background image
OEM interview 3 (Mar. 16, 2004). The Watch Command's monitoring of EMS data proved instrumental in an
extremely early identification and then highly effective containment of the 1999 West Nile outbreak, which likely
would have resulted in many more fatalities but for OEM. Richard Sheirer interview (Apr. 7, 2004).
28. Richard Sheirer testimony (May 18, 2004); OEM interview 3 (Mar. 16, 2004).
29. New York City memo,"Direction and Control of Emergencies in the City of New York," July 2001 (signed
by Mayor Giuliani).
30. For the exact time of impact, see FAA analysis of American 11 radar returns and Commission analysis of
FAA radar data and air traffic control software logic. For the zone of impact, see National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) report,"Interim Report on the Federal Building Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade
Center," June 28, 2004. On people alive on the 92nd floor and above after the impact, see Commission analysis of
conditions on tower floors and advice received by civilians in the towers based on (1) calls to NYPD 911 from or
concerning people in the towers on September 11, 2001, and (2) transcripts of recorded calls to the Port Author-
ity police desk from people in the towers on September 11, 2001 (hereafter "Commission analysis of 911/PAPD
calls"). Everyone alive on the 91st floor was able to evacuate. Civilian interview 7 (Mar. 22, 2004); Civilian inter-
view 6 (Mar. 22, 2004). For civilians being alive but trapped, see Commission analysis of 911/PAPD calls; Civilian
interview 17 (May 11, 2004); Civilian interview 2 (Mar. 19, 2004).
31. For fire in the 77th floor elevator and damage to the 22nd floor, see Commission analysis of 911/PAPD
calls; Port Authority transcripts of recorded Port Authority calls and radio channels, Sept. 11, 2001, vol. II, channel
8, p. 4 (22nd floor). For a fireball in the lobby, see PAPD interview 1,WTC Command (Oct. 14, 2003); Civilian
interview 14 (Apr. 7, 2004). Burning jet fuel descended at least one elevator bank. FDNY interview 4, Chief (Jan.
8, 2004). For the roofs being engulfed and the winds, see, e.g., NYPD interview 16, Aviation (Apr. 1, 2004).
32. Commission analysis of 911/PAPD calls.
33. Ibid.
34. For the on-duty fire safety director's perspective, see WTC interview 6 (May 25, 2004). For the chiefs being
told by the Port Authority fire safety director that the evacuation order was given earlier, see PANYNJ interview
13 (Nov. 20, 2003). For him no longer being the designated fire safety director, see PANYNJ interview 11 (June
23, 2004).
35. For public announcements not being heard, see, e.g., Civilian interview 6 (Mar. 22, 2004); Civilian inter-
view 7 (Mar. 22, 2004); Civilian interview 9 (Mar. 23, 2004); Civilian interview 14 (Apr. 7, 2004); Commission
analysis of 911/PAPD calls.The evacuation tone was heard in some locations below the impact. Civilian interview
7 (Mar. 22, 2004); Commission analysis of 911/PAPD calls. For some emergency intercoms being unusable, see
WTC interview 9 (June 8, 2004); Port Authority transcripts of recorded Port Authority calls and radio channels,
Sept. 11, 2001. For evidence that some were usable, see WTC interview 6 (May 25, 2004).
36. For callers being disconnected, see Commission analysis of 911/PAPD calls. For the standard operating pro-
cedure and only a few people being available, causing calls to be transferred, see FDNY interview 28, Dispatch (Jan.
29, 2004). For delays and terminations, see Commission analysis of 911/PAPD calls.
37. For operators' and dispatchers' situational awareness and instructions to callers, see Commission analysis of
911/PAPD calls. For standard operating procedures for a high-rise fire, see FDNY interview 28, Dispatch (Jan. 29,
2004). For the fire chiefs' view, see FDNY interview 61, Chief (May 12, 2004); FDNY interview 62, Chief (May
12, 2004). For many injuries occurring during the evacuation, see Zachary Goldfarb and Steven Kuhr, "EMS
Response to the Explosion," in Manning, ed., The World Trade Center Bombing, p. 94.
38. FDNY interview 15, Chief (Jan. 14, 2004): FDNY interview 4, Chief (Jan. 8, 2004).
39. For operators' and dispatchers' lack of knowledge, see Commission analysis of 911/PAPD calls. For oper-
ators departing from protocol, see ibid.
40. Commission analysis of 911/PAPD calls; Port Authority transcripts of recorded Port Authority calls and
radio channels, Sept. 11, 2001, vol. II, channel 9, pp. 1­2, 23­24; channel 10, pp. 2, 6, 23.
41. See Civilian interview 6 (Mar. 22, 2004); Civilian interview 7 (Mar. 22, 2004); Civilian interview 14 (Apr.
7, 2004); Civilian interview 9 (Mar. 23, 2004). For Port Authority employees remaining, see Civilian interview 6
(Mar. 22, 2004); Civilian interview 7 (Mar. 22, 2004), Port Authority report, September 11 Special Awards Ceremony,
vol. 1, undated (recognitions 2, 3, 4, and 5).
42. For trouble reaching exits, see, e.g., Civilian interview 9 (Mar. 23, 2004). For "locked" doors, see, e.g., Civil-
ian interview 6 (Mar. 22, 2004); Civilian Interview 14 (Apr. 7, 2004); WTC interview 9 (June 8, 2004); Civilian
interview 7 (Mar. 22, 2004).
43. For smoke rising and its effect, see Commission analysis of 911/PAPD calls. For people jumping, see Civil-
ian interview 13 (Mar. 25, 2004); Commission analysis of 911/PAPD calls; Port Authority transcripts of recorded
Port Authority calls and radio channels, vol. II,WTC channel 26 (channel W), Sept. 11, 2001, pp. 4­6.
44.There is no evidence of a dispute between Morgan Stanley and the Port Authority over the Port Author-
ity's "defend in place" evacuation policy before September 11. For occupants who were unaware of what happened,
see, e.g., Civilian interview 1 (Mar. 2, 2004). For civilians concluding that the incident had occurred in the other
building, see Civilian interview 13 (Mar. 25, 2004); Civilian interview 1 (Mar. 2, 2004). For others being aware that
NOTES TO CHAPTER 9
543
FinalNotes.4pp 7/17/04 4:26 PM Page 543