United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1994 HQ Rulings > HQ 0954346 - HQ 0954483 > HQ 0954361

Previous Ruling Next Ruling



HQ 954361


November 2, 1993

CLA-2 CO:R:C:M 954361 MBR

CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION

TARIFF NO.: 8471.93.20

District Director
U.S. Customs Service
555 Battery St.
P.O. Box 2450
San Francisco, CA 94126

RE: Protest No. 2809-93-100500; Tandem XL80 Hard Disk Drive Storage Unit; Automatic Data Processing (ADP) Machine Storage Device; HQs 952952, 951008, 950238, 089330, 085946

Dear District Director:

This is our response to Protest Number 2809-93-100500, regarding the classification of the XL80 Tandem Computer ADP disk drive unit, under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The subject merchandise was entered on September 22, 1993, and the entry was liquidated on January 4, 1993. The protest was timely filed on March 16, 1993.

FACTS:

The instant merchandise is a hard disk drive unit for the XL80 Disk Storage Facility. Up to eight XL80 hard disk drive units are rack mounted in the disk storage facility. The disk storage facility contains the interfaces and power supplies for the disk drive units.

However, the hard disk drives are imported separately. They consist of a disk spindle assembly, which is mounted in the hard disk assembly ("HDA"). A hub is attached to the top of the spindle, and eight 9-inch platters are clamped to the hub. The spindle is driven at 3600 RPM by a direct coupled brushless DC motor. Also located in the HDA are the rotary actuator assembly (with closed loop servo control), read/write heads, filters, and an electronic printed circuit board which directs the servo signal from the servo disk and data to or from a platter. Other printed circuit boards within the disk drive provide the electronics for read/write functions, servo control, and driver/receiver electronics. The Winchester technology disk drive employs a
carriage locking mechanism when power is removed.

The Computer Glossary, Alan Freedman (1983), defines a "Winchester Disk" as follows:

A Winchester disk is a sealed disk technology that was developed by IBM, which incorporates the access arm, read/write heads and disk platters into a sealed unit. By aligning the read/write heads to their own set of disks, greater storage capacities and accessing speeds are obtainable than with removable disk cartridges. The Winchester disk was originally designed as a dual 30-megabyte configuration, and its 30-30 specification, the same as a Winchester rifle, gave rise to its name. Although originally a self-contained, removable module, the term is used today to refer to any fixed hard disk.

The XL80 storage units are self-contained in their own housing. Tandem places the disk drives on a specially designed chassis to facilitate slide in/out installation and removal. Each drive unit with its chassis weighs approximately 75 pounds.

The subheadings under consideration are as follows:

8471.93.15 Automatic data processing machines and units thereof: Storage units, whether or not entered with the rest of a system: Magnetic disk drive units: For a disk of a diameter exceeding 21 cm: Units for physical incorporation into automatic data processing machines or units thereof. (Free rate of duty)

8471.93.20 Automatic data processing machines and units thereof: Storage units, whether or not entered with the rest of a system: Magnetic disk drive units: For a disk of a diameter exceeding 21 cm: Other. (3.7% rate of duty)

ISSUE:

Whether the separately imported XL80 disk drive units are classifiable under the provision for storage units for physical incorporation, or under the provision for other units?

LAW & ANALYSIS:

The General Rules of Interpretation (GRI's) to the HTSUS govern the classification of goods in the tariff schedule. GRI 1 states, in pertinent part:

...classification shall be determined according to the terms of the headings and any relative section or chapter notes...

In HQ 952952, dated October 26, 1993, HQ 951008, dated May 14, 1992, HQ 950238, dated November 26, 1991, HQ 089330, dated October 7, 1991, and HQ 085946, dated January 2, 1990, we addressed the classification of similar rack mounted disk drive units (see also HQ 088747, dated October 25, 1993). In those rulings we stated that:

The determination of a unit's state of completion is made by determining the state of the unit itself and not the final "completed systems" in which they will ultimately function. They are fully assembled, have cooling apparatus and their own power sources. To make them fully functional one need only plug them in. In fact, it is clear that the only purpose of rack-mounting the units together is for the convenience of proximity in connecting them together with cables and, perhaps, space consolidation. Thus, it is our view that these units are complete.

Whether separate or joined, each is complete in and of itself and each is a distinct and separate commercial entity. The most that can be said is that they may (or may not) be used together with another particular type of unit of a data processing system, one as support for the other. It does not make them, for tariff classification purposes, a "part" of the ultimate automatic data processing system. United States v. Willoughby Camera Stores, Inc., 21 CCPA 322, T.D. 46075 (1933).

The fact that each unit at issue requires the attachment of another article in order to be capable of performing its function does not render each of them a "part," in that there is no requirement that a machine must be "self-activating." Nord Light, Inc. v. United States, 49 CCPA 12, C.A.D. 786 (1961). Although incapable of functioning unless placed in configuration with certain other devices, they nevertheless are, in and of themselves, peripheral machines used in conjunction with data processing machines, specifically provided for....Westinghouse Electric International Co. v. United States, 28 Cust. Ct. 209, C.D. 1411 (1952), cited with approval by Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp., Inter- Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. v. United States, 53 CCPA 122, 126, C.A.D. 887 (1966). Furthermore, the fact that they are designed to share a common "rack-mounting" does not mandate their classification as a part. General Electric Company v. United States, 2 CIT 84 (1981).

Therefore, even though the XL80 disk drive units do not contain their own power supply or fan cooling, they are not classifiable under the provision for "parts." Chapter 84, Legal

Note 5(B) delineates requirements for the classification of machines as ADP "units":

(B) Automatic data processing machines may be in the form of systems consisting of a variable number of separately housed units. A unit is to be regarded as being a part of the complete system if it meets all of the following conditions:

(a) It is connectable to the central processing unit either directly or through one or more other units; and

(b) It is specifically designed as part of such a system (it must, in particular, unless it is a power supply unit, be able to accept or deliver data in a form (code or signals) which can be used by the system).

The XL80 disk drives meet the Chapter 84, Legal Note 5(B) requirements for ADP "units" since they are connectable to the CPU through the interface and they accept and deliver data in a form which can be used by the system.

The XL80 disk drives are designed to be mounted in a rack enclosure which consists of a cabinet, power supply, fan cooling, and interface. Clearly the rack enclosure itself does not meet the Chapter 84, Legal Note 5(B) requirements for ADP units since the rack itself is not connectable to the CPU and the rack itself is not able to deliver data in a form which can be used by the system. In fact, the rack enclosure would be classifiable in subheading 8473.30.40, HTSUS, which provides for parts and accessories of ADP machines. When the XL80 disk drives are installed in the rack, the rack would then be classifiable as an ADP unit since the disk drives are connectable to the CPU and are able to deliver data. However, the rack enclosure itself is not classifiable as an ADP unit. Thus, the XL80 disk drives cannot be said to be units suitable for physical incorporation into automatic data processing machines or units thereof since the rack is not an ADP unit.

Therefore, the Tandem XL80 ADP disk drive storage unit is classifiable under subheading 8471.93.20, HTSUS, which provides for: "[a]utomatic data processing machines and units thereof: [s]torage units, whether or not entered with the rest of a system: [m]agnetic disk drive units: [f]or a disk of a diameter exceeding 21 cm: [o]ther."

The protestant cites HQ 950238, dated November 26, 1991, regarding ADP tape storage units which were held classifiable in subheading 8471.93.50, HTSUS. However, this is different merchandise involving different tariff provisions. Therefore, HQ 950238 is not precedential for the current classification question.

HOLDING:

The Tandem XL80 ADP disk drive storage unit, is classifiable under subheading 8471.93.20, HTSUS, which provides for: "[a]utomatic data processing machines and units thereof: [s]torage units, whether or not entered with the rest of a system: [m]agnetic disk drive units: [f]or a disk of a diameter exceeding 21 cm: [o]ther." The rate of duty is 3.7% ad valorem.

For the reasons stated above, this protest should be denied in full. In accordance with Section 3A(11)(b) of Customs Directive 099 3550-065, dated August 4, 1993, Subject: Revised Protest Directive, this decision, together with the Customs Form 19, should be mailed by your office to the protestant no later than 60 days from the date of this letter. Any reliquidation of the entry in accordance with this decision must be accomplished prior to the mailing of this decision. Sixty days from the date of this decision the Office of Regulations and Rulings will take steps to make this decision available to Customs personnel via the Customs Rulings Module in ACS and the public via the Diskette Subscription Service, Lexis, Freedom of Information Act and other public access channels.

Sincerely,


Previous Ruling Next Ruling