United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1990 HQ Rulings > HQ 0083348 - HQ 0083452 > HQ 0083444

Previous Ruling Next Ruling



HQ 083444


July 07, 1989

CLA-2:CO:R:C:G 083444 SR

CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION

TARIFF NO.: 6402.19.10; 700.56; 700.57

Mr. Robert D. Stang
Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz & Silverman 12 East 49th Street
New York, New York 10017

RE: Reconsideration of HRL 080791 and HRL 080792 and classification of golf shoes

Dear Mr. Stang:

This is in reference to your letter dated January 11, 1989, requesting reconsideration of HRL 080791 and HRL 080792 dated December 2, 1987, and requesting tariff classification of golf shoes under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA).

FACTS:

The merchandise at issue is golf shoes. The shoes are made of Clarino imitation leather. Some of the shoes are made by cement construction, others are made by California construction. The upper components of the shoe are lightly cemented before each stitching stage to hold the components together during the stitching stages. The uppers have a lining to provide comfort and a rear quarter interlining to help stiffen the rear quarter of the shoe. Because this shoe is waterproof the interlining is plastic and the back side of the stitched seams are coated with waterproofing cement. The outer sole of the shoe has spikes. Style 58149 has a foxing-like band.

ISSUE:

1. Whether the shoes at issue are classifiable under item 700.53, Tariff Schedule of the United States (TSUS).

2. What is the classification under the HTSUSA?

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

ISSUE 1

HRL's 080791 and 080792 dated December 2, 1987, classified the golf shoes at issue under item 700.53, TSUSA. Item 700.53, TSUSA, provides for footwear (whether or not described elsewhere in this subpart) which is over 50 percent by weight of rubber or plastics or over 50 percent by weight of fibers and rubber or plastics with at least 10 percent by weight being rubber or plastics, hunting boots, galoshes, rainwear, and other footwear designed to be worn over, or in lieu of, other footwear as a protection against water, oil, grease, or chemicals or cold or inclement weather, all the foregoing having soles and uppers of which over 90 percent of the exterior surface area is rubber or plastics (except footwear with uppers of nonmolded construction formed by sewing the parts thereof together and having exposed on the outer surface a substantial portion of functional stitching), other.

In HRL 080791 and HRL 080792, the merchandise at issue was classified under item 700.53, TSUS, because the shoes are both stitched and glued. The reasoning was that if the shoes are both stitched and glued then they are "more than" stitched and therefore, the stitching cannot be considered to be functional stitching. We now feel that just because stitching is backed by glue it does not mean that the stitching cannot be functional. It is the stitching in these shoes that hold the shoes together. According to the importer the glue is added to the back of the stitching in order to make the seams waterproof.

Under the TSUS, the merchandise at issue is classifiable under item 700.56, except for style 58149 which has a foxing-like band and is classifiable under item 700.57, TSUS.

ISSUE 2

Under the HTSUSA, the shoes at issue are classifiable under 6402.19.90, which provides for other footwear with outer soles and uppers of rubber or plastics, sports footwear, other, valued over $12 a pair. The shoes cannot be classified under subheading 6402.19.10, HTSUSA, which provides for sports footwear with uppers over 90 percent of rubber or plastics (except footwear designed to be worn over, or in lieu of other footwear as a protection against water, oil, grease or chemicals or cold or inclement weather), because they are waterproof and therefore fit the exception.

HOLDING:

ISSUE 1

The golf shoes at issue are classified under item 700.56, TSUS, as footwear which is over 50 percent by weight of rubber or plastics or over 50 percent by weight of fibers and rubber or plastics with at least 10 percent by weight being rubber or plastics, other footwear having uppers of which over 90 percent of the exterior surface area is rubber or plastics (except footwear having foxing or a foxing-like band applied or molded at the sole and overlapping the upper), other. The rate of duty is 6 percent ad valorem.

The golf shoe, style 58149, that has a foxing-like band is classifiable under item 700.57, TSUS, which provides for footwear which is over 50 percent by weight of fibers and rubber or plastics with at least 10 percent by weight being rubber or plastics, other footwear, other, footwear designed to be worn over, or in lieu of, other footwear as a protection against water, oil, grease, or chemicals or cold or inclement weather. The rate of duty is 37.5 percent ad valorem. HRL 080791 and HRL 081792 are hereby revoked.

ISSUE 2

Under the HTSUSA, the merchandise at issue is classifiable under subheading 6402.19.90, which provides for other footwear with outer soles and uppers of rubber or plastics, sports footwear, other, other, valued over $12 per pair. The rate of duty is 20 percent ad valorem.

Sincerely,

John Durant, Director

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: