United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1997 NY Rulings > NY 896445 - NY 896743 > NY 896606

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
NY 896606





April 13, 1994

CLA-2-59:S:N:N6:350 896606

CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION

TARIFF NO.: 5906.10.0000

Mr. Wency Villaluz
Yusen Air & Sea Service (USA) Inc.
361 North Oak Street
Inglewood, CA 90302

RE: The tariff classification of an adhesive tape from Japan.

Dear Mr. Villaluz:

In your letter dated April 4, 1994, on behalf of Pioneer Electronics Technology, Pomona, California, you requested a tariff classification ruling. The manufacturer is Teraoka-Seisaku Corp., Saitami-Ken, Japan. The shipper is Pioneer Electronics Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.

The instant sample, part no. ZTAA-40, consists of an adhesive tape composed of a woven cotton backing (.16mm thick), which has a rubberized adhesive coating applied to one surface. You state that toluene is the solvent of the adhesive and that the finished thickness of this material is 0.23 + 0.02mm. This tape measures about 1.5" in width and is designed to be stuck around the glass necks of cathode ray tubes for protection. When imported, this product will be shipped in rolls measuring 30 meters in length.

The applicable subheading for the tape will be 5906.10.0000, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for rubberized textile fabrics, ... adhesive tape of a width not exceeding 20cm. The rate of duty will be 5.8 percent ad valorem.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Section 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).

A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction.

Sincerely,

Jean F. Maguire
Area Director

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: