Top Document: FAQ: Air Traveler's Handbook 3/4 [Monthly posting] Previous Document: [3-3] Air Quality Next Document: [3-4a] Air Pressure Problems (Colds) See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge The December 1992 EPA report on the health effects of environmental tobacco smoke (so-called "second-hand smoke"), underscoring the independent assessments in 1986 by the US Surgeon General and the National Research Council, concluded that environmental tobacco smoke is a carcinogen with significant health risks for non-smokers. The lung cancer risks to non-smokers from environmental tobacco smoke are ten times greater than the cancer risks which would normally elicit a reaction from the EPA. It is therefore unthinkable that any airline would continue to condone smoking on any of its flights, and any airline that permits smoking is opening itself up to future lawsuits from non-smoking passengers and crew. Most domestic flights in the US are smoke-free, due to FAA regulations that restrict smoking on short flights (under 6 hours), including virtually all flights in the continental US. (Many flights to Hawaii are also smoke free, even though they last longer than 6 hours.) No US carrier operates completely smoke-free trans-oceanic service, with the exception of "experiments" (e.g., United on some SFO-SYD and JFK-LHR flights). As more passengers complain about smoking to the airlines, more flights will become smoke-free, especially new flights. Under US law, you are entitled to a non-smoking seat on a US carrier, even if it means shrinking the smoking section, provided you checked in on time. FAA rules prohibit smokers from smoking while standing. On flights that permit smoking, the smokers must be seated in the smoking section. Standing in the aisles while smoking is prohibited. This rule applies to all US carriers and to all commercial flights within the USA. Delta announced on August 24, 1994 that it will ban smoking on all 256 of its weekly trans-Atlantic flights starting January 1, 1995. A survey of Delta's trans-Atlantic passengers found that the airline would risk losing up to 7% of them due to the ban. The airline expects to more than make up the difference through new passengers attracted to the airline because of the smoke-free policy. The new policy will also apply to Delta flights within Europe and flights from JFK to Mexico. Delta decided on November 14 to extend the ban to trans-Pacific flights, making the carrier completely smoke-free. Smoking also will not be allowed in Delta's airport clubs. Delta code-share flights on other airlines may, however, continue to permit smoking. Thus Delta is the only US airline to be smoke-free on all its domestic and international routes. Northwest Airlines has banned smoking in all US domestic flights since 1988, and in first-class cabins worldwide since January 1994. Northwest will ban smoking on its non-stop flights from Seattle to Hong Kong starting November 1994. American Airlines has banned smoking on some, but not all flights from New York and Chicago to London, as of October 1, 1994. When United announced that international flights to London (from New York) and the South Pacific (LA-Auckland) will be smoke-free, they got such favorable response that they're now testing smoke-free service on some, but not all, of the flights between London and San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Washington (Dulles). As of October 30, 1994, United flights from San Francisco to Sydney and Hong Kong are also smoke free. Note that code-share flights operated by another airline may permit smoking even when they carry a flight number of a smoke-free airline. Air Canada, Air New Zealand, Canadian Airlines, Cathay Pacific, and China Airlines all participate in code-shares with smoking carriers on some routes. The smoke status of other international carriers is as follows: Air Canada: Flights between Canada and the USA and Europe are all non-smoking. Air France: Non-smoking because of a change in French law. Air New Zealand: All flights to the USA and within New Zealand. All flights to/from Australia and most flights within the South Pacific. Smoking is permitted on pool flights operated by Qantas, of which there are many. Asiana: OZ is smoke-free on all its worldwide routes. OZ flies between SEL and HNL, JFK, SFO, and LAX, with onward connections from SEL to Japan, China, and Southeast Asia. OZ now has the only direct smoke-free flights to Asia from New York and Honolulu, and offers the best option for smoke-free travel from anywhere in the U.S. to Japan (same-airport connections in SEL are much simpler than airport changes in Tokyo or Osaka for flights to other japanese cities) and China. OZ may raise prices as it gets better known, but for now the service is great value for the price. British Airways: Riding the fence; no firm policies as yet. There is a completely non-smoking SFO-LHR nonstop. Complete smoking ban on all flights to Australia and New Zealand. Many European flights are non-smoking (71% of domestic flights, 22% of international flights). No smoking on flights within Europe of duration less than 1.5 hours. Canadian Airlines It'l: All flights to Euope, TPE, HKG, and BKK, and pool flights YVR-HNL-AKL operated by either Canadian Airlines International or Air New Zealand. Smoking is permitted on the YVR-FRA flight, and pressure from Japan forced smoking on flights to Japan (TYO and NGO). (The US seems to export lawyers and tobacco to Japan. :-) Cathay Pacific: Daily nonstop LAX-HKG is smoke-free as is all flights within Asia, and to Australia and New Zealand. New non-smoking flights between FRA and HKG. Smoking is allowed on flights to Europe, the Mideast, and Africa. Cathay Pacific has announced its intention to become a totally smoke-free airline, on all its routes worldwide, by the end of 1995. China Airlines: SFO-TPE and all flights within Asia. Three weekly smoke-free nonstop flights LAX-TPE; smoking is permited on the daily afternoon departure from LAX to TPE, as well as all flights to HNL, NYC, and ANC. They also permit smoking on flights to Europe and Africa. Most inter-Asia and many trans-Pacific flights are smoke-free. Most CRS don't indicate which China Airlines flights are smoke-free, so call the airline to check specific flights. Domestic flights within China (CAAC) are smoke-free. Qantas: Riding the fence; no firm policies as yet. Smoking is banned on some flights to the South Pacific. Singapore Airlines: All SQ flights from SFO and LAX (SFO-HKG-SIN, LAX-TPE-SIN, and LAX-NRT-SIN) are smoke-free since 1-JUL-94. All flights to Europe and North America will be smoke-free as of 30-OCT-94. Only flights originating or terminating in Japan will permit smoking. (Singapore has banned tobacco advertisements since 1970 and does not sell duty-free cigarettes in the airport. Smoking is prohibited in all public buildings and government offices, buses, subways, and taxis.) Virgin Atlantic: All flights worldwide except flights to Tokyo will be smoke-free as of May 1, 1995. KLM-Royal Dutch Airlines, Lufthansa, and Scandinavian Airlines Systems (SAS) have reinstated smoking sections on some international flights after trial bans. The stated reasons were economic. The US House of Representatives Public Works and Transportation aviation subcommittee voted on 31-AUG-94 to ban smoking on all international flights that begin or end in the US. Only the US leg of a multipart flight would be affected. All airlines would be affected, including foreign airlines. Airline flight attendants who work international routes are strongly supporting the measure. The bill passed the full House on 5-OCT-94, and is now under consideration by the Senate. The International Civil Aviation Organization has urged all carriers to ban smoking by July 1, 1996. Toward that goal, the Unites States, Canada, and Australia signed an agreement on 1-NOV-94 banning smoking on all commercial flights between their countries. Only applies to flights operated by US, Canadian, and Australian airlines, and takes effect in 120 days. The New York Times reported on 13-DEC-94 that a Miami judge has ruled that airline flight attendants can sue tobacco companies for smoking-related problems caused by environmental tobacco smoke. This is the first class-action suit concerned with second-hand smoke. The suit is seeking over $1 billion in damages on behalf of the up to 60,000 current and former flight attendants affected by environmental tobacco smoke. If you have a condition which is affected by smoke, such as asthma, allergy to tobacco smoke, etc., be sure to mention this to a flight attendant, especially if you wind up "by accident" in the smoking section. User Contributions:Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic:Top Document: FAQ: Air Traveler's Handbook 3/4 [Monthly posting] Previous Document: [3-3] Air Quality Next Document: [3-4a] Air Pressure Problems (Colds) Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Single Page [ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ] Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer: mkant@cs.cmu.edu
Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:12 PM
|
Throughout time, we can see how we have been slowly conditioned to come to this point where we are on the verge of a cashless society. Did you know that the Bible foretold of this event almost 2,000 years ago?
In Revelation 13:16-18, we will read,
"He (the false prophet who deceives many by his miracles--Revelation 19:20) causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man: His number is 666."
Speaking to the last generation, this could only be speaking of a cashless society. Why's that? Revelation 13:17 says that we cannot buy or sell unless we receive the mark of the beast. If physical money was still in use, we could buy or sell with one another without receiving the mark. This would contradict scripture that states we need the mark to buy or sell!
These verses could not be referring to something purely spiritual as scripture references two physical locations (our right hand or forehead) stating the mark will be on one "OR" the other. If this mark was purely spiritual, it would indicate both places, or one--not one OR the other!
This is where it really starts to come together. It is incredible how accurate the Bible is concerning the implantable RFID microchip. This is information from a man named Carl Sanders who worked with a team of engineers to help develop this RFID chip:
"Carl Sanders sat in seventeen New World Order meetings with heads-of-state officials such as Henry Kissinger and Bob Gates of the C.I.A. to discuss plans on how to bring about this one-world system. The government commissioned Carl Sanders to design a microchip for identifying and controlling the peoples of the world—a microchip that could be inserted under the skin with a hypodermic needle (a quick, convenient method that would be gradually accepted by society).
Carl Sanders, with a team of engineers behind him, with U.S. grant monies supplied by tax dollars, took on this project and designed a microchip that is powered by a lithium battery, rechargeable through the temperature changes in our skin. Without the knowledge of the Bible (Brother Sanders was not a Christian at the time), these engineers spent one-and-a-half-million dollars doing research on the best and most convenient place to have the microchip inserted.
Guess what? These researchers found that the forehead and the back of the hand (the two places the Bible says the mark will go) are not just the most convenient places, but are also the only viable places for rapid, consistent temperature changes in the skin to recharge the lithium battery. The microchip is approximately seven millimeters in length, .75 millimeters in diameter, about the size of a grain of rice. It is capable of storing pages upon pages of information about you. All your general history, work history, criminal record, health history, and financial data can be stored on this chip.
Brother Sanders believes that this microchip, which he regretfully helped design, is the “mark” spoken about in Revelation 13:16–18. The original Greek word for “mark” is “charagma,” which means a “scratch or etching.” It is also interesting to note that the number 666 is actually a word in the original Greek. The word is “chi xi stigma,” with the last part, “stigma,” also meaning “to stick or prick.” Carl believes this is referring to a hypodermic needle when they poke into the skin to inject the microchip."
Mr. Sanders asked a doctor what would happen if the lithium contained within the RFID microchip leaked into the body. The doctor replied by saying a (...)