[ Home  |  FAQ-Related Q&As  |  General Q&As  |  Answered Questions ]

    Search the Q&A Archives

why is japan not allowed to have a "standing" army? what...

<< Back to: [soc.history.war.world-war-ii] Frequently Asked Questions

Question by craigster
Submitted on 2/27/2004
Related FAQ: [soc.history.war.world-war-ii] Frequently Asked Questions
Rating: Rate this question: Vote
why is japan not allowed to have a "standing" army?  what will happen if japan is attacked by another country?  what nation, or nations, have an obligation, defend them?  Question submitted by an 8th. grade student for a history paper.


Answer by Greg
Submitted on 3/22/2004
Rating:  Rate this answer: Vote
because of japans harsh actions in world war II the United States have prevented them establishing another army. This is a try to prevent the horrific events that happened in world war II. There for the U.S. has commited to defend Japan in the case of an attack on them. Now the U.S. has befriended Japan in hope of a better future.

 

Answer by ho-bolly
Submitted on 2/15/2005
Rating: Not yet rated Rate this answer: Vote
your mom ate japan's army because she's so portly!

and allah's sake put some clothe on!

 

Answer by toto
Submitted on 4/19/2005
Rating: Not yet rated Rate this answer: Vote
i lov you and i need you nelly i love you i do

 

Answer by euthaniser
Submitted on 2/27/2007
Rating: Not yet rated Rate this answer: Vote
That is quite true.  However you described Japan's actions as "harsh" when they only killed a--in terms of modern warfare--handful of our people.  We however are the only country to have used nuclear weapons and thus your description of Japan as harsh seems hypocritical and not accurate as far as WWII history exists.  We killed an estimated 2 million people--mostly women and children--to prove our righteousness.  In retrospect, to call Japan harsh is simply a farce that is not even closely comparable to what we did.  If you want to educate--then tell the whole story.  Not just the side you feel is right.

 

Answer by euthaniser
Submitted on 2/27/2007
Rating: Not yet rated Rate this answer: Vote
That is quite true.  However you described Japan's actions as "harsh" when they only killed a--in terms of modern warfare--handful of our people.  We however are the only country to have used nuclear weapons and thus your description of Japan as harsh seems hypocritical and not accurate as far as WWII history exists.  We killed an estimated 2 million people--mostly women and children--to prove our righteousness.  In retrospect, to call Japan harsh is simply a farce that is not even closely comparable to what we did.  If you want to educate--then tell the whole story.  Not just the side you feel is right.

 

Answer by Jose Guerrero
Submitted on 3/5/2007
Rating: Not yet rated Rate this answer: Vote
Why do people's blood coagulate in the  lungs  

 

Your answer will be published for anyone to see and rate.  Your answer will not be displayed immediately.  If you'd like to get expert points and benefit from positive ratings, please create a new account or login into an existing account below.


Your name or nickname:
If you'd like to create a new account or access your existing account, put in your password here:
Your answer:

FAQS.ORG reserves the right to edit your answer as to improve its clarity.  By submitting your answer you authorize FAQS.ORG to publish your answer on the WWW without any restrictions. You agree to hold harmless and indemnify FAQS.ORG against any claims, costs, or damages resulting from publishing your answer.

 

FAQS.ORG makes no guarantees as to the accuracy of the posts. Each post is the personal opinion of the poster. These posts are not intended to substitute for medical, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. FAQS.ORG does not endorse any opinion or any product or service mentioned mentioned in these posts.

 

<< Back to: [soc.history.war.world-war-ii] Frequently Asked Questions

[ Home  |  FAQ-Related Q&As  |  General Q&As  |  Answered Questions ]
© 2008 FAQS.ORG. All rights reserved.