HQ 0952752 - Country of Origin determination for pajamas - United States International Trade Commision Rulings

United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule

faqs.org Rulings By Number Rulings By Category Tariff Numbers

faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1993 HQ Rulings > HQ 0952716 - HQ 0952810 > HQ 0952752

HQ 952752

February 3, 1993

CLA CO:R:C:T 952752 jb

CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION

Mr. Herb Tischler
Inner World
30 East 33rd. Street
New York, NY 10016

RE: Country of Origin determination for pajamas

Dear Mr. Tischler:

This letter is in response to your inquiry of September 22, 1992, requesting a country of origin determination for a pair of pajamas. A sample was submitted to this office for examination.

FACTS:

The submitted sample consists of a pair of pajamas, referred to as Style number 80225. You state in your letter that the fabric will be cut to pattern in Australia. The parts, trim and labels will be sewn together in the Philippines, where the embroidery and applique will also be added. The finished pajamas will then be packed and exported to the United States.

ISSUE:

What is the country of origin of the merchandise at issue?

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

Section 12.130 of the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 12.130) sets forth the principles of country of origin for textiles and textile products subject to Section 204 of the Agricultural Act of 1956, as amended (7 U.S.C. 1854).

Pursuant to 19 CFR 12.130(b), the standard of substantial transformation governs the country of origin determination where textiles and textile products are processed in more than one country. The country of origin of textile products is deemed to be that foreign territory or country where the article last underwent a substantial transformation. Substantial transformation is said to occur when the article has been transformed into a new and different article of commerce by means of substantial manufacturing or processing. The factors to be applied in determining whether or not a manufacturing operation is substantial are set forth in 19 CFR 12.130(d). Section 12.130(e)(1) describes manufacturing or processing operations from which an article will usually be considered a product of the country in which those operations occurred. Section 12.130(e)(1)(iv) provides that an article or material usually will be a product of a particular foreign territory or country when there has been both a cutting of fabric into parts and the assembly of those parts into the completed article.

Section 12.130(e)(1)(v) states that an article will be a product of a particular foreign country, when it has undergone prior to importation into the U.S. in that foreign country:

Substantial assembly by sewing and/or tailoring of all cut pieces of apparel articles which have been cut from fabric in another foreign territory or country, or insular possession, into a completed garment (e.g., the complete assembly of all cut pieces of suit-type jackets, suits and shirts).

We have previously held that cutting of fabric into pattern pieces constitutes a substantial transformation of the fabric, resulting in the apparel pieces becoming a product of the country where the fabric is cut. Customs has also held that the mere assembly of goods entailing simple combining operations, trimming or joining together by sewing is not enough to substantially transform the components of an article into a new and different article of commerce. (See HQ 082747, dated February 23, 1989; HQ 086665, dated March 23, 1990; HQ 951169, dated April 1, 1992; HQ 951426, dated April 8, 1992; HQ 951424, dated April 24, 1992; HQ 951425, dated April 24, 1992; HQ 951437, dated July 17, 1992 HQ 952223, dated October 26, 1992).

The assembly operation performed in the Philippines involves the simple assembly of several cut pattern pieces to form the pajamas. The sewing does not involve the complex sewing operation contemplated by Section 12.130(e)(1)(v), as for example, that found in the assembly and tailoring of all cut pieces of suit- type jackets, suits and shirts.

Neither the assembly of the parts, nor the attachment of the trim, embroidery, and applique, performed in the Philippines, change the article into a new and different article. It is the cutting operation in Australia which materially changes the garment into designated garment parts and consequently constitutes a substantial transformation of that fabric, in Australia.

HOLDING:

The country or origin of the submitted merchandise, Style 80225, is Australia. It is at the cutting process, in Australia, that the textile product undergoes a substantial transformation and is transformed into a new and different article of commerce. That is the last substantial transformation of the goods in question.

The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in Section 177.9(b)(1), Customs Regulations (19 CFR 177.9(b)(1)). This section states that a ruling letter is issued on the assumption that all of the information furnished in the ruling letter, either directly, by reference, or by implication, is accurate and complete in every material respect.

Should it be subsequently determined that the information furnished is not complete and does not comply with 19 CFR 177.9(b)(1), the ruling will be subject to modification or revocation. In the event there is a change in the facts previously furnished this may affect the determination of country of origin. Accordingly, it is recommended that a new ruling request be submitted in accordance with Section 177.2, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 177.2).

Sincerely,

John Durant, Director

Previous Ruling Next Ruling