United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1998 HQ Rulings > HQ 003906 - HQ 114067 > HQ 088120

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
HQ 088120




January 14, 1991

CLA-2 CO:R:C:G 088120 DFC

CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION

TARIFF NO.: 6402.91.4045

District Director of Customs
Thomas P. O'Neill, Jr Federal Building
Boston, MA 02222-1052

RE: Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 0401-90-000398

Dear Sir:

This protest was filed against your decision in the liquidation on February 2, 1990, of various entries covering shipments of women's rubber boots with rubber sole produced in Italy.

FACTS:

The entries involved were liquidated under subheading 6402.91.5060, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United Sates Annotated (HTSUSA), as other footwear with outer soles and uppers of rubber or plastics, covering the ankle, other, footwear designed to be worn over, or in lieu of, other footwear as a protection against water, oil, grease or chemicals or cold or inclement weather. The applicable rate of duty is 37.5 percent ad valorem.

The protestant maintains that these boots are properly classifiable under subheading 6402.91.4045, HTSUSA, as other footwear with outer soles and uppers of rubber or plastics, covering the ankle, having uppers of which over 90 percent of the external surface area (including any accessories or reinforcements such as those mentioned in note 4(a) to this chapter) is rubber or plastics except (1) footwear having a foxing or a foxing-like band applied or molded at the sole and overlapping the upper and (2) except footwear (other than footwear having uppers which from a point 3 cm above the top of the outer sole are entirely of non-molded construction formed by sewing the parts together and having exposed on the
outer surface a substantial portion of functional stitching) designed to be worn over, or in lieu of, other footwear as a protection against water, oil, grease or chemicals or cold or inclement weather. The applicable rate of duty is 6 percent ad valorem.

ISSUE:

Are the uppers of these boots from a point 3 cm above the top of the outer sole entirely of non-molded construction formed by sewing the parts together and having exposed on the outer surface a substantial portion of functional stitching?

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

The uppers of these boots from a point 3 cm above the top of the outer sole are entirely of non-molded construction. The crucial determination here is whether the back seam is functional stitching. An examination of a sample boot reveals that the tape of the inside of the seam does not hold the back together when the seam is removed. Consequently, we consider the stitching as being functional.

HOLDING:

The boots are properly classifiable under subheading 6402.91.4045, HTSUSA, as claimed.

The protest should be allowed. A copy of this decision should be attached to the Form 19 Notice of Action to be sent to the protestant.

Sincerely,

John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division


Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: