background image
the yearlong monitoring of al Qaeda's cell in Nairobi, soon firmly fixed respon-
sibility on him and his associates.
37
Debate about what to do settled very soon on one option:Tomahawk cruise
missiles. Months earlier, after cancellation of the covert capture operation,
Clarke had prodded the Pentagon to explore possibilities for military action.
On June 2, General Hugh Shelton, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
had directed General Zinni at Central Command to develop a plan, which he
had submitted during the first week of July. Zinni's planners surely considered
the two previous times the United States had used force to respond to terror-
ism, the 1986 strike on Libya and the 1993 strike against Iraq.They proposed
firing Tomahawks against eight terrorist camps in Afghanistan, including Bin
Ladin's compound at Tarnak Farms.
38
After the embassy attacks, the Pentagon
offered this plan to the White House.
The day after the embassy bombings,Tenet brought to a principals meeting
intelligence that terrorist leaders were expected to gather at a camp near
Khowst,Afghanistan, to plan future attacks. According to Berger,Tenet said that
several hundred would attend, including Bin Ladin.The CIA described the area
as effectively a military cantonment, away from civilian population centers and
overwhelmingly populated by jihadists. Clarke remembered sitting next to
Tenet in a White House meeting, asking Tenet "You thinking what I'm think-
ing?" and his nodding "yes."
39
The principals quickly reached a consensus on
attacking the gathering.The strike's purpose was to kill Bin Ladin and his chief
lieutenants.
40
Berger put in place a tightly compartmented process designed to keep all
planning secret. On August 11, General Zinni received orders to prepare
detailed plans for strikes against the sites in Afghanistan.The Pentagon briefed
President Clinton about these plans on August 12 and 14.Though the princi-
pals hoped that the missiles would hit Bin Ladin, NSC staff recommended the
strike whether or not there was firm evidence that the commanders were at
the facilities.
41
Considerable debate went to the question of whether to strike targets out-
side of Afghanistan, including two facilities in Sudan. One was a tannery
believed to belong to Bin Ladin.The other was al Shifa, a Khartoum pharma-
ceutical plant, which intelligence reports said was manufacturing a precursor
ingredient for nerve gas with Bin Ladin's financial support.The argument for
hitting the tannery was that it could hurt Bin Ladin financially. The argument
for hitting al Shifa was that it would lessen the chance of Bin Ladin's having
nerve gas for a later attack.
42
Ever since March 1995, American officials had had in the backs of their
minds Aum Shinrikyo's release of sarin nerve gas in the Tokyo subway. Presi-
dent Clinton himself had expressed great concern about chemical and biolog-
ical terrorism in the United States. Bin Ladin had reportedly been heard to
speak of wanting a "Hiroshima" and at least 10,000 casualties.The CIA reported
116
THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT
Final1-4.4pp 7/17/04 9:12 AM Page 116