United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1996 HQ Rulings > HQ 959031 - HQ 959256 > HQ 959179

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
HQ 959179




May 9, 1996
CLA-2 RR:TC:TE 959179 jb

CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION

Donna Van Den Broeke
Kamino International Transport, Inc.
514 Eccles Avenue
South San Francisco, CA 94080

RE: Country of origin determination for tents; 19 CFR or manufacturing process occurred

Dear Ms. Van Den Broeke:

This is in reply to your letter dated April 17, 1996, on behalf of Jinwoong Inc., requesting a country of origin determination for certain tents which will be imported into the United States sometime on or after July 1, 1996.

FACTS:

The submitted merchandise consists of cabin and dome tents comprised of raw materials or components sourced from multiple countries. The manufacturing process is as follows:

CABIN TENT

Scenario I

China

- fabric for the wall and canopy is sourced.

Korea

- fabric for the roof, window and floor is sourced.

Dominican Republic or Sri Lanka

- tents are assembled.

DOME TENT

Scenario II

China

- fabric for the wall and fly is sourced.

Korea

- fabric for the wall, fly, window and floor is sourced.

Dominican Republic or Sri Lanka

- tents are assembled.

ISSUE:

What is the country of origin of the subject merchandise?

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

On December 8, 1994, the President signed into law the Uruguay Round Agreements Act. Section 334 of that Act provides new rules of origin for textiles and apparel entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, on and after July 1, 1996. On September 5, 1995, Customs published Section 102.21, Customs Regulations, in the Federal Register, implementing Section 334 (60 FR 46188). Thus, effective July 1, 1996, the country of origin of a textile or apparel product shall be determined by sequential application of the general rules set forth in paragraphs (c)(1) through (5) of Section 102.21.

Paragraph (c)(1) states that "The country of origin of a textile or apparel product is the single country, territory, or insular possession in which the good was wholly obtained or produced." As the subject merchandise is not wholly obtained or produced in a single country, territory or insular possession, paragraph (c)(1) of Section 102.21 is inapplicable.

Paragraph (c)(2) states that "Where the country of origin of a textile or apparel product cannot be determined under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the country of origin of the good is the single country, territory, or insular possession in which the foreign material incorporated in that good underwent an applicable change in tariff classification, and/or met any other requirement, specified for the good in paragraph (e) of this section."

Paragraph (e) states that "The following rules shall apply for purposes of determining the country of origin of a textile or apparel product under paragraph (c)(2) of this section:"

6301-6306 The country of origin of a good classifiable under heading
6301 through 6306 is the country, territory, or insular possession in which the fabric comprising the good was formed by a fabric-making process.

The subject tents are classified in heading 6306, HTSUSA. In the two scenarios you describe in your submission none of the fabric for the tents' outer shell is sourced in a single country. Accordingly, the terms of the tariff shift are not applicable.

Paragraph (c)(3) states that "Where the country of origin of a textile or apparel product cannot be determined under paragraph (c)(1) or (2) of this section":

(i) If the good was knit to shape, the country of origin of the good is the single country, territory, or insular possession in which the good was knit; or (ii) Except for goods of heading 5609, 5807, 5811, 6213, 6214, 6301 through 6306, and 6308, and subheadings 6209.20.5040, 6307.10, 6307.90, and 9404.90, if the good was not knit to shape and the good was wholly assembled in a single country, territory, or insular possession, the country of origin of the good is the country, territory, or insular possession in which the good was wholly assembled.

As the subject merchandise is not knit, and heading 6306, HTSUSA, is excepted from provision (ii), Section 102.21 (c)(3) is inapplicable.

Section 102.21 (c)(4) states, "Where the country of origin of a textile or apparel product cannot be determined under paragraph (c)(1), (2) or (3) of this section, the country of origin of the good is the single country, territory or insular possession in which the most important assembly or manufacturing process occurred". It is the opinion of this office that in the case of the subject tents, the most important manufacturing process occurs at the time of the fabric making. As the fabric for the tents is sourced in more than one country, and no one fabric is more important than the other, country of origin cannot be readily determined based on the fabric making process. As such, paragraph (c)(4) is not applicable.

Paragraph (c)(5) states, "Where the country of origin of a textile or apparel product cannot be determined under paragraph (c)(1), (2), (3) or (4) of this section, the country of origin of the good is the last country, territory, or insular possession in which an important assembly or manufacturing process occurred." We assume for the purposes of this ruling that the De Minimis rule (see Section 102.13) does not apply to the fabrics sourced in China and Korea. Accordingly, in the case of scenarios I and II, country of origin is conferred by the last country in which an important assembly occurred, that is, the Dominican Republic or Sri Lanka.
HOLDING:

In scenarios I and II the country of origin of the subject tents is the Dominican Republic or Sri Lanka.

The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in section 19 CFR 177.9(b)(1). This sections states that a ruling letter, either directly, by reference, or by implication, is accurate and complete in every material respect.

Should it be subsequently determined that the information furnished is not complete and does not comply with 19 CFR 177.9(b)(1), the ruling will be subject to modification or revocation. In the event there is a change in the facts previously furnished, this may affect the determination of country of origin. Accordingly, if there is any change in the facts submitted to Customs, it is recommended that a new ruling request be submitted in accordance with 19 CFR 177.2.

Sincerely,

John Durant, Director
Tariff Classification Appeals

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: