HQ 0111614 - Vessel Repair; Heavy Weather; PRESIDENT MADISON; Entry No. 335-0100590-5; 19 U.S.C. 1466; 19 C.F.R. 4.14(d)(1)(iii). - United States International Trade Commision Rulings

United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule

faqs.org Rulings By Number Rulings By Category Tariff Numbers

faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1992 HQ Rulings > HQ 0111571 - HQ 0111693 > HQ 0111614

HQ 111614

August 5, 1991

VES-13-18 CO:R:IT:C 111614 JBW

CATEGORY: CARRIER

Chief, Technical Branch
Commercial Operations
Pacific Region
1 World Trade Center
Long Beach, CA 90831

RE: Vessel Repair; Heavy Weather; PRESIDENT MADISON; Entry No. 335-0100590-5; 19 U.S.C. 1466; 19 C.F.R. 4.14(d)(1)(iii).

Dear Sir:

This letter is in response to your memorandum of March 26, 1991, which forwards for our review the application for relief filed in conjunction with the above-referenced vessel repair entry.

FACTS:

The record reflects that the subject vessel, the PRESIDENT MADISON, arrived at the port of Seattle, Washington, on December 29, 1990. Vessel repair entry, number 335-0100590-5, was filed on January 4, 1991. The entry indicates that foreign repairs were made to the vessel to repair damages caused by heavy weather encountered by the vessel during the voyage of the vessel from Seattle, Washington, to Yokohama, Japan, through Dutch Harbor, Alaska.

The documentation submitted indicates that the damages occurred between November 26, 1990, and December 1, 1990, and that further damages occurred between December 2, 1990, and December 6, 1990. The vessel log and damage reports indicate that the vessel encountered force six to eleven winds, force six to nine seas, and force five to eight swells.

ISSUE:

Whether the evidence submitted demonstrates that the repairs performed to the ship in a foreign shipyard were necessitated by stress of weather and were necessary to secure the safety and seaworthiness of the vessel.

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

Title 19, United States Code, section 1466, provides in pertinent part for payment of duty in the amount of 50 percent ad valorem on the cost of foreign repairs to vessels documented under the laws of the United States to engage in foreign or coastwise trade, or vessels intended to engage in such trade. The statute provides for the remission of the above duties in those instances where good and sufficient evidence is furnished to show that foreign repairs were compelled by "stress of weather or other casualty" and were necessary to secure the safety and seaworthiness of the vessel to enable her to reach her port of destination. 19 U.S.C. 1466(d)(1).

Customs Regulations require that certain supporting evidence be submitted with an application for relief for damages resulting from stress of weather. This evidence includes photocopies of the relevant parts of the vessel's logs, certification of any claimed casualty by the master or other responsible vessel officer with personal knowledge of the facts, and a certification by the master that the repairs were necessary for the safety and seaworthiness of the vessel to enable her to reach her port of destination in the United States. 19 C.F.R.

In Treasury Decision 78-180, we set out guidelines to be used when relief is requested on the basis that the vessel encountered high winds. T.D. 78-180, 12 Cust. B. & Dec. 382 (1978). We held that winds of force 9 on the Beaufort Scale, a numerical scale rating winds according to ascending velocity from zero (calm) to twelve (hurricane), accompanied by a reasonable description of the conditions and verified as required in the regulations, raise a presumption that damages caused were due to stress of weather. Id. The damage reports filed by the ship's master and the vessel log indicate winds of up to force 11. The log entries during the periods during which the damages occurred frequently note that the vessel was "pitching moderately to heavily" in "very rough seas." This evidence appears sufficient to support the applicant's claim that the damages for which relief is sought resulted from the weather conditions described.

As noted above, to claim remission because of stress of weather, the applicant must demonstrate not only that the foreign repairs were compelled by stress of weather, but also that the repairs were necessary for the safety and seaworthiness of the vessel. Such evidence may take the form of a certificate furnished by the master as required by the regulation. Notwithstanding claims in the applicant's letter of February 20, 1991, the record in this case does not contain certification or any other statement by the master that the repairs were necessary for the safety and seaworthiness of the vessel to enable her to reach her United States port of destination. The application for relief, therefore, must be denied.

HOLDING:

This evidence appears sufficient to support the applicant's claim that the damages for which relief is sought resulted from the weather conditions described. However, absent a certification or other statement by the master that the repairs were necessary for the safety and seaworthiness of the vessel, the foreign work for which the applicant seeks relief is dutiable under 19 U.S.C. 1466.

Sincerely,

B. James Fritz
Chief

Previous Ruling Next Ruling