United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1993 HQ Rulings > HQ 0223198 - HQ 0223539 > HQ 0223502

Previous Ruling Next Ruling



HQ 223502


April 22, 1992

DRA-4-CO:R:C:E 223502 CB

CATEGORY: ENTRY DRAWBACK

Regional Director
Commercial Operations Division
U. S. Customs Service
One World Trade Center
Suite 534
Long Beach, CA 90831-0700

RE: Internal Advice Request regarding Nike, Inc.; Certificates of Delivery; 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1); 19 CFR 191.65

Dear Madame:

This is in response to your internal advice request (your file DRA-1-O:C:T MW) dated October 8, 1991 wherein you requested our answer to the three questions posed by NIKE, Inc. Subsequently, by way of memorandum dated March 13, 1992 you withdrew two of the questions and requested that we address the remaining question. Our response is limited to same condition drawback.

FACTS:

Nissho Iwai American Corp. (NIAC) serves as NIKE, Inc.'s financier and importer of record on virtually all importations of NIKE product into the United States. NIKE takes possession of all product immediately after it clears customs. It is stated that the product is never physically in the possession of NIAC. All invoices from production factories show the purchaser as "Nissho Iwai American Corp. for the account of NIKE, Inc." The Entry Summary lists NIKE, Inc. as the ultimate consignee.

According to NIKE, at the time of importation, the products are placed in a distribution facility where they are held until an order is received from a customer. If the customer is outside the United States, the ownership of the goods is then transferred to NIKE International Ltd. (NIL), a wholly owned subsidiary of NIKE, Inc., which handles the sales of all NIKE product outside the United States. The goods are then exported by NIL to the customer and a same condition drawback claim is filed.

ISSUE:

1) Whether a Certificate of Delivery is required between the ultimate consignee and the importer of record?

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

Section 1313(j)(1), Title 19, United States Code generally provides for a refund of duty if a duty-paid article is exported in the same condition as when imported, or is destroyed under Customs supervision, within three years from date of importation, and was not used in the United States.

Customs administration of the drawback laws is governed by Part 191, Customs Regulations. More specifically, 19 CFR 191.141 (b)(1), provides that an exporter-claimant filing a same condition drawback claim must furnish a copy of the import entry or identify the import entry, date of entry, and port of entry. It also provides that transfers shall be documented by certificates of delivery pursuant to 19 CFR 191.65. Certificates of delivery are required in order to identify the imported, duty- paid merchandise which is the basis for drawback, and to prevent an overpayment of drawback.

The answer to Nike's question is yes. In the instant case, all of the entry documentation is filed by NIAC as importer of record. Therefore, under the regulation, NIAC must supply a certificate of delivery to enable Customs to trace the merchandise from the custody of the importer to the custody of the exporter. See section 191.141 (b)(1) of the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 191.141(b)(1)).

HOLDING:

Certificates of Delivery, in the form of a completed CF 331, are required when the importer is not the exporter of the imported duty-paid merchandise which is the basis of a same condition drawback claim.

Sincerely,


Previous Ruling Next Ruling