Top Document: SGI apps Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Previous Document: -51- Why does make(1) complain about syntax errors that I can't find? Next Document: -53- Why does my floating point signal processing routine, when given certain inputs, run incredibly slowly and See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge In IRIX 5.2 and 5.3, strip(1) fails to remove all of the debugging information that it could. This isn't a big problem; it just wastes a bit of disk space. Patches 247 and 248 fix that bug. Patch 410 to IRIX 5.3 includes a new loader (ld32), the output of which strip mangles horribly. Patch 1068 and IRIX 6.2 include a strip which can strip ld32 binaries, but which does not follow symlinks. In IRIX 6.0 and 6.0.1, 'strip *' strips the first executable correctly and corrupts the rest. Work around the bug by stripping only one file at a time. User Contributions:Top Document: SGI apps Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Previous Document: -51- Why does make(1) complain about syntax errors that I can't find? Next Document: -53- Why does my floating point signal processing routine, when given certain inputs, run incredibly slowly and Single Page [ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ] Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer: sgi-faq@viz.tamu.edu (The SGI FAQ group)
Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:12 PM
|
Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic: