|
Top Document: [sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Resources (Frequently Asked Previous Document: The Internet and other information sources Next Document: A.02 How do I subscribe to *sci.astro**? See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge (I've answered this question offline enough times that I thought it would be worthwhile to include it here. The FAQ is distributed widely enough that people may happen upon it through non-Usenet channels.) In order to access *sci.astro*, you need an internet service provider (ISP). This could be a large commercial provider, like AOL or Prodigy in the U.S., or a more local one (check your phonebook under "Computer Networks" or "Internet"). If you're enrolled at a college or university in the U.S. (or overseas?), talk to your computer center; many colleges and universities are now providing free Internet access to students. If you don't have an ISP, you'll have to choose one. If you're interested in reading the *sci.astro* groups, as you search for an ISP, you'll want to ask the various contenders if they provide access to Usenet and specifically to the sci. hierarchy. If they don't, or can't tell you, that's a bad sign. If you already have an ISP, you'll have to read their documentation or talk to their tech help. Some ISPs provide Usenet access through a Web browser (like Mosaic, Netscape, or Internet Explorer), others provide access through a dedicated news reading program like tin, rn, or GNUS. There are many different possibilities. User Contributions:Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic:Top Document: [sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Resources (Frequently Asked Previous Document: The Internet and other information sources Next Document: A.02 How do I subscribe to *sci.astro**? Part0 - Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Part6 - Part7 - Part8 - Single Page [ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ] Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer: T. Joseph W. Lazio <jlazio@patriot.net>
Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:11 PM
|
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Resources (Frequently Asked
Section - A.02 How do I subscribe to *sci.astro**?
Search the FAQ Archives
N - O - P - Q - R - S - T - U - V - W - X - Y - Z
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Resources (Frequently Asked
Section - A.02 How do I subscribe to *sci.astro**?
( Part0 - Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Part6 - Part7 - Part8 - Single Page
)
[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index | Neighborhoods ]
with stars, then every direction you looked would eventually end on
the surface of a star, and the whole sky would be as bright as the
surface of the Sun.
Why would anyone assume this? Certainly, we have directions where we look that are dark because something that does not emit light (is not a star) is between us and the light. A close example is in our own solar system. When we look at the Sun (a star) during a solar eclipse the Moon blocks the light. When we look at the inner planets of our solar system (Mercury and Venus) as they pass between us and the Sun, do we not get the same effect, i.e. in the direction of the planet we see no light from the Sun? Those planets simply look like dark spots on the Sun.
Olbers' paradox seems to assume that only stars exist in the universe, but what about the planets? Aren't there more planets than stars, thus more obstructions to light than sources of light?
What may be more interesting is why can we see certain stars seemingly continuously. Are there no planets or other obstructions between them and us? Or is the twinkle in stars just caused by the movement of obstructions across the path of light between the stars and us? I was always told the twinkle defines a star while the steady light reflected by our planets defines a planet. Is that because the planets of our solar system don't have the obstructions between Earth and them to cause a twinkle effect?
9-14-2024 KP