United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1995 NY Rulings > NY 810965 - NY 811081 > NY 811074

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
NY 811074





June 2, 1995

CLA-2-56:S:N:N6:350 811074

CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION

TARIFF NO.: 5603.00.9050

Mr. J. Richard Mallon
JRM Associates, Inc.
21 Delaware Avenue
Claymont, Delaware 19703-1901

RE: The tariff classification of a hydroentangled spunlaced nonwoven fabric from Finland.

Dear Mr. Mallon

In your letter dated May 23, 1995, on behalf of JW Suominen OY of Finland, you requested a tariff classification ruling.

While you did not furnish a representative sample, you describe the product as a hydroentangled spunlace composed of a blend of rayon and polyester staple man-made fibers. While your letter indicates a composition of 2/3 rayon and 1/2 polyester, we assume you mean 2/3 rayon and 1/3 polyester. A sample would be helpful if you anticipate any future ruling requests.

You ask about the dutiable status of this material if such material is converted into wiping cloths in the U.S. and then shipped to Japan. Duty on imported goods is always assessed at the full rate under the applicable tariff classification provision. While there is generally no reduction on imported duties, in this type of situation, drawback or certain refunding may be possible. We suggest that you write to the drawback section at this address and provide them will full details concerning the converting, packaging and shipping operation and inquire as to what documentation would be required to obtain any kind of drawback allowance.

The applicable subheading for the product, will be 5603.00.9050, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for nonwovens, whether or not impregnated, coated, covered or laminated, obtained by mechanical entanglement, of staple fibers. The rate of duty will be 10 percent ad valorem.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Section 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).

A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction.

Sincerely,

Jean F. Maguire
Area Director
New York Seaport

Previous Ruling Next Ruling