Top Document: comp.cad.autocad AutoLISP FAQ (part 1/2) - general Previous Document: [1] Where can I find AutoLISP routines on the Internet? Next Document: [3] How do I debug AutoLISP programs? See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge AutoLISP to Visual LISP Kevin Standiford, Autodesk Press, ISBN 0-7668-1517 AutoLISP: Programming for Productivity, William Kramer, Autodesk Press, ISBN 0-8273-5832-6 Essential AutoLISP, Roy Harkow, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 0-387-94571-7 AutoLISP in Plain English, A Practical Guide for Non-Programmers, George O. Head, Ventana Press, ISBN 1-566-04140-6 AutoLISP Reference Manual Autodesk Press. Up to R12 there was a separate AutoLISP Reference book. Then AutoLISP became a part of the Customization Guide for R13. From R14 on this guide is compiled as Winhelp. Maximizing AutoLISP Rusty Gesner, Tony and Mark Middlebrook, Tony Tanzillo. A new Maximizing AutoLISP R13/R14 will be published hopefully sooner or later. But the R12 book is still worth buying, though it's difficult to find. More at http://www.group-a.com/~rusty There is a lot more AutoLISP books around. Recommended general LISP books (not AutoLISP!) are: ANSI Common Lisp, (Common Lisp primer) Paul Graham, Prentice Hall, ISBN 0-13-370875-6 Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs, (high-level Scheme) H.Abelson, GJ. Sussman, J. Sussman, MIT Press, ISBN 0-262-01153-0 "This undoubtedly one of the best general computer books ever written." LISP, 3rd Edition, Patrick Henry Winston and Berthold Klaus Paul Horn, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, ISBN 0-201-08319-1 Looking at LISP, Tony Hasemer, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, ISBN 0-201-12080-1 [2.1] Online AutoLISP documents, Winhelp [deleted] [2.2] AutoLISP Coding Style Most of the samples being published by magazines or at various websites are written badly making the AutoLISP learning process even harder for newbies. LISP is hard to read anyway because of it's briefness and countless parentheses. Everybody is enforced to write clear, readable code. Autodesk's samples are quite well written but sometimes overdone. :) Automatic pretty printers, or so called beautifiers (see [6.3]) automatically format the code according to some kind of standard. On the R12 CD-ROM in the SDK2 ACG.DOC or at http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/autocad/docs/acg.txt is an excellent Autodesk documentation about coding, commenting and intentation standards to keep lisp code readable. The most important points are: * Comment your code using ";;;" at row 1, ";;" inside the code (indented) and ";" for trailing comments (at row 39) * Follow the indenting standards as given by the pretty printers to be able to write better structured code, which is more readable. esp. for SETQ, DEFUN, IF, COND, PROGN * Try to avoid global variables. If you use them (for efficiency), to clarify, place asterics around them in uppercase, i.e: *GLOBAL* * Don't forget to localize your variables (behind "/" in the DEFUN parameter list). Only for debugging purposes you may want to undefine them temporarly. * Name protection: Since AutoLISP provides no protected name space, it's easy to overwrite even system functions. Use unique short prefixes at least when you publish or give away your code. I use UR- for functions and UR: for variables. The ADGE and Autodesk forces even 4 letter prefixes. Then your names are safe from being overwritten by other kamikaze functions. * Always use the leading underscore with any string (commands and options) given to COMMAND and OSNAP. There are even enough commercial programs which do not work on international versions. (command "_PEDIT" ss "_J") is better than (command "PEDIT" ss "J") * Don't do too much SETQ's: LISP was originally a functional language, without any variables. There are enough constructs which work efficiently with lists without the need of storing values intermediatly in symbols. (see code samples [22]...) But for readability and debugging purposes you should always set symbols. * An old LISP rule is: Any good function is not longer than 6 lines :) (LISP is the second oldest computer language, invented by John McCarthy at the MIT in 1958) * Prefer CONS over APPEND: three CONS and one REVERSE is better than one APPEND. For tricks with APPEND (omitting NIL) see esp. Serge's samples: i.e. REMOVE at [11] or the style comparison at [23.1]) * Try to use English symbols and comments * Don't use T, MIN, MAX or LAST as symbols! These are system functions! User Contributions:Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic:Top Document: comp.cad.autocad AutoLISP FAQ (part 1/2) - general Previous Document: [1] Where can I find AutoLISP routines on the Internet? Next Document: [3] How do I debug AutoLISP programs? Part1 - Part2 - Single Page [ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ] Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer: rurban@xarch.tu-graz.ac.at (Reini Urban)
Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:11 PM
|
Throughout time, we can see how we have been carefully conditioned to come to this point where we are on the verge of a cashless society. Did you know that the Bible foretold of this event almost 2,000 years ago?
In the book of Revelation 13:16-18, we read,
"He (the false prophet who deceives many by his miracles--Revelation 19:20) causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man: His number is 666."
Referring to the last generation, this could only be speaking of a cashless society. Why so? Revelation 13:17 states that we cannot buy or sell unless we receive the mark of the beast. If physical money was still in use, we could buy or sell with one another without receiving the mark. This would contradict scripture that states we need the mark to buy or sell!
These verses could not be referring to something purely spiritual as scripture references two physical locations (our right hand or forehead) stating the mark will be on one "OR" the other. If this mark was purely spiritual, it would indicate both places, or one--not one OR the other!
This is where it comes together. It is amazing how accurate the Bible is concerning the implantable RFID microchip. Here is information from a man named Carl Sanders who worked with a team of engineers to help develop this RFID chip:
"Carl Sanders sat in seventeen New World Order meetings with heads-of-state officials such as Henry Kissinger and Bob Gates of the C.I.A. to discuss plans on how to bring about this one-world system. The government commissioned Carl Sanders to design a microchip for identifying and controlling the peoples of the world—a microchip that could be inserted under the skin with a hypodermic needle (a quick, convenient method that would be gradually accepted by society).
Carl Sanders, with a team of engineers behind him, with U.S. grant monies supplied by tax dollars, took on this project and designed a microchip that is powered by a lithium battery, rechargeable through the temperature changes in our skin. Without the knowledge of the Bible (Brother Sanders was not a Christian at the time), these engineers spent one-and-a-half-million dollars doing research on the best and most convenient place to have the microchip inserted.
Guess what? These researchers found that the forehead and the back of the hand (the two places the Bible says the mark will go) are not just the most convenient places, but are also the only viable places for rapid, consistent temperature changes in the skin to recharge the lithium battery. The microchip is approximately seven millimeters in length, .75 millimeters in diameter, about the size of a grain of rice. It is capable of storing pages upon pages of information about you. All your general history, work history, criminal record, health history, and financial data can be stored on this chip.
Brother Sanders believes that this microchip, which he regretfully helped design, is the “mark” spoken about in Revelation 13:16–18. The original Greek word for “mark” is “charagma,” which means a “scratch or etching.” It is also interesting to note that the number 666 is actually a word in the original Greek. The word is “chi xi stigma,” with the last part, “stigma,” also meaning “to stick or prick.” Carl believes this is referring to a hypodermic needle when they poke into the skin to inject the microchip."
Mr. Sanders asked a doctor what would happen if the lithium contained within the RFID microchip leaked into the body. The doctor replied by saying a terrible sore would appea (...)