United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1991 NY Rulings > NY 0862986 - NY 0863121 > NY 0863004

Previous Ruling Next Ruling


NY 863004

May 16, 1991

CLA-2-62:S:N:N:3-I:360 863004

CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION

TARIFF NO.: 6206.30.3040

Mr. Bruce Schiller
Joseph & Schiller Inc.
8725 N.W. 18th Terrace
Suite 301
Miami, FL 33172

RE: The tariff classification of a woman's blouse from Colombia.

Dear Mr. Schiller:

In your letter dated April 29, 1991, on behalf of your client, The Hartwell Company, you requested a classification ruling. Although you state that "The garment is to be produced in Colombia from fabric cut-to-pattern in the United States", your inquiry poses no questions concerning the eligibility for entry at reduced duty under the provisions of heading 9802.00.80, HTS.

The submitted sample, style number A1408324, is a woman's snug-fitting, sleeveless blouse, manufactured from 100% cotton, woven fabric. The garment has a full frontal opening secured by five buttons, a sweetheart neckline, and front panels which are pointed at the bottom. The sample is being returned under separate cover.

The applicable subheading for the blouse will be 6206.30.3040, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for women's cotton blouses. The rate of duty will be 16.4 percent ad valorem.

The blouse falls within textile category designation 641. Based upon international textile trade agreements, products of Colombia are not presently subject to visa requirements or quota restraints.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Section 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).

A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction.

Sincerely,

Jean F. Maguire

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: