United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1996 HQ Rulings > HQ 959261 - HQ 959425 > HQ 959311

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
HQ 959311




June 17, 1996
CLA-2 RR:TC:TE 959311 jb

CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION

Jennifer Mullikin
The Coleman Company, Inc.
3600 N. Hydraulic
Wichita, KS 67219

RE: Country of origin determination for tents; 19 CFR country in which an important assembly occurs

Dear Ms. Mullikin:

This is in reply to your letter dated June 6, 1996, requesting a country of origin determination for certain tents which will be imported into the United States sometime on or after July 1, 1996.

FACTS:

The submitted merchandise consists of a variety of styles of nylon taffeta tents. The manufacturing processes are as follows:

Scenario I

Country A

- material for roof and walls is formed.

Country B

- material for roof and walls is formed.

Country C

- material for floor is formed.

Country D

- cutting, assembly and packing.
Scenario II

Country A

- material for roof and walls is formed.

Country C

- material for floor is formed.

Country D

- cutting, assembly and packing.

Scenario III

Country A

- material for roof and walls is formed.

Country C

- fiberglass poles are formed.

Country D

- cutting, assembly and packing.

Scenario IV

Country A

- material for roof, walls and floor is formed.

Country D

- cutting, assembly and packing.

ISSUE:

What is the country of origin of the subject merchandise?

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

On December 8, 1994, the President signed into law the Uruguay Round Agreements Act. Section 334 of that Act provides new rules of origin for textiles and apparel entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, on and after July 1, 1996. On September 5, 1995, Customs published Section 102.21, Customs Regulations, in the Federal Register, implementing Section 334 (60 FR 46188). Thus, effective July 1, 1996, the country of origin of a textile or apparel product shall be determined by sequential application of the general rules set forth in paragraphs (c)(1) through (5) of Section 102.21.

Paragraph (c)(1) states that "The country of origin of a textile or apparel product is the single country, territory, or insular possession in which the good was wholly obtained or produced." As the subject merchandise is not wholly obtained or produced in a single country, territory or insular possession, in any of the four scenarios, paragraph (c)(1) of Section 102.21 is inapplicable.

Paragraph (c)(2) states that "Where the country of origin of a textile or apparel product cannot be determined under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the country of origin of the good is the single country, territory, or insular possession in which each of the foreign material incorporated in that good underwent an applicable change in tariff classification, and/or met any other requirement, specified for the good in paragraph (e) of this section:"

Paragraph (e) states that "The following rules shall apply for purposes of determining the country of origin of a textile or apparel product under paragraph (c)(2) of this section":

6301-6306 The country of origin of a good classifiable under heading
6301 through 6306 is the country, territory, or insular possession in which the fabric comprising the good was formed by a fabric-making process.

The subject tents are classified in heading 6306, HTSUSA. Of the scenarios you have presented, only in scenarios III and IV is the fabric for the tents formed in a single country. As the "fabric-making" process occurs in a single country, country of origin is conferred by Country A in scenarios III and IV.

Paragraph (c)(3) states that "Where the country of origin of a textile or apparel product cannot be determined under paragraph (c)(1) or (2) of this section":

(i) If the good was knit to shape, the country of origin of the good is the single country, territory, or insular possession in which the good was knit; or

(ii) Except for goods of heading 5609, 5807, 5811, 6213, 6214, 6301 through 6306, and 6308, and subheadings 6209.20.5040, 6307.10, 6307.90, and 9404.90, if the good was not knit to shape and the good was wholly assembled in a single country, territory, or insular possession, the country of origin of the good is the country, territory, or insular possession in which the good was wholly assembled.

As the subject merchandise is not knit, and heading 6306, HTSUSA, is excepted from provision (ii), Section 102.21 (c)(3) is inapplicable.

Section 102.21 (c)(4) states, "Where the country of origin of a textile or apparel product cannot be determined under paragraph (c)(1), (2) or (3) of this section, the country of origin of the good is the single country, territory or insular possession in which the most important assembly or manufacturing process occurred". It is the belief of this office that in the case of the subject tents, in scenarios I and II, the most important manufacturing process occurs at the time of the fabric making. As the fabric for the tents is formed in more than one country, and no one fabric is more important than the other, country of origin cannot be readily determined based on the fabric making process. As such, paragraph (c)(4) is not applicable.

Paragraph (c)(5) states, "Where the country of origin of a textile or apparel product cannot be determined under paragraph (c)(1), (2), (3) or (4) of this section, the country of origin of the good is the last country, territory or insular possession in which an important assembly or manufacturing process occurred. Accordingly, in the case of scenarios I and II, country of origin is conferred by the last country in which an important assembly occurred, that is, Country D.

HOLDING:

In scenarios I and II, the country of origin of the subject tents is Country D.

In scenarios III and IV, the country of origin of the subject tents is Country A.

The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in section 19 CFR 177.9(b)(1). This sections states that a ruling letter, either directly, by reference, or by implication, is accurate and complete in every material respect.

Should it be subsequently determined that the information furnished is not complete and does not comply with 19 CFR 177.9(b)(1), the ruling will be subject to modification or revocation. In the event there is a change in the facts previously furnished, this may affect the determination of country of origin. Accordingly, if there is any change in the facts submitted to Customs, it is recommended that a new ruling request be submitted in accordance with 19 CFR 177.2.

Sincerely,

John Durant, Director

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: