United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1996 HQ Rulings > HQ 559510 - HQ 559720 > HQ 559613

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
HQ 559613




May 3, 1996

MAR-02 RR:TC:SM 559613 MLR

CATEGORY: MARKING

Mr. Robert Ledlow
Walls Industries, Inc.
1905 N. Main
Cleburne, TX 76031

RE: Country of Origin Marking; Waterproof Garments; 19 CFR Part 12.130; 19 CFR 102.21

Dear Mr. Ledlow:

This is in reference to your letter of October 26, 1995, to the New York Seaport, requesting a ruling concerning the country of origin marking on waterproof garments. Additional information was submitted on April 23, 1996.

FACTS:

It is stated that shell fabric, consisting of either 100 percent nylon or 100 percent polyester laminated to Gore-tex, zippers, care labels, bar code tags, bag stickers, and other I.D. tags, all of U.S. origin, will be shipped to Hong Kong and China. In Hong Kong, the fabric is cut into various jacket components, and in China, the fabric is cut into various pants components. The components cut in Hong Kong, along with lining (100 percent nylon taffeta and 100 percent nylon mesh for the upper body portion of the jacket) and trimmings of Hong Kong origin will be shipped to China where they will be assembled into rain jackets, stated to be classifiable under subheading 6210.20.10, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Subheading 6210.20.10, HTSUS, has been superseded by subheading 6210.20.50, HTSUS. The components cut in China and lining will be assembled into rain pants, stated to be classifiable under subheading 6210.40.10, HTSUS. Subheading 6210.40.10, HTSUS, has been superseded by subheading 6210.40.50, HTSUS.

The rain jackets feature a three-piece hood with a visor and a drawstring, two large covered zippered pockets, a rolled hem with an adjustable drawstring, a front zipper covered by a storm fly that snaps, and raglan sleeves with a hook and loop take-up tab at the cuff. The rain pants feature a combination elastic/drawstring at the waist, concealed suspender buttons inside the waist, knee length leg zippers, seamless side seam leg construction, and bottom leg snaps. The finished waterproof garments will then be imported into the U.S. Two shipments will be imported in May 1996, and another will be imported after July 1, 1996. In a telephone conversation on May 2, 1996, you stated that the jackets to be imported in May, contain a sewn-in label at the inside center of the neck midway between the shoulder seams, a hang-tag, and a sticker on the outside plastic packaging with the markings "Made in Hong Kong."

ISSUE:

What are the country of origin marking requirements of the imported waterproof garments?

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

The marking statute, section 304, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304), provides that unless excepted, every article of foreign origin imported in the U.S. shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly, and permanently as the nature of the article (or its container) will permit, in such a manner as to indicate to the ultimate purchaser in the U.S. the English name of the country of origin of the article. Congressional intent in enacting 19 U.S.C. 1304 was "that the ultimate purchaser should be able to know by an inspection of the marking on the imported goods the country of which the goods is the product. The evident purpose is to mark the goods so that at the time of purchase the ultimate purchaser may, by knowing where the goods were produced, be able to buy or refuse to buy them, if such marking should influence his will." United States v. Friedlaender & Co. Inc., 27 CCPA 297, 302, C.A.D. 104 (1940).

Part 134, Customs Regulations (19 CFR Part 134), implements country of origin marking requirements and exceptions of 19 U.S.C. 1304. Because the articles in question are textile products subject to section 204 of the Agricultural Act of 1956, as amended
(7 U.S.C. 1854), and you plan to import one shipment in May 1996, section 12.130(d) and (e), Customs Regulations {19 CFR 12.130(d) and (e)}, will still be applicable. Section 12.130, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 12.130), provides that a textile product that is processed in more than one country or territory shall be a product of that country or territory where it last underwent a substantial transformation. A textile or textile product will be considered to have undergone a substantial transformation if it has been transformed by means of substantial manufacturing or processing operations into a new and different article of commerce. See 19 CFR 12.130(b).

According to 19 CFR 12.130(d)(1), a new and different article of commerce will usually result from a manufacturing or processing operation if there is a change in: (i) commercial designation or identity, (ii) fundamental character, or (iii) commercial use. According to 19 CFR 12.130(d)(2), the following will be considered in determining whether merchandise has been subjected to substantial manufacturing or processing operations: (i) the physical change in the material or article; (ii) the time involved; (iii) the complexity of the operations; (iv) the level or degree of skill and/or technology required; and (v) the value added to the article in each country or territory.

Section 12.130(e), Customs Regulations {19 CFR 12.130(e)}, describes various processes that will confer origin. One of those processes is the "cutting of fabric into parts and the assembly of those parts into the completed article." 19 CFR 12.130(e)(1)(iv). Pursuant to 19 CFR 12.130(e)(1)(iv), the country of origin of the pants to be entered in May 1996 will be China because both the cutting of the components and the assembly will occur in China. Accordingly, the label submitted containing the marking "Made in China" will be appropriate.

Another process that confers origin is where "substantial assembly by sewing and/or tailoring of all cut pieces of apparel articles which have been cut from fabric in another foreign country ... into a completed garment" takes place. 19 CFR 12.130(e)(1)(v). This is contrasted with other processes set forth at 19 CFR 12.130(e)(2) which do not result in a change in origin, such as the joining together by sewing of otherwise completed knit-to-shape component parts produced in another country. See 19 CFR

The difference between 19 CFR 12.130(e)(1)(v) and 19 CFR 12.130(e)(2)(iii) has to do with the nature of the assembly operation. If there is substantial sewing involved (or tailoring) of the kind performed in the sewing of suit jackets, suits, and shirts, the process usually will fall within the former subsection. If the sewing involved is characterized as simple, such as where "otherwise completed knit-to-shape component parts" are merely sewn together, the process usually will fall within the latter subsection. In this latter regard, Customs has long held that the mere assembly of goods entailing simple combining operations, trimming, or joining by sewing is not enough to substantially transform the components of an article into a new and different article of commerce. See Headquarters Ruling Letter (HRL) 951259, dated April 3, 1992, HRL 082787, dated March 9, 1989, and HRL 082747, dated February 23, 1989.

In HRL 952639 dated February 22, 1994, Customs considered the country of origin of men's and women's lined water-resistant jackets which were assembled in country B from pieces of fabric produced, cut and made up in Taiwan. Even though some sub-assembly work occurred in Taiwan, such as the assembly of the collar, cuffs, sweep bottom, front placket, and warmer quilting, it was held that the country of origin of the finished jackets was country B since this was where there was a complete assembly of the component parts that made up the garment, and there was a substantial assembly as opposed to a simple sewing procedure.

In this case, the waterproof jackets appear to be similar to those considered in HRL 952639. Furthermore, the jackets are lined, are totally assembled in China, and no subassembly operations will be performed in Hong Kong, unlike HRL 952639 where some sub-assembly work occurred in Taiwan. Accordingly, we conclude that for the jackets to be entered in May 1996, the country of origin for marking purposes will be China pursuant to 19 CFR 12.130(e)(1)(v). You have indicated that 15,000 jackets planned for shipment in May already contain the marking "Made in Hong Kong." In T.D. 54640(6), 93 Treas. Dec. 301 (1958), Customs determined that wearing apparel, such as shirts, blouses, coats, sweaters, etc., must be legibly and conspicuously marked with the name of the country of origin by means of a fabric label or label made from natural or synthetic film sewn or otherwise permanently affixed on the inside center of the neck midway between the shoulder seams or in that immediate area or otherwise permanently marked in that area in some other manner. To the extent that you are unable to replace the labels, including the sewn-in labels, it will be acceptable for purposes of
19 U.S.C. 1304 and T.D. 54640(6) to place a sticker with the marking "Made in China" over any "Made in Hong Kong" markings including those on the sewn-in labels, as we find that it would be economically prohibitive, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1304(a)(3)(C), to cut out and replace 15,000 sewn-in labels. However, the stickers must remain on the jackets until they reach the ultimate purchaser.

For the jackets and pants to be entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, on and after July 1, 1996, the general rules set forth in paragraphs (c)(1) through (5) of section 102.21, Customs Regulations, which implement section 334 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act will be used to determine the country of origin for country of origin marking purposes. See 60 FR 46188 (September 5, 1995). Section 102.21(c)(1), Customs Regulations {19 CFR 102.21(c)(1)}, states that "the country of origin of a textile or apparel product is the single country, territory, or insular possession in which the good was wholly obtained or produced." As the jackets and pants are not wholly obtained or produced in a single country, territory, or insular possession, paragraph (c)(1) of section 102.21 is inapplicable.

Section 102.21(c)(2), Customs Regulations {19 CFR 102.21(c)(2)}, provides:

[w]here the country of origin of a textile or apparel product cannot be determined under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the country of origin of the good is the single country, territory, or insular possession in which each foreign material incorporated in that good underwent an applicable change in tariff classification, and/or met any other requirement, specified for the good in paragraph (e) of this section.
In this case, the jackets are classifiable under subheading 6210.20.50, HTSUS, and the rain pants are classifiable under subheading 6210.40.50, HTSUS. The rule set forth under paragraph (e) for the jackets, classifiable under subheading 6210.20.50, HTSUS, and the pants, classifiable under subheading 6210.40.50, HTSUS, provides:

6210-6212 (1) If the good consists of two or more component parts, a change to an assembled good of heading 6210 through 6212 from unassembled components, provided that the change is the result of the good being wholly assembled in a single country, territory, or insular possession....

Section 102.21(e), 6210-6212(1) is applicable because the jackets and pants consist of two or more component parts, and the component parts are changed to an assembled good of heading 6210 as a result of being wholly assembled in China. Accordingly, pursuant to 19 CFR 102.21, the country of origin of the jackets and pants for country of origin marking purposes will be China. Therefore, the label submitted containing the marking "Made in China" will be appropriate.

HOLDING:

On the basis of the information submitted, the country of origin of the jackets and pants will be China for country of origin marking purposes pursuant to 19 CFR 12.130(e)(1)(v) and 19 CFR 12.130(e)(1)(iv), respectively, for the shipments to be entered May 1996, and 19 CFR 102.21(c)(2) for all shipments to be entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, on and after July 1, 1996.

The designated textile and apparel category may be subdivided into parts. If so, the visa and quota requirements applicable to the subject merchandise may be affected. Since part categories are the result of international bilateral agreements which are subject to frequent renegotiations and changes, to obtain the most current information available, we suggest you check, close to the time of shipment, the Status Report On Current Import Quotas (Restraint Levels), an internal issuance of the U.S. Customs Service which is updated weekly and is available for inspection at your local Customs office.

Due to the changeable nature of the statistical annotation (the ninth and tenth digits of the classification) and the restraint (quota/visa) categories, you should contact your local Customs office prior to importation of this merchandise to determine the current status of any import restraints or requirements.

The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in section 177.9(b)(1), Customs Regulations {19 CFR 177.9(b)(1)}. This section states that a ruling letter is issued on the assumption that all of the information furnished in the ruling letter, either directly, by reference, or by implication, is accurate and complete in every material respect.

Should it be subsequently determined that the information furnished is not complete and does not comply with 19 CFR 177.9(b)(1), the ruling will be subject to modification or revocation. In the event there is a change in the facts previously furnished, this may affect the determination of country of origin. Accordingly, it is recommended that a new ruling request be submitted in accordance with section 177.2, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 177.2).

A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time the goods are entered. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction.

Sincerely,

John Durant, Director

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: