United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1993 HQ Rulings > HQ 0112134 - HQ 0112398 > HQ 0112134

Previous Ruling Next Ruling



HQ 112134


September 17, 1992

BOR-7-07-CO:R:IT:C 112134 BEW

CATEGORY: CARRIER

Mr. Patrick K. McCooey
Mitsubishi International Corp.
520 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10022

RE: Eligibility of certain flex tanks to be designated as instruments of international traffic (IIT)

Dear Mr. McCooey:

This is in reference to your letter dated April 28, 1992, requesting that certain flex tanks be designated as instruments of international traffic (IIT).

FACTS:

You state that you anticipate bringing flex tanks into the United States to be used for transporting frozen concentrate. These tanks will arrive from Japan empty, be filled with frozen juice concentrate and returned to Japan. You state that the flex tanks's dimensions and weight are as follows:

Empty (folded) 1050 X 1050 X 730mm, 100kg Loaded 1050 X 1050 X 1320mm.

The flex tanks have a steel frame, a polyvinyl chloride plastic outer surface, and the inner bag (which is disposable) is made of polyethylene plastic. The flex tanks will be imported empty into the United States through the port of Seattle/Tacoma, Washington. You state that repeated use of the tanks is anticipated.

ISSUE:

Whether the described flex tanks used for the transportation of liquid commodities and transportation and storage of grain, chilled beef, cocoa butter, etc., may be treated as instruments of international traffic within the meaning of 19 U.S.C. 1322(a) and section 10.41a of the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 10.41a). LAW AND ANALYSIS:

Section 322(a), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1322(a)), provides that "[v]ehicles and other IIT, of any class specified by the Secretary of the Treasury, shall be granted the customary exceptions from the application of the customs laws to the extent and subject to such terms and conditions as may be prescribed in regulations or instructions of the Secretary of the Treasury."

The Customs Regulations issued under the authority of section 322(a) are in section 10.41a (19 CFR 10.41a). Paragraph (a)(l) of section 10.41a designates as IIT lift vans, cargo vans, shipping tanks and certain other named articles and states that other articles may be designated as IIT by the Commissioner of Customs in decisions to be published in the weekly Customs Bulletin. Once designated as instruments of international traffic, these items may be released without entry or the payment of duty, subject to the provisions of section 10.41a.

To qualify as an "instrument of international traffic" within the meaning of 19 U.S.C. 1322(a) and the regulation promulgated pursuant thereto (19 CFR 10.41a et seq.), an article must be used as a container or holder. The article must be substantial, suitable for and capable of repeated use, and used in significant numbers in international traffic. (See subheading 9803.00.50, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA), and former Headnote 6(b)(ii), Tariff Schedules of the United States (HTSUS), as well as Headquarters Decisions 104766; 108084; 108658; 109665; and 109702).

The concept of reuse contemplated above is for commercial shipping or transportation purposes, and not incidental or fugitive uses. Tariff Classification Study, Sixth Supplemental Report (May 23, 1963) at 99. See Holly Stores, Inc. v. United States, 697 F.2d 1387 (Federal Circuit, 1982).

In Holly Stores, supra, the court determined that "reuse" in the context of former General Headnote 6(b)(ii) "has been consistently interpreted to mean practical, commercial reuse, not incidental reuse." (Emphasis added). In that case, articles of clothing were shipped into this country on wire or plastic coat hangers. Evidence showed that the hangers were designed to be, and were of fairly durable construction and that it would be physically possible to reuse them. However, the court found that only about one percent of the hangers were reused in any way at all, and that those uses were of a noncommercial nature. The court held that the uses of these hangers beyond shipping them once from overseas to the United States were purely incidental, and concluded that the hangers were "not designed for, or capable of, reuse". Subsequent Customs rulings on this matter have held that single use is not sufficient; reuse means more than twice (Headquarter rulings 105567 and 108658). Furthermore, it is our position that the burden of proof to establish reuse is on the applicant, even though the applicant may not be the party reusing the instrument.

We find that the flex tanks under consideration are steel tanks capable of being used as a container or holder, that they are substantial, suitable for and capable of repeated use, and that they will be used in significant numbers in international traffic. We further find that the flex tanks under consideration are similar to certain tanks used for the transportation of apple juice which were designated as instruments of international traffic in Treasury Decision 78-212.

The designation of a container or holder as an IIT becomes effective only when used as such upon its arrival in this country in foreign trade, either empty or with merchandise. If the holder or container is brought into the country by a party other than the one who is using it as an IIT, it is subject to entry as imported merchandise. The principal on the IIT bond is the party who is using the holder or container as an IIT.

HOLDING:

The flex tanks under consideration qualify for treatment as instruments of international traffic and may be released under the procedures set forth in section 10.41a, Customs Regulations.

Sincerely,

B. James Fritz

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: