I'm puzzled that you don't consider a small amount of research and
soliciting expert opinion to be an option. It seems unlikely that someone
maintaining a FAQ on a medically related subject should have no resources
for gathering information and asking questions. Sorry, it just seems that
I'm missing something here. If you already suspect that this product is not
accepted medical practice it ought to be easy to verify your suspicions. If
you feel a need to provide "alternative medicine" info, you should clearly
label it as such and include any medical opinions on it that you can find.
If this subject is so unusually esoteric that no one anywhere has an
opinion, except for the salesman, then I would hazzard a guess that no one
cares, and not include it.
=============================================================================
Mike Holloway |* On average, 8 people a day on the waiting list
mike.holloway@stjude.org | for a transplant die for lack of a donor.
____________________________|* The end-stage diseases treated by transplant
do not recognize age, race, nationality or pocketbook.
* There is no justifiable reason to deny organ donation, but many myths and
misunderstandings.
* Next of kin must allow donation. Your family must know your wishes.
* Only a small fraction of the next of kin of potential donors allow
donation to take place.
* In general, medical professionals do not recognize their obligation to
support and promote donation.
Questions? See FAQ:
http://www.lib.ox.ac.uk/internet/news/faq/bit.listserv.transplant.html
or
ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/pub/usenet/bit.listserv.transplant/
==============================================================================
[
Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive |
Search Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997
]
© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved