United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1992 HQ Rulings > HQ 0112009 - HQ 0112144 > HQ 0112116

Previous Ruling Next Ruling



HQ 112116


March 16, 1992

BOR-7-04-CO:R:IT:C 112116 GEV

CATEGORY: CARRIER

J.A. Saquetti
J.A. Saquetti Transporting
5 Agate Rd., Unit 301
North York - Ontario - Canada M3M 2B2

RE: Instruments of International Traffic; Canadian-based Truck Transiting the United States; 19 U.S.C. 1322

Dear Mr. Saquetti:

This is in response to your undated letter requesting a ruling regarding the proposed transportation of cars through the United States by a truck owned by your company. Our ruling is set forth below.

FACTS:

J.A. Saquetti Transporting is a Canadian-based car carrier operating primarily in Ontario, Canada. This carrier has been contacted by prospective used car buyers from Central America interested in buying cars from Canada. This transaction would involve the movement of cars by truck from Ontario to Central America via the United States. In transiting the United States the truck carrying the cars would enter and exit the United States at Niagara Falls, New York, and Laredo, Texas, respectively.

ISSUE:

Whether the transportation of merchandise by a Canadian- based truck from Canada through the United States en route to Central America constitutes local traffic in violation of 19 CFR

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

Section 141.4, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 141.4), provides that entry as required by title 19, United States Code, 1484(a) (19 U.S.C. 1484(a)), shall be made of every importation whether free or dutiable and regardless of value, except for intangibles and articles specifically exempted by law or regulations from the
requirements for entry. Since the Canadian-based equipment in question is not within the definition of intangibles as shown in General Note 4, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS; 19 U.S.C. 1202, as amended), it is subject to entry and payment of any applicable duty if not specifically exempted by law and regulations.

Instruments of international traffic may be entered without entry and payment of duty under the provisions of 19 U.S.C. 1322. To qualify as instruments of international traffic, trucks having their principal base of operations in a foreign country must be arriving in the United States with merchandise destined for points in the United States, or arriving empty or loaded for the purpose of taking merchandise out of the United States (see 19 CFR 123.14(a)).

Generally speaking, a foreign truck tractor which arrives in the United States in international traffic towing a foreign trailer, either empty or loaded, constitutes a foreign "truck" as that term is used in 123.14(a), (b), and (c)(1), Customs Regulations (19 CFR 123.14(a), (b), and (c)(1)). It should be noted, however, that in regard to truck tractors, whether they stay connected to their respective trailers or separate, the same restrictions set forth in the aforementioned regulatory authority would nonetheless apply.

Section 123.14(c), Customs Regulations, states that with one exception, a foreign-based truck, admitted as an instrument of international traffic under 123.14, shall not engage in local traffic in the United States. The exception, set out in 123.14(c)(1), states that such a vehicle, while in use on a regularly scheduled trip, may be used in local traffic that is directly incidental to the international schedule.

A carrier may be considered as engaged in regularly scheduled service whether trips are scheduled hourly, daily, weekly, etc., provided the trips are regular, not varied, and are over an established route. Trips made if and when a load is available do not qualify.

Section 123.14(c)(2), Customs Regulations, provides that a foreign-based truck trailer admitted as an instrument of international traffic may carry merchandise between points in the United States on the return trip as provided by 123.12(a)(2) which allows use for such transportation as is reasonably incidental to its economical and prompt departure for a foreign country. Section 123.14(c)(2) applies only to trailers and not to tractor-trailer units which, as stated above, are considered trucks as that term is used in the Customs Regulations.

Section 10.41(d), Customs Regulations, which provides, in part, that any foreign-owned vehicle brought into the United States for the purpose of carrying merchandise between points in the United States for hire or as an element of a commercial transaction, except as provided for in 123.14(c), is subject to treatment as an importation of merchandise from a foreign country and a regular Customs entry therefore shall be made. Section 123.14(d), Customs Regulations, provides that any vehicle used in violation of 123.14, is subject to forfeiture under 592, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1592).

Whether the use of an instrument of international traffic constitutes a diversion from international traffic is based on the facts in each case. The transportation of merchandise in international traffic is the key; the domestic movement of merchandise must be secondary to the international movement and meet other criteria. There must be a regular international schedule and the domestic movement must follow the same basic route as the merchandise moving in international traffic.

In regard to the regulations promulgated pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1322 discussed above, we note that Treasury Decision (T.D. 83-118), published in the Federal Register on May 25, 1983 (48 FR 23384) amended 19 CFR 123.12(a)(2) to provide that foreign railroad equipment other than locomotives may be used on an outward trip in such trains or for such local traffic as is reasonably incidental to its economical and prompt departure for a (any) foreign country. The "outward" trip, then, would no longer refer exclusively to a return trip to the country in which the railroad equipment began its run. The equipment might return, or it might proceed to another foreign country.

The purpose of the amendments to 19 CFR 123.12 set forth in T.D. 83-118 was to allow a three country movement (Canada-U.S.- Mexico, or reverse) of foreign locomotives and railroad equipment in international traffic, and thus not subject those locomotives or that equipment to formal entry or duty. A conforming amendment to 19 CFR 123.14(c)(2) cross-referencing 19 CFR 123.12(a)(2) was also contained in T.D. 83-118. This conforming amendment changed the wording of the local traffic exemption for a foreign-based truck trailer from "...on the return trip to the country from which it entered the United States..." to "...on its departure for a foreign country..." Notwithstanding the three country movement above, the substance of the regulation, as counsel suggests, remains essentially the same.

In regard to the facts now under consideration, it is apparent that the proposed three country movement of cars by a Canadian-based truck from Ontario, Canada to Central America, transiting the United States, does not involve the transportation
of merchandise between points in the United States and is solely a movement in international traffic. Accordingly, there is no movement in local traffic in violation of 19 CFR 123.14(c)(1)

HOLDING:

The transportation of merchandise by a Canadian-based truck from Canada through the United States en route to Central America does not constitute a movement in local traffic in violation of 19 CFR 123.14(c)(1) and/or (2).

Sincerely,

B. James Fritz

Previous Ruling Next Ruling