Top Document: Compaq Contura Aero Frequently Asked Questions Previous Document: 3.2.3.1 Lap2Desk and WinLink Next Document: 3.2.3.3 Network File System (NFS) See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge [Q] I wondered whether WinLinks needs a special parallel cable. The story is as follows: I purchased a laplink parallel cable (made by PC Accessories) from CompUSA. This cable works fine with l2d / l2dmap (and the response is really snappy as compared to using a serial connection). However, WinLink (and its DOS counterpart WL) just get stuck in attempting to connect. Has anybody experienced a similar situation? Is the WinLink cable different from the standard parallel laplink cable? P.S.: I am running Novell DOS 7.0 on the host (and yes, I unloaded everything except for the memory management stuff like EMM and DPMS). [A] I bought the exact same cable as you have (Actually, two; one at work, one at home) and they work great. The only problem I've seen with WL.EXE (and, to a lesser degree, WinLink.EXE) is that if I use, say, the serial connection at 115K to transfer to another box and then try to use the parallel connection to the same (or even a different) machine, I have to: Start WinLink (without connecting to remote) Configure Comms to use LPT1: Save Configuration Exit WinLink Start WinLink If I do this on both the local and remote machines, the parallel transfer works fine; I can connect and transfer fine. BTW: Little known fact: You can run WinLink (under WinDoze) and exchange files with a DOS machine that's running WL.EXE. I couldn't get this to work for a while, and Compaq said it wouldn't work, but after going thru the steps above, it does work. There seems to be a bug of some esoteric flavor in the "connect" logic of both W*L* programs (I suspect they share some "core" code.) Actually, I really am not overly impressed with either of these products. I like the fact that they're functional for a "Quick-n-Dirty" transfer to another box, but in the main, I find that they are prone to hangage, lockage, and buggage; especially when connecting to a really slow (386-16, for example) remote. I get LOTS of transfer failures, both reading & writing. For the most part, I use the InterLnk.EXE and InterSvr.EXE on the desktop I connect to most. (You know, the ones that came with DOS.) I just put: ?DEVICE=C:\DOS\INTERLNK.EXE in my CONFIG.SYS and DOS asks me when I boot if I want to load the driver; if I'm connecting to my "main" desktop, I tell 'im Yes, and I'm connected! (I concede that this is probably a religious preference; flames to /dev/null, please!) What I'm most impressed with is the new "Direct Cable Connection" stuff that's in Chicago/Win'95.... (What are they calling it today?) This lets me connect, via the parallel cable, to another machine running Win'95 and use it as a gateway to all of the network resources that the desktop is connected to. I can use printers, local and network drives, CD-ROMs; whatever the desktop can see on the network. Really slick. User Contributions:Top Document: Compaq Contura Aero Frequently Asked Questions Previous Document: 3.2.3.1 Lap2Desk and WinLink Next Document: 3.2.3.3 Network File System (NFS) Single Page [ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ] Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer: Philip Wilk <PWilk-aerofaq@ZenSpider.com>
Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:12 PM
|
Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic: