United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1995 NY Rulings > NY 803476 - NY 803610 > NY 803503

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
NY 803503




December 14, 1994

CLA-2-34:S:N:N7:236 803503

CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION

TARIFF NO.: 3402.11.5050

Ms. Joan M. Stiefel
Vice President, U.S. Division
Stiefel Laboratories, Inc.
P.O. Box 10855
Rockville, Maryland 20849-0855

RE: The tariff classification of TENCAB (Surface Active Agent) from Cayman Islands, B.W.I..

Dear Ms. Stiefel:

In your letter dated October 7, 1994, you requested a tariff classification ruling.

The prospective import, TENCAB contains the following ingredients:

Sodium and potassium alkysulphate +/-47%
Superfatting and binder agents +/-46%
Silica < 1%
Chloride < 0.1%

The U.S. Customs Service Laboratory described this product as white waxy chips and granules, a preparation of an organic non- aromatic anionic surface active agent. According to the importer, it is used in the manufacture of toilet soap.

The applicable subheading for the TENCAB will be 3402.11.5050, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for organic surface-active agents (other than soap); surface-active preparations, washing preparations(including auxiliary washing preparations) and cleaning preparations, whether or not containing soap, other than those of heading 3401:... Organic surface-active agents whether or not put up for retail sale:... Other:... Other. The rate of duty will be 3.7 percent ad valorem.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Section 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).

A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction.

Sincerely,

Jean F. Maguire
Area Director

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: