HQ 226309 - Protest No. 2304-95-100053; Interest; Effective Date; Retroactivity; North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Implementation Act; Customs Modernization Act; 19 U.S.C. 1505(c); 19 U.S.C. 1514 - United States International Trade Commision Rulings

United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule

faqs.org Rulings By Number Rulings By Category Tariff Numbers

faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1996 HQ Rulings > HQ 226089 - HQ 226535 > HQ 226309

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
HQ 226309

October 6, 1995

ENT-1-03/LIQ-1-R:C:E 226309 IOR

CATEGORY: LIQUIDATION

Port Director
U.S. Customs Service
P.O. Box 3130
Laredo, Texas 78044

RE: Protest No. 2304-95-100053; Interest; Effective Date; Retroactivity; North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Implementation Act; Customs Modernization Act; 19 U.S.C. 1505(c); 19 U.S.C. 1514

Dear Sir:

The above-referenced protest was forwarded to this office for further review. We have considered the evidence provided, and the points raised, by your office and the protestant. Our decision follows.

FACTS:

According to the file, the nine entries which are the subject of the protest, were filed from March 8, 1989 to June 7, 1991. Although the protest refers to liquidation on January 6, 1995, from the file it appears that all nine entries were reliquidated on January 6, 1995. The protest was filed on March 29, 1995. The protestant states that when duties in connection with these entries were refunded, interest was not paid. The protestant contends that the duties should have been refunded with interest, on the basis of the amendment to 19 U.S.C. 1505(c), effected by section 642(a), Title VI, Public Law 103-182 (the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act; 107 Stat. 2557, 2205). Further review was requested and granted.

ISSUE:

May the protest in this case be granted?

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

Initially, we note that the protest, with application for further review, was timely filed under the statutory and regulatory provisions for protests (see 19 U.S.C. 1514 and 19 CFR Part 174). We note that the issue protested is a protestable issue (19 U.S.C. 1514(a)(3), (5); see also Syva Co. v. United States, 12 CIT 199, 681 F. Supp. 885 (1988)).

At issue in this protest is whether the amendment to 19 U.S.C. 1505(c) effected by section 642(a), Title VI, Public Law 103-182, is effective to entries filed before the effective date of that law but liquidated or reliquidated after the effective date of the law. As stated in the FACTS portion of this ruling, the entries under consideration were filed from March 8, 1989 to June 7, 1991. The effective date of Title VI of Public Law 103-182 is the date of enactment (December 8, 1993). The entries under consideration were reliquidated on January 6, 1995.

Customs has thoroughly considered the applicability of the amendment to 19 U.S.C. 1505(c) effected by section 642(a), Title VI, Public Law 103-182. Customs position is that the amendment applies only to entries filed on or after December 8, 1993, and not to entries filed before December 8, 1993, and liquidated or reliquidated on or after that date. Enclosed is a copy of our ruling HQ 225576 so holding. This ruling is incorporated (by reference) into this protest decision and made a part of it. A copy of ruling HQ 225576 should be mailed with the Customs Form 19 to the protestant, as provided below. On the basis of ruling HQ 225576, the protest under consideration must be DENIED.

This ruling addresses only the effective date of the amendment to 19 U.S.C. 1505(c) effected by section 642(a), Title VI, Public Law 103-182, and not the substantive application of that provision.

HOLDING:

The protest is DENIED because the amendment to 19 U.S.C. 1505(c) effected by section 642(a), Title VI, Public Law 103-182 (107 Stat. 2057, 2205), applies only to entries filed on or after December 8, 1993, and not to entries filed before December 8, 1993, and liquidated or reliquidated on or after that date (see ruling HQ 225576, copy enclosed).

In accordance with Section 3A(11)(b) of Customs Directive 099 3550-065, dated August 4, 1993, Subject: Revised Protest Directive, this decision should be mailed by your office, with the Customs Form 19, to the protestant no later than 60 days from the date of this letter. Any reliquidation of the entry in accordance with the decision must be accomplished prior to mailing of the decision. Sixty days from the date of the decision the Office of Regulations and Rulings will take steps to make the decision available to Customs personnel via the Customs Rulings Module in ACS and the public via the Diskette Subscription Service, Freedom of Information Act, and other public access channels.

Sincerely,

Director, International

Previous Ruling Next Ruling