United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1998 HQ Rulings > HQ 960017 - HQ 960218 > HQ 960110

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
HQ 960110





November 19, 1997

CLA-2 RR:CR:GC 960110 RFA

CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION

TARIFF NO.: 8531.20.00

Port Director
U.S. Customs Service
P.O. Box 2450
San Francisco, CA 94126

RE: Protest 2809-96-101627; Liquid Crystal Devices (LCDs); LCD Displays; Reception Apparatus for Television; Color Video Monitors; Legal Note 1(m) to Section XVI; Headings 8528 and 9013; Sharp Microelectronics Technology, Inc. v. United States, 932 F.Supp. 1499 (CIT 1996), aff'd., 122 F.3d 1446, CAFC Slip Op. 97-1013 (September 2, 1997); HQ 955062

Dear Port Director:

The following is our decision regarding Protest 2809-96-101627, which concerns the classification of liquid crystal devices (LCDs) for color video monitors under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).

FACTS:

The subject merchandise is a color TFT active matrix liquid crystal display (LCD), model 5L-U4E, with a display diagonal of 5 inches. The LCD display screen consists of a 480 x 234 pixel matrix, arranged in a triangular manner. Attached to the LCD is a printed circuit board with driver integrated circuits and a plastic diffuser panel, all of which are encased in a metal housing (bezel). It is claimed that the subject merchandise is to be used as a color video monitor.

The merchandise was entered on May 29, 1996, under subheading 8528.21.65, HTSUS, as a video monitor with a flat panel screen. The entry was liquidated on September 13, 1996, under subheading 9013.80.60, HTSUS, as liquid crystal displays not elsewhere specified. The protest was timely filed on December 10, 1996.

The subheadings under consideration are as follows:

8528.21.65: Reception apparatus for television, whether or not incorporating radiobroadcast receivers or sound or video recording or reproducing apparatus; video monitors and video projectors: [v]ideo monitors: [c]olor: [w]ith a flat panel screen: [o]ther: [w]ith a video display diagonal not exceeding 33.02 cm....

Goods classifiable under this provision have a general, column one rate of duty of 3 percent ad valorem.

8531.20.00 Electric sound or visual signaling apparatus (for example, bells, sirens, indicator panels, burglar or fire alarms). . . :
[i]ndicator panels incorporating liquid crystal devices (LCD's) or light emitting diodes (LED's). . . .

Goods classifiable under this provision have a general, column one rate of duty of 2.1 percent ad valorem.

9013.80.60 Liquid crystal devices not constituting articles provided for more specifically in other headings. . . : [o]ther devices, appliances and instruments: [o]ther. . . .

Goods classifiable under this provision have a general, column one rate of duty of 7.2 percent ad valorem.

ISSUE:

Whether the subject LCDs are classifiable as video monitors, or as signalling apparatus, or as LCDs not specified or included elsewhere, under the HTSUS?

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

Classification of merchandise under the HTSUS is in accordance with the General Rules of Interpretation (GRI's). GRI 1 provides that classification shall be determined according to the terms of the headings and any relative section or chapter notes.

The port classified the subject merchandise under heading 9013, HTSUS. This provision has been interpreted to mean that if the subject merchandise is provided for more specifically in another heading, it would not be classifiable in heading 9013, HTSUS. See Sharp Microelectronics Technology, Inc. v. United States, 932 F.Supp. 1499 (CIT 1996), aff'd., 122 F.3d 1446, CAFC Slip Op. 97-1013 (September 2, 1997). See also HQ 959175, dated November 25, 1996.

The protestant claims that the subject LCD is classifiable under heading 8528, as a video monitor. The term "video monitor" is defined in the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System Explanatory Notes (ENs) which constitute the official interpretation of the HTSUS. While not legally binding, the ENs provide a commentary on the scope of each heading of the HTSUS and are generally indicative of the proper interpretation of these headings. See T.D. 89-80, 54 FR 35127, 35128 (August 23, 1989). EN 85.28, page 1492, states that video monitors are receivers which are "connected directly to the video camera or recorder by means of co-axial cables, so that all of the radio-frequency circuits are eliminated." We find that the subject merchandise cannot be classified under heading 8528 because the protestant did not supply any documentation to support this claim. However, examination of the protestant's sales literature and previous information submitted to Customs indicates that this display is to be used in automobiles for use with global positioning systems (GPS).

In HQ 955062, dated March 21, 1994, Customs determined that LCD modules which have a principal use as global positioning, lottery system, portable data collector, medical instrument, and gasoline pump indicator meet the terms of heading 8531, as signaling apparatus, because they provide certain limited indication information to the user. Based upon HQ 955062, we find that the subject LCD which is principally used for indicating limited location information to the user, is classifiable under heading 8531, as signaling apparatus.

HOLDING:

The Sharp LCD display screen for portable televisions, model 5L-U4E, are classifiable under subheading 8531.20.00, HTSUS, which provides for: "[e]lectric sound or visual signaling apparatus (for example, bells, sirens, indicator panels, burglar or fire alarms) . . . : [i]ndicator panels incorporating liquid crystal devices (LCD's) or light emitting diodes (LED's). . . ." Goods classifiable under this provision have a general, column one rate of duty of 2.1 percent ad valorem.

Because reclassification of the merchandise as indicated above results in a lower rate of duty than claimed, you should GRANT the protest in full. In accordance with Section 3A(11)(b) of Customs Directive 099 3550-065, dated August 4, 1993, Subject: Revised Protest Directive, this decision, together with the Customs Form 19, should be mailed by your office to the protestant no later than 60 days from the date of this letter. Any reliquidation of the entry in accordance with the decision must be accomplished prior to mailing of the decision. Sixty days from the date of the decision the Office of Regulations and Rulings will take steps to make the decision available to Customs personnel via the Customs Rulings Module in ACS and the public via the Diskette Subscription Service, Freedom of Information Act and other public access channels.

Sincerely,

John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: