Top Document: soc.culture.jewish.parenting FAQ: Newsgroup Policies and Procedures Previous Document: 3.1. How are moderators chosen? Next Document: 3.3. What happens when a moderator or advisor resigns? See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge There is internal monitoring done between the moderators of rejected postings, as well as participation in the newsgroup to observe accepted postings. When the group identifies a problem, we work with the moderator in question to address the issue. If the problem remains, a vote is conducted among the entire advisory board with respect to removing the individual from moderation capacity. If two-thirds* (66%) of the advisory board votes to remove the moderator, the moderator is removed, and a new moderator selected using the procedures in 3.3 (however, the removed moderator does not have veto rights in the selection of a new moderator). *: This is a working percentage, the actual percentage, which will be greater than 50%, is still being determined through interaction with the service that provides the moderation randomizer. User Contributions:Top Document: soc.culture.jewish.parenting FAQ: Newsgroup Policies and Procedures Previous Document: 3.1. How are moderators chosen? Next Document: 3.3. What happens when a moderator or advisor resigns? Single Page [ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ] Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer: SCJ FAQ Maintainer <maintainer@scjfaq.org>
Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:11 PM
|
Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic: