|
Archive-name: magick/kreeeping-ooze/part03
Posting-Frequency: to alt.magick -- by inquiry and desire; to news.answers -- approximately monthly ___________________________________________________________________________ See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge nathan.huff@aquila.com (Nathan Huff) writes: |is there an Internet address I can send to for imfo on Magick |I'm just now learning And would like all the help I could get ____________________________________________________________________________ Revised 9503 KREEPING OOze FAQ Question #3: "How do I get started in magick?" ------------ [Books] Ceci writes: Books are one answer. There are actually books which try to take you from your first tentative attempts at relaxation into holding a ritual. Israel Regardie's _One-Year Manual_ comes to mind. I've read it and tried it, but it didn't work very well for me. Maybe it will for you. Other than that, it's a matter of Reebok rhetoric: Just do it! If you like to, you can see this as one of the very first exercises in Will; you Will yourself into making a ritual. And just as with sex, the first time you'll feel pathetic, clumsy and silly, but if you keep on learning, you'll improve. And of course, make sure that you won't be interrupted, and practice "safe magick". If you found a ritual in a book that you feel comfortable with, try it. But at least try to think of something personal. Try to visualize yourself doing it, daydream about it, and if it still feels ok, carry it out physically. Start out small. Learn to crawl before you go for the marathon. Don't talk about it with people who won't understand what it means to you. The fourth power (of the Sphinx) is there for a reason. Ceci, playing the Crone ceci@lysator.liu.se __________________________________________________________________ [Tarot] I would suggest that you start with The Book of Thoth by Aleister Crowley, his magnum opus on tarot. If that don't tweak ya, or if it's too confusing to start I would suggest finding your local OTO body (just email to Bill Heidrick if you don't know where the closest one might be) of if that's not your style try your local Wiccan group, they are usually good at helping out beginners with the basics. skhtmt@teleport.com (Fra. Doubt-Goat) ------------------------------------- Read this newsgroup for a few months and begin following up on connections to things that strike you as interesting. Visit your local bookstore and look for some of the books that are being mentioned. Read them and ask questions. Begin a magical diary and invent a short daily meditation session. Record your experiences. Try to remember and record your dreams. Resist the temptation to believe what anyone else tells you. Try to invent ways to find out things for yourself. Remain skeptical. Look for ways in which you have may have been doing magick without realizing it. Think about what it might mean if you could use it with intention, and how you might go about that. robin@winternet.com (one star in sight) --------------------------------------- [Assistance] Questions like this often come up in rec.climbing. All kinds of people are getting started in rock climbing, and as you'd imagine some of them get themselves into trouble because they don't know what they're doing. My experience has been that people don't want unsolicited advice. I've come to expect dirty looks when I point out to climbers that they've set up their equipment wrong. I haven't stopped telling people this, but I have learned to be tactful and not to get upset when they react negatively. My climbing friends and I pretty much agree that we are not strictly obligated to warn others when they are in danger, but we often choose to do so. Each instance requires a judgment call--how dangerous is the practice, will we actually help by saying anything, is it an area where we have enough experience to be sure of what we're saying, etc. I would ask myself the same questions before warning anyone.... tea@netcom.com (Tom Ace) ------------------------ [Magical Systems] johnm@utic (Jonathan Montoya) writes: |...all these systems, can they produce the same results, are some |better than others? Are systems strict, if you don't do something one |way then things won't turn out the way you expected? Most results are obtainable within many different systems. Some results are more readily obtainable within some systems. The question "better" presumes a system of values. Likely candidates for such values are: approachability efficacy potency consistancy with personal philosophies directness robustness beneficial/harmfull side effects For any combination of these values, and for any given individual, there are almost certainly better and worse systems. Other individuals with other values would likely make very different assessments. What you get out of any magickal process depends on what you put into it. There are many different ways to obtain a particular result, but small differences in what you do can make a big difference in what you get. |Is it possible to adapt a system, or even make-up your own, that is still |effective? Yes, but you might be better off studying some well evolved systems and learning from them before you create your own. On the other hand, if you have clear notions of what magick is all about, it might be better for you to pursue your inner course and avoid outside contamination. |Do you have to have a religious belief in that system? No ... but if you have strong religious beliefs it might be better to select a system that is compatible with them. But then on the other hand, it might be better to select a system that is completely incompatible with them. It depends on what your goals are. markk@cypress.West.Sun.COM (Mark Kampe) --------------------------------------- [Exercises] Pick up a copy of A Crowley's Magick in Theory and Practice. Read it. Pick up a copy of RA Wilson's Prometheus Rising. Read it. Do the exercises. Do NOT take anything seriously all the time. Be very careful of picking up any "right dogma", avoid this entirely, if possible. Listen to people, but ALWAYS think for yourself and develope your own outlook. NEVER subsume you opinion/will in others. Take an ACTIVE role in experimentation, avoid people who say they know the "one true" way pf doing anything! Good luck! parubi@io.com (parubi) ---------------------- [General] Information See the _MaGI's Guide to the Internet_. There's a nexus which will allow you to scout out your own torrent of information overload: elists with which to pelt your ebox, ftp sites to swim in until you overload your memory-quota, and Usenet groups to overload your newsreader. The problem is not access to information any more (at least not once one has oriented and this doesn't take much time), it is sorting that in which we can find value from that in which we cannot. [ftp.portal.com/pub/ss/OMNet/magi] Authority A great part of the problem is that what's 'authoritative' is somewhat relative to the individual who is doing the review. There are emotional and imaginative approaches, dry and intellectual affairs, those based on not much experience, those based entirely on it, those who prefer their magick in armchairs, those who prefer it in Hell, in Heaven, in Space, in the Dirt, some with connections to organizations (covens, lodges, grottos, pronaos, churches, temples, etc.), some to traditions (lineages, sects, etc.) and some way out there in weirdsville-whoknowswhere. Thoughts The first step in determining 'authoritativeness' is to look INWARD. What sorts of questions do you find valuable to contemplate? Are they pragmatic (how do I do X?), theoretical (what does X mean?), ethical (when is it bad to do X?), or some combination of these? If YOU were devising a test for aspirants (don't bother that you may be one yourself), what questions would you put on this test (don't worry if you don't know answers!)? Making up the test will assist you in beginning a comparison of knowledge-bases with others in the occult community online or off. Continue to look at these questions. Watch how your responses change as you meet people who approach the questions from different places. Add to that list of questions and restructure them as you proceed in your self-education. Tastes The second step in determining 'authoritativeness' is to look INWARD. What are your TASTES with regard to magical and occult subjects and practices? If you don't know, then EXPLORE! Find out what tastes good. Do angels and bunnies and light just turn you on? How about Alien Infestations from the Horrid Depths of Space? Strange words and weird mathematics? Just swimming in cool ponds during autumn? There are many many different approaches to magick, even religious ones! (see Islam/Sufism or the recent 'Christian Magick Elist' called 'FiatLVX'). Explore as many as suits your taste. Sometimes settling for what comes first is not the best means of attaining any goals you may have. Activity The third step in determining 'authoritativeness' is to EXPERIENCE. Do things. Try out things and above all, FAIL MISERABLY. The failure is as important as is the success. The two are ultimately a product of warped thinking anyway. *Do things*, as the alt.magick.chaos people love to say. Socrates said that the unexamined life is not worth living. It may be equally true that the UNEXPERIENCED life is not worth living. Be imaginative. Fly by the seat of your pants. Take risks. Do the FORBIDDEN. Tempt josh. Reflection The fourth step in determining 'authoritativeness' is to REFLECT. See what people say in their words/actions/expressions which seems to conform to your experience of the world. When you can get a 'fix' on someone and you LIKE what they are saying, then compare these people with others who may qualify in a similar way. Engage others and draw from THEIR experience and reflection. Develop your own ideas as a result of critical thought ('Question Authority, dammit!) and your own practice as a result of creative exploration ('Do something, dammit!). Abstraction The last step in determining 'authoritativeness' is to PROJECT. Just because someone says something about which you do not agree this does not make them idiots. They may have experience which you do not have and they could be representing a very important and oft-overlooked reflection. It is for this reason that it is quite difficult to be sure just who is and who is not an asshole without substance. Along the path of wizardry we do not burn our bridges, even while we may place small signs near them which say 'Of Uncertain Value'. Growth The most important principle in determining 'authoritativeness' is to develop it within ourselves. Suckling at the teats of masters may be important at certain stages of our growth, yet eventually we must break away from the nest, we must try out our wings, we must take risks and become reservoirs of experience and wisdom ourselves. If nothing else, through such exploits we may become humble. nagasiva, tyagi@houseofkaos.abyss.com ------------------------------------- t93cle@albireo.tdb.uu.se (Christoffer Lernoe) |>| My problem is that I can't seem to find any magick that fully appeals |>| to me. Almost everywhere the advice to "choose the approach that suits |>| you best" pops up, but what to do when I can't find one I like? unknown |>Make it up as you go along. Create your own style. This is how the |>current paths appeared. Keep making it up, revising as you learn more |>and more. t93cle@albireo.tdb.uu.se (Christoffer Lernoe) |The difficulty is (to me) how to approach this new path. I've seen |exclusively visualization techniques used, what is the alternative? Oh come on, get imaginative. Explore the length and breadth of religious and magical disciplines and techniques. Visualization? It is quite effective for those who don't have a need or resource for material tools. Look at all the divination systems available: astrology, qabalah, tarot, runes, etc., etc. Look at the spiritualist supply stores: ouija, rapping tables, esp cards, etc., etc. Look at the ceremonialist's shoppes: wands, swords, incenses, candles, cauldrons, etc., etc. Look at the fetishist supply stores: dildos, floggers, clamps, needles, razors, etc. etc. Look at the primitive and modern religious practices: drums, rattles, bells, lights, chanting, spinning, singing, etc., etc. Check into the resources on 'natural highs' and 'psychotropics'. Check into the billions of ways to become a sorceror (one who explores the realms of consciousness). Magick may find its way to you. |What is you opinion Tyagi? Are these the limits of magick? Limits? No way! There is no limit to magick. It can infuse and encompass your entire life experience. You can click into the Wave of the World and become the Great Fool-Magus that attains to the Great Work and sets the world arights. Refashion the Cosmos to your liking, become God, do the Hokey Pokey! tyagi the dilettante tyagi@houseofkaos.abyss.com --------------------------- [Warning] This is a note to those who are young (male or female) and are interested in learning more about the magickal arts. Take heed of those who say that they can teach you all about what is magickal. Especially if you must join their "coven" or group to do so. There is nothing you can learn from them that you can't from a book. I also feel that everyone should have a grasp of the basics before joining a working group. If you don't know where to go or what to start with, just ask for a good reference. Don't fall for the "I hold the secret knowledge" line. Because that's all it is... a line. I've seen too many people bite a line like that and end up getting screwed (in more ways than one) and than told that they still aren't ready for the next grade. "I hold the key to my own self knowing." Lilith Darkchilde <lilith@slip-1.slip.net> ------------------------------------------ Magick Booklist now a separate file. Find it at: ftp.portal.com/pub/ss/Usenet/FAQs/KR2.mgckbks.9412 ========================================================================== This document is Copyright (c) 1994, authors cited. All rights reserved. Permission to distribute the collection is hereby granted providing that distribution is electronic, no money is involved, reasonable attempts are made to use the latest version and all credits and this copyright notice are maintained. Other requests for distribution should be directed to the individual authors of the particular articles. _________________________________________________________________________ This is from a series of continually-updated posts responding to recurrent questions in this newsgroup. Please debate anything in here which seems extreme and add your own response to these questions after the post. I'll integrate what I like. Thanks. tyagi nagasiva tyagI@houseofkaos.Abyss.coM (I@AM) User Contributions: |
Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic: