Top Document: diabetes FAQ: bg monitoring (part 2 of 5) Previous Document: Table of Contents Next Document: Ouch! The cost of blood glucose measurement strips hurts my See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge bG (blood glucose) meters are not as accurate as the readings you get from them imply. For example, you might think that 108 means 108 mg/dl, not 107 or 109. But in fact all meters made for home use have at least a 10-15% error under ideal conditions. Thus you should interpret "108" as "probably between 100 and 120". (Similar considerations apply if you measure in units of mmol/L.) This is a random error and will not be consistent from one determination to the next. You cannot expect to get exactly the same reading from two checks done one after the other, nor from two meters using the same blood sample. This is generally considered acceptable because variations in this range will not make a major difference in treatment decisions. For example, the difference between 100 and 120 may make no difference in how you treat yourself, or at most might make a difference of one unit of insulin. With present technology, more accurate meters would be much more expensive. This expense is only justified in research work, where such accuracy might detect small trends which could go undetected with less accurate measurements. This discussion applies to ideal conditions. The error may be increased by poor or missing calibration, temperatures outside the intended range, outdated strips, improper technique, poor timing, insufficient sample size, contamination, and probably other factors. Contamination is especially serious since it can happen so easily and is likely to result in an overdose of insulin. Glucose is found in fruits, juices, sodas, and many other foods. Even a smidgen can seriously alter a reading. When comparing meter readings with lab results, also note that plasma readings are 15% higher than whole blood, and that capillary blood gives different readings from venous blood. Visually read strips are slightly less accurate than meters, with an error rate around 20-25%. For some meters, strips are available from manufacturers other than the meter manufacturer. Some m.h.d. readers have compared the strips side- by-side and found those from one manufacturer to read consistently lower than the strips from another. The differences are not likely to make a significant difference in your treatment, but are large enough to be noticeable and possibly confusing. For this reason it is not a good idea to change strip manufacturers without comparing the readings from one with the readings from the other. I've seen no such direct comparison of meters, but the possibility exists that some meters might read consistently lower than others. Be careful when changing meters. By "error rate" I mean twice the standard deviation from the mean. An error rate of 15% says that about 95% of the readings will be within 15% of the actual value. User Contributions:Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic:Top Document: diabetes FAQ: bg monitoring (part 2 of 5) Previous Document: Table of Contents Next Document: Ouch! The cost of blood glucose measurement strips hurts my Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Single Page [ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ] Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer: edward@paleo.org.SPAMNOT
Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:11 PM
|
between and mg/dl and mmol/l is, i came across your article and was so pleased to aquire a lot more info regarding blood glucose, how to read and convert it.