[ RFC Index | RFC Search | Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | Cities ]

    Search the Archives
Display RFC by number
    


RFC 2821: ... also didn't cover distinctions of autoreply-- so-that it...

<< Back to: RFC 2821

 
Reader comments:
 

Comment by Mr. Raymond Kenneth Petry
Submitted on 10/26/2004
Related RFC: RFC 2821
Rating: Not yet rated Rate this comment: Vote
... also didn't cover distinctions of autoreply-- so-that it doesn't redouble/rkp

 
 
FAQS.ORG makes no guarantees as to the accuracy of the posts. Each post is the personal opinion of the poster. These posts are not intended to substitute for medical, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. FAQS.ORG does not endorse any opinion or any product or service mentioned mentioned in these posts.

<< Back to: RFC 2821


© 2008 FAQS.ORG. All rights reserved.