United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1990 HQ Rulings > HQ 0544060 - HQ 0544282 > HQ 0544256

Previous Ruling Next Ruling



HQ 544256


November 15, 1988

CLA-2 CO:R:C:V 544256 EK

CATEGORY: VALUATION

Mark R. Kopp
Sr. Customs/Freight Admin.
233 Broadway
New York, New York 10279-0099

RE: Ruling Request Regarding Depreciation of Assists

Dear Sir:

This is in response to your letter of October 19, 1988, requesting a ruling as to the proper valuation of certain assists which your company (importer) is providing to the seller of imported merchandise.

FACTS:

The importer is considering importing leather shoe uppers from the People's Republic of China. The imported uppers will be lasted and soled by one of six domestic companies. The importer will be providing to the Chinese factory, free of charge, manufacturing machinery. The machinery is 12-15 years old and has been fully depreciated by the importer in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

ISSUE:

What is the proper valuation of the machinery sent abroad, free of charge, to the seller?

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

As you correctly indicate, the machinery is con- sidered an assist pursuant to section 402(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (TAA; 19 U.S.C. 1401a(h)). Regarding the value of the assist, section 152.103(d)(1) and (2), Customs Regulations (19 CFR 152.103(d)(1) and (2)), states that, depending upon
the type of assist, the value is either the cost of its acquisition or the cost of its production. In either case, the value of the assist includes transportation costs to the place of production.

It is possible to depreciate an assist to a zero value. In Headquarters Ruling No. 543233 dated August 9, 1984, the books and records of the importer reflected a zero value for a mold in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. In that case, we held that the value of the assist was limited to the costs and expenses incurred in transporting the assist to the place of production.

In this case, if in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the value of the assist has been fully depreciated according to the importer's records, then the value of the assist will be equal to the cost of transporting the assist to the place of production.

Sincerely,

John Durant, Director,

Previous Ruling Next Ruling