United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1997 HQ Rulings > HQ 734569 - HQ 950310 > HQ 734720

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
HQ 734720




October 22, 1992
MAR-2-05 CO:R:C:V 734720 ER

CATEGORY: MARKING

Mr. William L. Morandini
District Director of Customs
477 Michigan Ave., Room 200
Detroit, Michigan 48226-2568

RE: Country of Origin Marking of Self-Adhesive Plastic Tape Manufactured in the U.S. and Cut to Length and Width in Canada; 19 CFR 134.32(m).

Dear Mr. Morandini:

This is in response to your request for internal advice dated June 9, 1992, regarding the country of origin marking requirements for 3-M self-adhesive tape used in portable or desk top style dispensers which is manufactured in the U.S. and is cut to length and width in Canada.

FACTS:

3-M self-adhesive tape of the type used in portable or desk top style dispensers is manufactured in the U.S. into continuous rolls in varying widths. These "log" rolls will be exported to Canada where they will be cut to the desired length and width. The finished product will be returned to the U.S.

3-M contends that cutting the tape to length and width in Canada does not substantially transform it into a product of Canada and therefore requests an exception to marking pursuant to section 134.32(m), Customs Regulations (19 CFR 134.32(m)).

We have also received a memorandum on this matter from the National Import Specialist Branch 3, New York Seaport. The memorandum states that the operations to be performed in Canada would not constitute a substantial transformation and that the self-adhesive tape would still be considered a product of the United States for purposes of country of origin marking.

ISSUE:

Is self-adhesive tape manufactured in the U.S. into continuous rolls, cut to length and width in Canada and then returned to the U.S., entitled to an exception to marking pursuant to 19 CFR 134.32(m) for American goods exported and returned?

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304), provides that unless excepted, every article of foreign origin imported into the U.S. shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly, and permanently as the nature of the article (or its container) will permit, in such a manner as to indicate to the ultimate purchaser in the U.S. the English name of the country of origin of the article. Congressional intent in enacting 19 U.S.C. 1304 was "that the ultimate purchaser should be able to know by an inspection of the marking on the imported goods the country of which the goods is the product. The evident purpose is to mark the goods so that at the time of purchase the ultimate purchaser may, by knowing where the goods were produced, by able to buy or refuse to buy them, if such marking should influence his will." United States v. Friedlaender & Co., 27 C.C.P.A. 297 at 302 (C.A.D. 104) (1940).

By definition, only merchandise which is "of foreign origin", i.e., of a country of origin other than the U.S., is subject to the requirements of 19 U.S.C. 1304. Stated differently, products of the U.S. are not subject to these requirements. Part 134, Customs Regulations (19 CFR Part 134), implements the country of origin marking requirements and exceptions of 19 U.S.C. 1304. Section 134.1(b), Customs Regulations (19 CFR 134.1(b)), defines "country of origin" as the country of manufacture, production or growth of any article of foreign origin entering the U.S. Further work or material added to an article in another country must effect a substantial transformation in order to render such other country the "country of origin" within the meaning of the marking laws and regulations. The case of U.S. v. Gibson-Thomsen Co., Inc., 27 C.C.P.A. 267 (C.A.D. 98) (1940), provides that an article used in manufacture which results in an article having a name, character or use differing from that of the constituent article will be considered substantially transformed.

Section 134.32(m), Customs Regulations (19 CFR 134.32(m)), provides an exception from marking for U.S. products exported and returned. Products of the U.S. sent abroad for processing fall within this exception unless they are substantially transformed prior to their return to the U.S. See, HQ 732480 (July 31, 1989).

It is therefore necessary to determine whether the U.S. origin self-adhesive tape is substantially transformed when it cut to length and width in Canada. In HQ 729316 (April 20, 1989), abrasive belts manufactured in the U.S. into continuous rolls in varying widths were exported to Mexico where they were cut to proper length (and in some cases, also to width), 3/8 inch of the abrasive was ground off each end, and the two ends were spliced together with an adhesive before being returned to the U.S. There, Customs found that the operations performed in Mexico did not substantially transform them into a product of Mexico.

Similarly in the instant case, we find that cutting the U.S. manufactured self-adhesive tape to length and width in Canada does not substantially transform the tape into a product of Canada. The operations performed in HQ 729316, discussed above, did not result in a substantial transformation and were more extensive in nature than are those in the instant case. Thus, under 19 CFR 134.32(m), the self-adhesive tape is excepted from the country of origin marking requirements of 19 U.S.C. 1304.

HOLDING:

The cutting to length and width of U.S. manufactured self- adhesive tape in continuous rolls is not a substantial transformation. Because the tape remains a product of the U.S., under 19 CFR 134.32(m) it is excepted from the country of origin marking requirements of 19 U.S.C. 1304.

Sincerely,

John Durant, Director

Previous Ruling Next Ruling