United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1994 HQ Rulings > HQ 0954346 - HQ 0954483 > HQ 0954475

Previous Ruling Next Ruling



HQ 954475


October 21, 1993

CLA CO:R:C:T 954475 jb

CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION

Mr. Alpha Chou
Ho Sing Clothing Co., Ltd.
7-1 FL.
695, Tung Hwa South Rd.
CTCI Tower
Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.

RE: Country of Origin determination for wedding dress

Dear Mr. Chou:

This letter is in response to your inquiry of June 7, 1993, requesting a country of origin determination for a wedding dress. Cut pieces for the wedding dress before assembly, and a completed wedding dress after assembly, were submitted to this office for examination.

FACTS:

The completed wedding dress is referred to as Style number ED223B. The cut pieces you sent included:

1. cut panels of materials, among which include, 100 percent polyester satin, 100 percent polyester taffeta, marquisette.

2. 26 pairs of laces

3. all other accessories, among which include, imitation pearls, sequins, zipper, labels, webbings, elastics, fish bone, wrapped buttons, horse hair, hook and eye closures, adhesive web.

The operations in Taiwan involve material sourcing and purchasing, designing, pattern making, size grading, marker making and fabric cutting. The cut panels, laces and accessories are then sent to the Philippines or other third country for purposes of assembly, finishing and packing. The completed article is then sent directly from the Philippines or other third country to the United States.

ISSUE:

What is the country of origin of the merchandise at issue?

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

Section 12.130 of the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 12.130) sets forth the principles of country of origin for textiles and textile products subject to Section 204 of the Agricultural Act of 1956, as amended (7 U.S.C. 1854).

Pursuant to 19 CFR 12.130(b), the standard of substantial transformation governs the country of origin determination where textiles and textile products are processed in more than one country. The country of origin of textile products is deemed to be that foreign territory or country where the article last underwent a substantial transformation. Substantial transformation is said to occur when the article has been transformed into a new and different article of commerce by means of substantial manufacturing or processing.

The factors to be applied in determining whether or not a manufacturing operation is substantial are set forth in 19 CFR 12.130(d). Section 12.130(e)(1) describes manufacturing or processing operations from which an article will usually be considered a product of the country in which those operations occurred. Section 12.130(e)(1)(iv) provides that an article or material usually will be a product of a particular foreign territory or country when there has been both a cutting of fabric into parts and the assembly of those parts into the completed article.

Section 12.130(e)(1)(v) states that an article will be a product of a particular foreign country, when it has undergone prior to importation into the U.S. in that foreign country:

Substantial assembly by sewing and/or tailoring of all cut pieces of apparel articles which have been cut from fabric in another foreign territory or country, or insular possession, into a completed garment (e.g., the complete assembly of all cut pieces of suit-type jackets, suits and shirts).

We have previously held that cutting of fabric into pattern pieces constitutes a substantial transformation of the fabric, resulting in the apparel pieces becoming a product of the country where the fabric is cut. Customs has also held that the mere assembly of goods entailing simple combining operations, trimming or joining together by sewing is not enough to substantially transform the components of an article into a new and different article of commerce. (See HQ 082747, dated February 23, 1989; HQ 086665, dated March 23, 1990; HQ 951169, dated April 1, 1992; HQ 951437, dated July 17, 1992)

It is our opinion that the sewing operation performed in the Philippines or other third country goes beyond a simple assembly operation. The sewing involves the complexity contemplated by Section 12.130(e)(1)(v), as for example, that found in the assembly and tailoring of all cut pieces of suit-type jackets, suits and shirts.

The assembly executed in the Philippines or other third country, materially changes the garment from the constituent garment parts to the finished product by means of a substantial assembly and constitutes a substantial transformation in the country of assembly. The manufacturing operation falls squarely within the language of Section 12.120(e)(1)(v).

HOLDING:

The country of origin of the submitted merchandise, Style number ED223B, is the Philippines or other third country. It is at the assembly process, in the Philippines or other third country, that the textile product undergoes a substantial transformation and is transformed into a new and different article of commerce.

The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in Section 177.9(b)(1), Customs Regulations (19 CFR 177.9(b)(1)). This section states that a ruling letter is issued on the assumption that all of the information furnished in the ruling letter, either directly, by reference, or by implication, is accurate and complete in every material respect.

Should it be subsequently determined that the information furnished is not complete and does not comply with 19 CFR 177.9(b)(1), the ruling will be subject to modification or revocation. In the event there is a change in the facts previously furnished this may affect the determination of country of origin. Accordingly, it is recommended that a new ruling request be submitted in accordance with Section 177.2, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 177.2).

Sincerely,

John Durant, Director

Previous Ruling Next Ruling