfred B. Searle and Rex W. Grimshaw (3rd Ed. 1959), Stoneware, distinguishing between coarse stoneware and fine stoneware (at 340-341).

It is uncontested that the merchandise under consideration is stoneware. There is no evidence regarding the body (i.e., the clay or mixture of clays and other materials) used to produce the stoneware. The authorities quoted above regarding pottery and stoneware indicate that stoneware is usually made from beneficiated clay. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary and on the basis of the foregoing authorities, we conclude that the body used to produce the merchandise is made of beneficiated materials. Accordingly, on the basis of the nomenclature of the TSUS provisions which were predecessors to the competing HTSUS provisions, a Court case interpreting that nomenclature (Import Sales, supra), and the common and commercial meaning of the terms involved, we conclude that the merchandise is of other than coarse-grained stoneware. The merchandise is covered by heading 6912, HTSUS (ceramic tableware, kitchenware, other household articles and toilet articles, other than of porcelain or china), and subheading 6912.00, HTSUS (tableware and kitchenware), within heading 6912, HTSUS. Therefore, pursuant to GRIs 1 and 6, the provisions under subheading 6912.00 for ceramic tableware and kitchenware of other than coarse-grained stoneware are applicable. Those provisions are subheading 6912.00.44, HTSUS, for the mugs and 6912.00.48, HTSUS, for the remaining items (in the latter, on the basis of the value information available in the entry papers).

HOLDING:

The stoneware mugs, teapots, and dinnerware are classifiable as other ceramic tableware and kitchenware in subheadings 6912.00.44 (the mugs) and 6912.00.48 (other articles), HTSUS.

The protest is DENIED. In accordance with Section 3A(11)(b) of Customs Directive 099 3550-065, dated August 4, 1993, Subject: Revised Protest Directive, this decision should be mailed, with the Customs Form 19, by your office to the protestant no later than 60 days from the date of this letter. Any reliquidation of the entry in accordance with the decision must be accomplished prior to mailing of the decision. Sixty days from the date of the decision the Office of Regulations and Rulings will take steps to make the decision available to Customs personnel via the Customs Rulings Module in ACS and the public via the Diskette Subscription Service, Freedom of Information Act, and other public access channels.

Sincerely,

John Durant, Director,
Commercial Rulings Division

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: