Top Document: [sci.astro] Stars (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (7/9) Previous Document: G.00 Stars Next Document: G.01.2 What are all those different kinds of stars? White Dwarfs How are white dwarfs classified? What See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge Author: Steve Willner <swillner@cfa.harvard.edu>, Ken Croswell There are lots of different ways to classify stars. The most important single property of a star is its mass, but alas, stellar masses for most stars are very hard to measure directly. Instead stars are classified by things that are easier to measure, even though they are less fundamental. There are three separate classification criteria commonly used: surface temperature, surface gravity, and heavy element abundance. The familiar "spectral sequence" OBAFGKM is a _temperature_ sequence from the hottest to the coolest stars. Strictly speaking, the letters describe the appearance of a star's spectrum, but because most stars are made out of the same stuff, temperature has the biggest effect on the spectrum. O stars are hotter than 30000 K and show ionized helium in their spectra. M stars are cooler than 4000 K and show molecular bands of TiO. Others are in between. The ordinary spectral classes are divided into subclasses denoted by numbers; thus G5 is a medium temperature star a little cooler than G2. The Sun is generally considered a G2 star. Not all the subclasses are used, or at least generally accepted; G3 and G4 are absent, for example. For historical reasons, hotter stars are said to have "earlier" spectral types, and cool stars to have "later" spectral types. An "early A" star might mean somewhere between A0 and A3, while "late A" might denote roughly A5--A8. Or "early type stars" might mean everything from O through A or F. There's nothing terribly wrong with this bit of jargon, but it can be confusing if you haven't seen it before. There are several spectral types that don't fit the scheme above. One reason is abnormal composition. For example, some stars are cool enough for molecules to form in their atmospheres. The most stable molecule at high temperatures is carbon monoxide. In most stars, oxygen is more abundant than carbon, and if the star is cool enough to form molecules, virtually all the carbon combines with oxygen. Leftover oxygen can form molecules like titanium oxide and vanadium oxide (neither of which is particularly abundant but both of which have prominent spectral bands at visible wavelengths), but no carbon-containing molecules other than CO can form. (This is only approximately true. Weak CN lines can often be seen, for example, and all kinds of stuff will show up if you look hard enough. This article just gives a summary of the big picture.) In a minority of stars, however, the situation is reversed, and there is no (or rather very little) oxygen to form molecules other than CO. These stars show lines of CH, CC, and CN, and they are called (not surprisingly!) "carbon stars." They are nowadays given spectral classifications of C(x,y) where x is a temperature index and y is related to heavy element abundance and surface gravity. These stars were formerly given "R" and "N" spectral types, and you occasionally still see those used. Roughly speaking, R stars have temperatures in the same range as K stars and N stars in the same range as M, though the correspondence is far from exact. Another interesting group is the S stars. In these, the atmospheric carbon and oxygen abundances are nearly equal, and neither C nor O (or at least not much of either) is available to form other molecules. These stars show zirconium oxide and unusual metal lines such as barium. There are other stars with unusual abundances: CH, CN, SC, and probably more. They are rare. There are also stars that are peculiar in one way or another and have spectral types followed by "p." The "Ap" stars are one popular class. And finally, some stars have extended atmospheres and show emission lines instead of the normal absorption lines. These get an "e" or "f." The second major classification is by surface gravity, which is proportional to the stellar mass divided by radius squared. This is useful because spectra can measure the gas pressure in the part of the atmosphere where the spectral lines are formed; this pressure depends closely on surface gravity. But because surface gravity is related to stellar radius, it is also related to the stellar luminosity. Every unit of stellar surface area emits an amount of radiation that mostly depends on the temperature, and for a given temperature the total luminosity thus depends on surface area which is proportional to radius squared hence inversely proportional to surface gravity. The upshot of all this is that we have "dwarf" stars of relatively high surface gravity, small radius, and low luminosity, and "giant" stars of low surface gravity, large radius, and high luminosity _and their spectra look different_. In fact, many "luminosity classes" are identified in spectra. For normal stars, these are designated by Roman numerals and lower case letters following the spectral class in the order: Ia+, Ia, Iab, Ib, II, III, IV, V. Class I stars are also called "supergiants," class II "bright giants," class III "giants," class IV "subgiants," and class V either "dwarfs" or more commonly "main sequence stars." By the way, not all luminosity classes exist for every spectral type. The importance of all this is that the luminosity classes are closely related to the evolution of the stars. Stars spend most of their lives burning hydrogen in their cores. For stars in this evolutionary stage, the surface temperature and radius, hence spectral type and luminosity class, are determined by stellar mass. If we draw a diagram of temperature or spectral type on one axis and luminosity class on the other and plot each star as a point in the correct position, we find nearly all stars fall very close to a single line; this line is called the "main sequence." (This kind of diagram is called a "Hertzsprung-Russell" or "H-R" diagram after two astronomers who were among the first to use it.) Stars at the low mass end of the main sequence are very cool (spectral type M) and are called "red dwarfs." This term is not very precise and may include K-type stars as well. As stars age, they expand and cool off; stars in this stage of evolution account for the brighter luminosity classes mentioned above. If they happen to be cool, they are called "red giants" or perhaps "red supergiants." One interesting special case is for the hottest stars, spectral classes O and early B. Normally main sequence stars are hotter if they have more mass, but not once they reach such high temperatures. Instead more massive stars have larger radii but about the same surface temperature, so an O I star is likely more massive but no more evolved than an O V star. These stars are called "blue giants" or "blue supergiants." After stars finally burn out their nuclear fuel, any of several thing can happen, depending mainly on their initial mass and perhaps on whether they had a nearby companion. Some stars explode and are entirely destroyed, but most leave remnants: white dwarfs, neutron stars, or black holes. White dwarfs have high density because they are supported by "electron degeneracy pressure." This is a kind of pressure that arises from the Fermi exclusion principle in nuclear physics. A white dwarf has roughly the radius of the Earth but a mass close to that of the Sun. No white dwarf can have a mass greater than the "Chandrasekhar limit," about 1.4 solar masses. White dwarfs are given spectral type designations DA, DB, and DC according to the spectral lines seen. These lines represent the composition of just a thin layer on the star's surface, so the spectral classifications aren't terribly fundamental. White dwarfs radiate solely by virtue of their stored heat. As they radiate, they cool off, eventually turning into "black dwarfs." Because their radii are so small, though, white dwarfs take billions of years to cool. There may be few or no black dwarfs in our galaxy simply there has not been time for many white dwarfs to cool off. Of course it's not obvious how one would detect black dwarfs if they exist. Neutron stars are even more compact; the mass of the Sun in a radius of order only 10 km. These stars are supported by "neutron degeneracy pressure," in which Fermi exclusion acts on neutrons. Neutron stars have a maximum mass of around 2 solar masses, although the exact theoretical value depends on properties of the neutron that are not known terribly accurately. Because the radius is so small, these stars don't emit significant visible light from their surfaces. They may emit radio energy as pulsars. Some properties of black holes are discussed elsewhere in the FAQ. All types of "compact remnants," white dwarfs, neutron stars, and black holes, may emit energy from an accretion disk around them if a nearby companion is transferring mass to the compact remnant. The emission often comes out at X-ray and ultraviolet wavelengths. The third classification is by composition and specifically by "heavy element abundance." In astronomy, "heavy elements" or "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium. Since heavy elements are created in stars, stars formed later in the life of the galaxy have more heavy elements than found in older stars. The term "subdwarf" or occasionally "luminosity class VI" refers to stars of low metallicity. Because they have so few metals, they look a little hotter than they "ought" to be for their masses or equivalently have lower luminosity than main sequence stars of the same color. Physically, these stars are burning hydrogen in their cores and are similar to main sequence stars except for the lower metallicities. Since all these stars are old, they are of low luminosity. Their higher luminosity counterparts no doubt existed but have long since evolved away, most of them presumably into some form of compact remnant. The following material is adapted from Ken Croswell's book The Alchemy of the Heavens (Doubleday/Anchor, 1995) and is reprinted here with permission of the author. The terms "Population I" and "Population II" originated with Baade, who in 1943 divided stars into these two broad groups. Today, we know the Galaxy is considerably more complicated, and we recognize four different stellar populations. To make a long story short, the modern populations are: THIN DISK metal-rich, various ages THICK DISK old and somewhat metal-poor STELLAR HALO old and very metal-poor; home of the subdwarfs BULGE old and metal-rich To make a long story longer: as astronomers presently understand the Milky Way, every star falls into one of these four different stellar populations. The brightest is the thin-disk population, to which the Sun and 96 percent of its neighbors belong. Sirius, Vega, Rigel, Betelgeuse, and Alpha Centauri are all members. Stars in the thin disk come in a wide variety of ages, from newborn objects to stars that are 10 billion years old. As its name implies, the thin-disk population clings to the Galactic plane, with a typical member lying within a thousand light-years of it. Kinematically, the stars revolve around the Galaxy fast, having fairly circular orbits and small U, V, W velocities. (These are the intrinsic space velocities with respect to the average of nearby stars. Zero in all components means rotating around the center of the Galaxy at something like 220 km/s but no other motion.) Thin-disk stars are also metal-rich, like the Sun. The second stellar population in the Galaxy is called the thick disk. It accounts for about 4 percent of all stars near the Sun. Arcturus is a likely member. The thick disk is old and forms a more distended system around the Galactic plane, with a typical star lying several thousand light-years above or below it. The stars have more elliptical orbits, higher U, V, W velocities, and metallicities around 25 percent of the Sun's. The third stellar population is known as the halo. Halo stars are old and rare, accounting for only 0.1 to 0.2 percent of the stars near the Sun. Kapteyn's Star is the closest halo star to Earth. These stars make up a somewhat spherical system, so most members of the halo lie far above or far below the Galactic plane. Kinematically, halo stars as a group show little if any net rotation around the Galaxy, and a typical member therefore has a very negative V velocity. (This is a reflection of the Sun's motion around the Galactic center in the +V direction.) The halo stars often have extremely elliptical orbits; some of them may lie 100,000 light-years from the Galactic center at apogalacticon but venture within a few thousand at perigalacticon. Metallicities are even lower than in the thick disk, usually between 1 and 10 percent of the Sun's. Subdwarfs are members of this population. The fourth and final stellar population is the bulge, which lies at the center of the Galaxy. Other galaxies have bulges too; some can be seen in edge-on spiral galaxies as the bump that extends above and below the galaxy's plane at the center. The Galactic bulge is old and metal-rich. Most of its stars lie within a few thousand light-years of the Galactic center, so few if any exist near the Sun. Consequently, the bulge is the least explored stellar population in the Milky Way. References: Ken Croswell, _The Alchemy of the Heavens_ (Doubleday/Anchor, 1995) (See http://www.ccnet.com/~galaxy) James B. Kaler, _Stars and their Spectra: an Introduction to the Spectral Sequence (Cambridge U. Press, 1989) Most any introductory astronomy book. User Contributions:Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic:Top Document: [sci.astro] Stars (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (7/9) Previous Document: G.00 Stars Next Document: G.01.2 What are all those different kinds of stars? White Dwarfs How are white dwarfs classified? What Part0 - Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Part6 - Part7 - Part8 - Single Page [ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ] Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer: jlazio@patriot.net
Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:11 PM
|
with stars, then every direction you looked would eventually end on
the surface of a star, and the whole sky would be as bright as the
surface of the Sun.
Why would anyone assume this? Certainly, we have directions where we look that are dark because something that does not emit light (is not a star) is between us and the light. A close example is in our own solar system. When we look at the Sun (a star) during a solar eclipse the Moon blocks the light. When we look at the inner planets of our solar system (Mercury and Venus) as they pass between us and the Sun, do we not get the same effect, i.e. in the direction of the planet we see no light from the Sun? Those planets simply look like dark spots on the Sun.
Olbers' paradox seems to assume that only stars exist in the universe, but what about the planets? Aren't there more planets than stars, thus more obstructions to light than sources of light?
What may be more interesting is why can we see certain stars seemingly continuously. Are there no planets or other obstructions between them and us? Or is the twinkle in stars just caused by the movement of obstructions across the path of light between the stars and us? I was always told the twinkle defines a star while the steady light reflected by our planets defines a planet. Is that because the planets of our solar system don't have the obstructions between Earth and them to cause a twinkle effect?
9-14-2024 KP